On Tue, Dec 13, 2016, at 06:33 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 14/12/2016 2:10 p.m., creditu wrote:
> > Looking for the best way to provide cache peer access for two urls on a
> > 3.1 accelerator. For example if a set of backend servers fullfill
> > requests for both www.example.com and
On 14/12/2016 2:10 p.m., creditu wrote:
> Looking for the best way to provide cache peer access for two urls on a
> 3.1 accelerator. For example if a set of backend servers fullfill
> requests for both www.example.com and www-legacy.example.com is the
> following the correct way to handle them in
On 14/12/2016 3:18 a.m., --Ahmad-- wrote:
>
> im not sure if the directive :
>
> external_acl_type type-name %SRC %LOGIN /path/to/ext_file_userip_acl -f
> /path/to/config.file
>
> will help becuase its description on ip/mask , not ip:port
>
If you want to write your own helper you could base
On 14/12/2016 11:44 a.m., Steve Becker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> My background's in networking, I'm very new to unix/linux and server
> administration, I don't know a whole lot about security beyond ACLs and
> setting up crypto for VPNs. I'm setting up a box at home with CentOS and
> squid,
On Tuesday 13 December 2016 at 23:44:12, Steve Becker wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi.
> My background's in networking, I'm very new to unix/linux and server
> administration, I don't know a whole lot about security beyond ACLs and
> setting up crypto for VPNs.
>
> I'm setting up a box at home with CentOS
On 13/12/2016 10:15 p.m., Per Jessen wrote:
> Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
>> On 13/12/2016 5:11 a.m., Fomo Dong wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> For couple of days I'm trying to figure out how to get a transparent
>>> HTTPs proxy to work with Squid. What I'm trying to achieve is a proxy
>>> that accepts
And you are still using squid?
Eliezer
Eliezer Croitoru
Linux System Administrator
Mobile: +972-5-28704261
Email: elie...@ngtech.co.il
-Original Message-
From: Yuri Voinov [mailto:yvoi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 10:09 PM
To: Eliezer Croitoru
It means exactly what it said: URL too long.
In Squid's defaults set 8k for URL size. This was reasonable maximum 10
years ago.
Now it seems too small (at least 4 times) because of now Internet full
of adware bullshit (referrals/trackers/counters etc.) which is often
more 8k.
You can easy fix
I did not dig deep into it I couldn't scan the access log for it because I
had no idea what 'too long' meant.
I will ignore it until someone says they're unable to access a website, and
they can give me details of what it is.
On 13 December 2016 at 19:51, Eliezer Croitoru
On 2016-12-13 22:03, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 12/13/2016 09:51 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
I think that the maximum size was 64k
The maximum appears to be 8KB:
v3.5/src/defines.h:#define MAX_URL 8192
v4/src/defines.h:#define MAX_URL 8192
v5/src/defines.h:#define MAX_URL 8192
IIRC,
On 12/13/2016 09:51 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> I think that the maximum size was 64k
The maximum appears to be 8KB:
v3.5/src/defines.h:#define MAX_URL 8192
v4/src/defines.h:#define MAX_URL 8192
v5/src/defines.h:#define MAX_URL 8192
IIRC, there are many emails discussing this limit
I think that the maximum size was 64k and it's way above this.
It should not be an issue if this is some weird application creating some
random url which doesn't have meaning.
But if you know what is creating such a url it's a whole another story.
Can you reproducerecreate this url?
Eliezer
thank you brother , you have been rock !
> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:21 PM, FredB wrote:
>
>
> /root/soso/userIP.conf
>
> Make a try with /tmp
>
> /tmp/userIP.conf
>
> Fred
> ___
> squid-users mailing list
>
Now, You should use another directory, less insecure I mean
/tmp is r/w for all ...
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
hey squid users .
i have a question .
say i have 1 ipv4 and with 100 ports opened with http directive .
say i have 100 user/pwd for squid.
the question is how can i bind each user to ip:port
i mean i don’t want each user to be available on each port .. i just want to
bind each port with
Which of the helpers are you having issues with?
The Group or the user one?
I did some experiment with ldap groups which can be found at:
http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/2015-July/004874.html
Eliezer
Eliezer Croitoru
Linux System Administrator
Mobile: +972-5-28704261
/root/soso/userIP.conf
Make a try with /tmp
/tmp/userIP.conf
Fred
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
hello squid users & hello Amos
amos I’m trying to do like 1000 ipv6 binding outgoing usernames but i have the
error like helpers are crashed .. I’m not sure if i need to tune some settings
before completion to take out the error .
here is the config i used for that i needed :
auth_param
Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 13/12/2016 5:11 a.m., Fomo Dong wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> For couple of days I'm trying to figure out how to get a transparent
>> HTTPs proxy to work with Squid. What I'm trying to achieve is a proxy
>> that accepts internet traffic from ports 80 & 443, routes them
>>
Hi,
Saw this on my cache.log (squid-3.5.22, FreeBSD-9.3,):
2016/12/13 11:47:55| WARNING: no_suid: setuid(0): (1) Operation not
permitted
2016/12/13 11:47:55| WARNING: no_suid: setuid(0): (1) Operation not
permitted
2016/12/13 11:47:55| HTCP Disabled.
2016/12/13 11:47:55| Finished loading MIME
20 matches
Mail list logo