Hi Andrea,
> I see this feature was introduced in 3.5 as an experimental one; at 4.13
> is it still so or is it considered stable and dependable?
We are using the squid ftp_port feature for some customers. So far, we have not
experienced any issues.
The only downside to using frox (from which
Hi all,
We have some improvements to the WCCPv2 packet parser which need
real-traffic testing to verify nothing is broken before being submitted
for merge.
If you are able to test a patch of WCCPv2 please get in touch with me.
It will require Squid-4 or later version.
Cheers
Amos
On 7/12/20 9:14 am, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 12/6/20 10:12 AM, L A Walsh wrote:
...
* ignore-no-cache
Squid v3.2 release notes imply that Squid does what most admins want
now, without any explicit option: "Its commonly desired behaviour is
obsoleted by correct HTTP/1.1 Cache-Control:no-cache
On 12/6/20 10:12 AM, L A Walsh wrote:
> Since the early 4.x series and now, the cache control headers:
> ignore-no-cache
> ignore-must-revalidate
> ignore-auth
> have been "obsoleted". Indicating something has replaced them and
> there's a new & better way to ignore those headers for
> static
On 12/6/20 10:26 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> I see this feature was introduced in 3.5 as an experimental one; at 4.13
> is it still so or is it considered stable and dependable?
AFAIK, FTP proxy is successfully used in some production environments,
but I bet that most Squid deployments do not
On 12/6/20 5:01 PM, Antony Stone wrote:
Oh, so you're in charge of both?
Yes.
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
On Sunday 06 December 2020 at 16:56:10, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> On 12/6/20 4:44 PM, Antony Stone wrote:
> > Where is the firewall, compared to your Squid proxy, in the network?
>
> Squid runs on the firewall itself.
>
> > I'm just wondering how you plan to use Squid's native FTP mode to
On 12/6/20 4:44 PM, Antony Stone wrote:
Where is the firewall, compared to your Squid proxy, in the network?
Squid runs on the firewall itself.
I'm just wondering how you plan to use Squid's native FTP mode to bypass a
firewall, which is therefore presumably blocking FTP...?
It's not
On Sunday 06 December 2020 at 16:26:26, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm trying to evaulate FTP proxying with squid and I have a couple of
> questions.
> To be clear, I'm not talking about FTP through HTTP, but about the
> ftp_port option.
> I've used frox (http://frox.sourceforge.net/)
Hello.
I'm trying to evaulate FTP proxying with squid and I have a couple of
questions.
To be clear, I'm not talking about FTP through HTTP, but about the
ftp_port option.
I've used frox (http://frox.sourceforge.net/) in the past for this.
I see this feature was introduced in 3.5 as an
Since the early 4.x series and now, the cache control headers:
ignore-no-cache
ignore-must-revalidate
ignore-auth
have been "obsoleted". Indicating something has replaced them and
there's a new & better way to ignore those headers for
static files (most often web-fonts, though some javascript
11 matches
Mail list logo
