On 2016-11-15 22:31, AUBERT Thibaud wrote:
Hi Guys,
Ok, QoS might help to control traffic on the internet access side, but
it won't help between the source, client on a small remote
office/output, and the proxy.
It might also be difficult to split this traffic between what is
intended to
2016 11:36
À : squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Objet : Re: [squid-users] is ACL conditional directive possible ?
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 22:48 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Then you integrate Squid with those system QoS controls by using the
> tcp_outgoing_tos directive with ACLs t
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 22:48 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Then you integrate Squid with those system QoS controls by using the
> tcp_outgoing_tos directive with ACLs to send the appropriate TOS
> label for the client IP.
Hi Amos,
AFAIK, the directive 'tcp_outgoing_tos' is applied only for
On 15/11/2016 11:01 p.m., AUBERT Thibaud wrote:
> Hi Amos,
>
> Sounds like a pretty interesting approach. Getting in touch with my
> network colleagues and convince them to change their Infra/routers
> configuration will be quiet a challenge through.
>
Okay. Network-wide would be best as it
On 15/11/2016 10:19 p.m., AUBERT Thibaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently stuck on a study that consist to set different
> ''reply_body_max_size" directives, depending on the source IP.
>
> Here's the current proxy Infra : I have some corporate proxy
> (v3.5.19) used by some small and remote
Hi,
I'm currently stuck on a study that consist to set different
''reply_body_max_size" directives, depending on the source IP.
Here's the current proxy Infra : I have some corporate proxy (v3.5.19) used by
some small and remote offices, with a small link (8mbits/sec). Those proxy are
often
