On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Edward Dam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've cleared the rules, and then applied your recommended iptables command.
Unfortunately, it puts me right back to where I started. When the
www.example.com redirects to http://www2.example.com:8098/login.aspx,
it never
Hello, thank you again for the reply.
When I take off transparent mode, the result is the same, it does not
access (time out)
There seems to be some confusion on what I am trying to do.
I am NOT trying to redirect www.example.com to
www2.example.com:8098/login.aspx via my proxy server.
The
When I take off transparent mode, the result is the same, it does not
access (time out)
without squid, When you access www.example.com, does it redirect to
www2.example.com:8098/login.aspx ?
If yes, Webserver www.example.com is OK.
Hope to hear from you.
Thank you
Indunil Jayasooriya
Yes, that is correct. If I bypass squid and go to www.example.com, it
automatically redirects to www2.example.com:8098/login.aspx
OK, SOUNDS GOOD. i.e nothing wrong with webserver www.example.com
www2.example.com is running on port 8098. Can you change it to port 80
? Then, Pls browse
www2.example.com server is not my within my company. I cannot change
the port on it
Again, pls disable both transparent intercept mode and dansguardian in squid.
Then, browse www.example.com via squid.
Pls give me the output of below command
tail -f /var/log/squid/acccess.log
and, also I
On mån, 2008-06-02 at 10:06 +0800, Edward Dam wrote:
When a user points to www.example.com, that webpage/server redirects
them to http://www2.example.com:8098/login.aspx
The redirection is timing out. I've put port 8098 as one of the
Safe_ports in squid.conf, and allowed both example.com and
No other logging for it.
Thanks for your logs. I think that 10.43.8.20 is the server where
www2.example.com.
So far, We checked in two ways. One way is without squid (Direct
connection)Then, It worked.
What is this path,
Is it via a firewall? Pls write down that PATH.
The , other PATH is
10.1.15.245 is the squid server. It resides on the LAN.
10.1.15.240 is the LAN interface
10.1.15.241 is connected to INTRANET
What is you laptop ip?
We know you (i.e your laptop) can access www2.example.com without squid.
Can you tracert to www2.example.com (NOT throuogh squid)
I think
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Amos Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Amos Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hello gurus,
I have been trying the whole day to get Squid to work as a reverse
my laptop IP is 10.1.15.57.
10.1.15.240 is the LAN interface of the router. It is normally the
gateway - however when I am using squid (transparent) the squid server
becomes my gateway.
Yeah, Interesting.
Then, this is your network setup
if you bypass squid ,
your laptop - Firewall -
I am GLAD to hear am very happy about your effort in solving this ISSUE.
HAPPY squiding.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Edward Dam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
Thank you for all your help. I have figured out that it is actually
related to DNS. When I put the intranet DNS server (from
Thanks a lot, it's work :)
On mån, 2008-06-02 at 10:52 +0200, Keke Man wrote:
Hi,
I want to know if it's possible to have an ACL to grant a user to
access a domain.
Sure. Just combine the two acls on the same http_access line..
Hi,
I want to know if it's possible to have an ACL to grant a user to
access a domain.
My users are authenticated with LDAP.
To grant access a user :
acl prj1 proxy_auth toto
http_access allow prj1
http_reply_access allow prj1
To grant access for a domain :
acl prj2 dstdom_regex youtube
On mån, 2008-06-02 at 11:09 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
it, especially because Outlook needs the https:// URI. However, as we
are going to do the SSL offloading on the accelerator, I believe
http:// would suffice.
It will, but you need to configure Squid cache_peer with the
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Henrik Nordstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On mån, 2008-06-02 at 11:09 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
it, especially because Outlook needs the https:// URI. However, as we
are going to do the SSL offloading on the accelerator, I believe
http:// would suffice.
Henrik Nordstrom disse na ultima mensagem:
On sön, 2008-06-01 at 09:45 -0300, Michel (M) wrote:
yes I understand the msgs but it is not the case, I run the exact same
config on the exact same machine (only by stopping 2.7 and starting 2.6
with the exact same configs) and 2.6 works but 2.7
Hello,
I am trying to block shoutcast streaming, but all i can find on the net is
blocking the media players, which is something that I can not do since it is
needed at times. As well, the non standard ports are needed to access other
sites. Can anyone help please?
I found that the method below did not work, actually. I still
have not figured out just how Apache's htdigest is joining the
several inputs to create the md5 hash, but it isn't
user:realm:password | md5sum.
I finally got digest auth to work by doing the following (the
-c creates the
Hi Dears
We use wccpv2, delay_pools and reply and request headers set to
128K, Does the 2.7 Version supports it?
Thanks :)
On mån, 2008-06-02 at 13:41 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
(actually, this is supposed to be the only entry for cache_peer I am
goingto have?)
If you only have one server, and that server is only talking http then
yes there is only a single cache_peer..
That has worked. It also requied a
anyone?
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:55 PM, alexus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there a way using squid proxy to somehow allow certaint people to
access some websites and another group of people access another group
of websites?
maybe some sort of authentication of some sort?
--
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Henrik Nordstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On mån, 2008-06-02 at 13:41 +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
(actually, this is supposed to be the only entry for cache_peer I am
goingto have?)
If you only have one server, and that server is only talking http then
On mån, 2008-06-02 at 12:03 -0430, Juan C. Crespo R. wrote:
We use wccpv2, delay_pools and reply and request headers set to
128K, Does the 2.7 Version supports it?
Yes.
Regards
Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On mån, 2008-06-02 at 10:10 -0400, Chris Riggins wrote:
I found that the method below did not work, actually. I still
have not figured out just how Apache's htdigest is joining the
several inputs to create the md5 hash, but it isn't
user:realm:password | md5sum.
It is the same. Try again..
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/SquidAcl
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/ProxyAuthentication
On mån, 2008-06-02 at 12:15 -0400, alexus wrote:
anyone?
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:55 PM, alexus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there a way using squid proxy to somehow allow certaint people
Sorry, it never matches when I do it. eg.
(0)[slash]/opt/home/p36wk $ echo -n p36wk:Realm:passw0rd | md5sum
3acaf7548c911426be232de30c802233 -
$ /opt/apache/bin/htdigest -c passwd.htdigest p36wk Realm
Adding password for Realm in realm p36wk.
New password: [passw0rd]
Re-type new password:
I am preparing to use SQUID for web-filtering at a public library to replace
CyberSitter. I have it running on a test machine locally and am using some
temp homemade blacklists. Is there an easy way to make Dans Guardian run on
a Windows machine? IF not, is there an alternative to Dans Guardian
On mån, 2008-06-02 at 15:19 -0400, Chris Riggins wrote:
Sorry, it never matches when I do it. eg.
(0)[slash]/opt/home/p36wk $ echo -n p36wk:Realm:passw0rd | md5sum
3acaf7548c911426be232de30c802233 -
$ echo -n p36wk:Realm:passw0rd | md5sum
336326719e5c087aa1016fe5a3c871d4 -
$
On mån, 2008-06-02 at 15:52 -0400, Curt Coleman wrote:
I am preparing to use SQUID for web-filtering at a public library to replace
CyberSitter. I have it running on a test machine locally and am using some
temp homemade blacklists. Is there an easy way to make Dans Guardian run on
a Windows
Is there a way to tell squid 2.6 (selective to URL or not) to ignore the
Cache-Control: no-cache directive?
Nick
Hello Guys!
Please, is the information about the message
(http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/200804/0420.html#replies)
work in squid version 3.0 stable 5?
thanks
On mån, 2008-06-02 at 15:47 -0500, Ritter, Nicholas wrote:
Is there a way to tell squid 2.6 (selective to URL or not) to ignore the
Cache-Control: no-cache directive?
refresh_pattern ignore-reload option.
Regards
Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On mån, 2008-06-02 at 18:27 -0300, Rodrigo de Oliveira Gomes wrote:
Hello Guys!
Please, is the information about the message
(http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/200804/0420.html#replies)
work in squid version 3.0 stable 5?
No, only 2.7 so far. But is likely to be seen
is there a way using squid proxy to somehow allow certaint people to
access some websites and another group of people access another group
of websites?
maybe some sort of authentication of some sort?
yes. I am running with nsca_auth
pls add below lines to squid.conf file
auth_param
35 matches
Mail list logo
