On 20-5-2010 8:22, Henrik Nordström wrote:
ons 2010-05-19 klockan 22:22 +0200 skrev Angelo Höngens:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/InnerWorkings
The proper way to deal with Set-Cookie reply headers, according to RFC
2109 is to cache the whole object, EXCEPT the Set-Cookie header lines
,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business Specialist
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
+31 (0)13 5811088
+31 (0)13 5821239
a.hong...@netmatch.nl
should usually not be cached.)
Proxies must not introduce Set-Cookie (Cookie) headers of their own
in proxy responses (requests).
Is this a 'bug' in the documentation/squid, is it a well-considered
deviation from rfc, or am I missing something?
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
..
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
T: +31 (0)13 5811088
F: +31 (0)13 5821239
mailto:a.hong...@netmatch.nl
http://www.netmatch.nl
--
for other resources..
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
T: +31 (0)13 5811088
F: +31 (0)13 5821239
mailto:a.hong...@netmatch.nl
http
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business Specialist
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
+31 (0)13 5811088
+31 (0)13 5821239
a.hong
/*
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business Specialist
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
+31 (0)13 5811088
+31 (0)13 5821239
-owa-using-a-reverse-proxy/
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business Specialist
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
+31 (0)13
know your findings ;)
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business Specialist
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
+31 (0)13 5811088
could NOT
fit the bill..
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business Specialist
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
+31 (0)13 5811088
be that if your timekeeping is off and/or ntpd is not running
to correct tick duration, top might report incorrect information.
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business Specialist
,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
T: +31 (0)13 5811088
F: +31 (0)13 5821239
mailto:a.hong...@netmatch.nl
http://www.netmatch.nl
-
noCompressionForProxies:false
iisreset
--
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
T: +31 (0)13
(and don't
forget the iisreset).
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business Specialist
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
+31 (0)13 5811088
Content-Length: 2845
Based on these response headers, Squid decides to cache or not.
Particularly interesting is the 'Cache-Control' header. From there on,
google further ;)
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small Business
? If so, is it possible to just hand
over all the headers from client, and let the client decide whether to
accept compressing or not?
It has nothing to do with accept-encoding headers. Just sniff as I
suggested, and all will be clear.
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems
response via squid looks like a hit. What does
the iis log look like? It could be that squid thinks the object is not
fresh, and tries to find out if the object has changed since.
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
MCSE on Windows 2003
MCSE on Windows 2000
MS Small
On 15-11-2009 12:21, Angelo Höngens wrote:
On 13-11-2009 23:00, Angelo Höngens wrote:
Hey guys and girls, I'm back on the list again to ask for your help with
a really strange problem.
I am having issues with ssl-to-ssl proxying with multiple applications,
but the one I am describing below
localhost:8001.
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
Systems Administrator
--
NetMatch
tourism internet software solutions
Ringbaan Oost 2b
5013 CA Tilburg
T: +31 (0)13 5811088
F: +31 (0)13 5821239
mailto:a.hong...@netmatch.nl
http://www.netmatch.nl
On 13-11-2009 23:00, Angelo Höngens wrote:
Hey guys and girls, I'm back on the list again to ask for your help with
a really strange problem.
I am having issues with ssl-to-ssl proxying with multiple applications,
but the one I am describing below is bugging me the most. I hope you can
cache_peer_access tfsweb-https deny port80
cache_peer_access tfsweb-https deny port443
cache_peer_access tfsweb-https allow port8091
cache_peer_domain tfsweb-https dstdomain external name
Thanks in advance for your time (replies to list please).
--
With kind regards,
Angelo Höngens
systems administrator
Looks like the object is expiring, because I see the storeExpireNow
command. But I don't get exactly why it's expiring.. Well, I see
something in the log, but I do not understand what it means:
2008/07/11 08:41:48| FRESH: age 3600 min 216000
2008/07/11 08:41:48| Staleness = -1
2008/07/11
Amos, thanks for your reply! My comments below:
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Hey guys,
I've got a proprietary web application what we use as a back end for
other applications, and I want to do some agressive caching using squid,
as a test, to reduce the load on the back end.
I spent 2-3 days on
23 matches
Mail list logo
