On 19/07/17 01:42, Walter H. wrote:
(expanded from
): mail forwarding loop for
squid-us...@squid-cache.org
Why?
You sent a mail to the address squid-users@squid-cache.*
The mailing list address is squid-users@lists.*
Amos
___
squid-u
Hi,
FYI I had the same object (an image) duplicated x1000, x1, x3,
x6, x10, x13, x16 and finally x20. The real size of my
object was ~ 45 KB (48 KB for squid as in counts headers + fs structure I
guess).
The growth was almost linear and values I posted here is an avera
On 19/07/17 01:37, Walter H. wrote:
On Tue, July 18, 2017 15:28, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 18.07.17 14:29, Walter H. wrote:
-A INPUT -i br0 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i br0 -m tcp -p tcp --dport 3128 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -j LOG --log
On 19/07/17 00:28, Antony Stone wrote:
Maybe you could also answer my questions:
In addition to those answers, please also post at least the http_port
and https_port lines from your squid.conf.
Amos
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.
On 07/18/2017 12:32 PM, bugreporter wrote:
> Hi Alex & Amos. Below results:
>
> On a x64 machine:
> v ~ 207 Bytes
For the record, sizeof(StoreEntry) + sizeof(LruNode) = 104 + 24 = 128
bytes (for Squid v5 on an x64 host).
If your results are correct, we cannot account for ~80 bytes, which is
~50
Hi Alex & Amos. Below results:
On a x64 machine:
v ~ 207 Bytes
On a x86 machine:
v ~ 116
Warm Regards,
-
Bug Reporter Contributor
OpenSource = Open-Minded
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/HDD-RAM-Capacity-vs-store-avg-object-size-tp46830
I am trying to debug ssl-bump and am looking specifically for decisions that
Squid takes with regard to bumping, splicing and unsupported protocol.
The config file for Squid 4.0.21 has
debug_options ALL,1 33,9 83,9
http_port 10.10.10.1:3230ssl-bump ...
acl tls_is_skype ssl::server_na
On Tuesday 18 July 2017 at 14:42:21, Walter H. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On every post I get an error mail back
What's the difference between the posts which generate an error, and this one
which got through?
Are you sending all from the same address, through the same mail server?
Antony.
--
"On
Hello,
On every post I get an error mail back:
Subject:Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
From: "Mail Delivery System"
Date: Tue, July 18, 2017 15:36
To: ...
Priority: Normal
This is the mail system at host lists.squid-cache.org.
I'm sorry to hav
On Tue, July 18, 2017 15:28, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 18.07.17 14:29, Walter H. wrote:
>>-A INPUT -i br0 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
>
>>-A INPUT -i br0 -m tcp -p tcp --dport 3128 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
>
>>-A INPUT -j LOG --log-prefix "IP[IN]: " --log-level 7
>
On 18.07.17 14:29, Walter H. wrote:
-A INPUT -i br0 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i br0 -m tcp -p tcp --dport 3128 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -j LOG --log-prefix "IP[IN]: " --log-level 7
[17-Jul-2017; 19:49:13.590130] IP[IN]: IN=br0 OUT=
MAC=24:01:
Hi,
I have a problem to login to one website (http://intouch.techdata.com)
using Squid 3.5.20 on Centos 7 with default Squid configuration, which
is acting as web proxy (non-transparent) on 3128 port in my network:
--
#
# Reco
On Tuesday 18 July 2017 at 13:29:04, Walter H. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my Router Box runs a CentOS 6, with the EPEL squid34 RPM package
>
> this the iptables
>
Does the output of "iptables -L -nvx" match the ruleset you've quoted here?
I'm just wondering whether the rules have got loaded properly
Hello,
my Router Box runs a CentOS 6, with the EPEL squid34 RPM package
this the iptables
*filter
:INPUT DROP [0:0]
:FORWARD DROP [0:0]
:OUTPUT DROP [0:0]
# Allow multicast
-A INPUT -d 224.0.0.0/4 -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -d 224.0.0.0/4 -j ACCEPT
# Allow anything on the local link
-A INPUT -i lo -j
On Tuesday 18 July 2017 at 13:09:31, Pablo Ruben Maldonado wrote:
> The iptables only follow configuration:
>
> -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 3128
> -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 443 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 3129
Oh, you didn't say this was an intercepting pro
The iptables only follow configuration:
-A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 3128
-A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 443 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 3129
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> On 17.07.17 17:31, Pablo Ruben Maldonado wrote:
>
>> He
On Tuesday 18 July 2017 at 12:11:58, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 17.07.17 17:31, Pablo Ruben Maldonado wrote:
> >Hello, I have a squid box 3.5 working without problems for the lan
> >192.168.110.0/24 for several months. Now I want setup to another lan
> >192.168.115.0/24 but I cannot. Tcpdu
On 17.07.17 17:31, Pablo Ruben Maldonado wrote:
Hello, I have a squid box 3.5 working without problems for the lan
192.168.110.0/24 for several months. Now I want setup to another lan
192.168.115.0/24 but I cannot. Tcpdump inform me that the packages come to
squid box. But in Squid's log I do not
On 18/07/17 02:56, bugreporter wrote:
Thank you Amos,
OK so how can I accurately measure the memory usage?
I don't have an answer to that one sorry.
I personally just use the top values.
Amos
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-ca
19 matches
Mail list logo
