Hello,
our squid passes all the http traffic to a parent proxy. Now we have two
sites that work only if we access them through another parent proxy.
Is there a way to tell squid to redirect certain domains to this
secondary proxy ?
Thanks
Andreas
Andreas Moroder wrote:
our squid passes all the http traffic to a parent proxy. Now we have two
sites that work only if we access them through another parent proxy.
Is there a way to tell squid to redirect certain domains to this
secondary proxy ?
Yes. It is possible. I'm a bit rusty on how,
Andreas,
There is an option to redirect specifically some sites. For example, we
can redirect example.com to another server by using cache_peer as follows.
cache_peer 172.16.x.x(IP of another Server) parent 3128(SQUID PORT)
3130(ICP_PORT)
cache_peer_domain example.com
Thanks
Visolve
Tim Bates schrieb:
Andreas Moroder wrote:
our squid passes all the http traffic to a parent proxy. Now we have two
sites that work only if we access them through another parent proxy.
Is there a way to tell squid to redirect certain domains to this
secondary proxy ?
Yes. It is possible. I'm a
then I would have to install samba from what I understand, and or
policy is not file sharing services allowed on the firewalls . Is
there a way to get a single sign on with out installing samba ?
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Kevin Blackwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory,
I was running
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 03:30:37PM +0200, Mike Raath wrote:
proxy.pac may be an option, but if possible I'd like to keep the
zero configuration element of a transparent proxy.
The best solution is to bypass your interception completely for
those particular servers (based on their IP). Is this
Gustavo Lazarte wrote:
I upgraded and now when I am trying to use my squid server to send traffic to the site 10.2.0.140 the squid server IP is 10.2.0.150.
I also get the Warning cannot write the log file Permission denied.
Then I try the /usr/local/squid/sbin/squid I get cannot write
Mike Raath wrote:
proxy.pac may be an option, but if possible I'd like to keep the zero
configuration element of a transparent proxy.
Amos - I'm not quite sure how to integrate your suggestion with what I
had. Bear in mind that the IP address specified in the request could
be anything from
Gregory Machin wrote:
then I would have to install samba from what I understand, and or
policy is not file sharing services allowed on the firewalls . Is
there a way to get a single sign on with out installing samba ?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the NTLM helper for squid
Hello,
I'm configuring a 2.7 Stable 4 squid for NTLM authentication across
a slow link (VPN over internet). It's working, no problem at all. I've
joined squid box on the AD, winbind is running, wbinfo -t, -g and -u are
OK. Everything is OK, authentication is running fine.
Altough,
No you wouldn't. I guess the squid one works too, everyone just
recommends that you user the samba one. In my experience, both work
fine. Have you tried the squid one?
Kevin
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Gregory Machin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
then I would have to install samba from what I
The service is up but is not getting any content from the destination server.
Is there a line I need to change to make it forward traffic to my target server?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 7:38 AM
To: Gustavo
Hi guys,
I have been able to authenticate a group in Active Directory but been
unable to authenticate multiple groups in the same AD. Does anyone
know how to go about it!!So far a single group authentication using
ntlm_auth works perfectly apart from the Domain Admins who it cant
prevent from
Gustavo Lazarte wrote:
The service is up but is not getting any content from the destination server.
Is there a line I need to change to make it forward traffic to my target server?
What type of proxy are you trying to setup?
Your config is for a standard proxy.
Amos
Thanks
14 matches
Mail list logo