Hi all,
Is it possible to make the request back out the router that sent in
a WCCP packet to begin with? For example if you have two routers, and router
A sends request A and router B sends request B to send them back through
their origin routers, regardless of your default route etc so
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Moylan
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 12:39 PM
To: Dave Raven
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Performance (with Polygraph)
Doesn't diskd have a bug whereby it has issues under heavy load.
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id
]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 1:48 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: 'John Moylan'; 'squid-users'
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Performance (with Polygraph)
Hi Dave,
Dave Raven wrote:
I have seen the error messages before, but not during these tests. diskd
definitely seems to delay the time-till
...
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Chadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 1:51 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: 'Adrian Chadd'; squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Performance (with Polygraph)
What you may need to do is run the tests
because the diskd processes
are able to use more than one processor? Except their cpu usage never goes
over ~3%...
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 3:07 AM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: 'Adrian Chadd'; squid-users@squid
higher than its doing.
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Chadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 12:13 AM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: 'Adrian Chadd'; squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Performance (with Polygraph)
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007
You could use refresh_pattern to force everything to be cached...
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 3:37 AM
To: murrah boswell
Cc: squid-users
Subject: Re: [squid-users] How can I do this??
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 18:28
What about using offline mode - if its educational I assume you could
probably just download after hours ? Turn it off when you download with
wget, and put it back on afterwards?
-Original Message-
From: murrah boswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 4:04 AM
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 11:55 AM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: 'Adrian Chadd'; squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Performance (with Polygraph)
Check netstat -mb and see if you're running out of mbufs?
You haven't mentioned whether the CPU is being pegged at this point
(with
the same results, just different times that it fails after).
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Chadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 3:35 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Performance (with Polygraph
Hi all,
I'm busy testing a squid box with 8xSATA drives, 4gig of DDRII
memory and 2x 2.6gig dual core processors. I'm using the basic datacomm test
from polygraph. I've configured 6 of the drives to use COSS, and the other
two diskd (I've also done basic ufs tests). During all of the
with iostat, it seems to
stay the same even after my slow down period...
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Chadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 5:17 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Performance
80 minutes -- very
weird...
I'll try to get you all the stats I can tomorrow morning
Thanks again for the help
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Chadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 5:37 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: 'Adrian Chadd'; squid-users@squid-cache.org
Chadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 8:05 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: 'Adrian Chadd'; squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Performance (with Polygraph)
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007, Dave Raven wrote:
Hi Adrian,
I've got diskd configured to be used
, then a different motherboard
etc - try some different setups today. Thanks again for all the help and
please let me know if anyone has any ideas...
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Chadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 4:08 AM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: squid
Hi all,
Is there a way to assume that anything under a certain domain is
similar across servers? For example, www.youtube.com videos come from
various servers --
1191839044.533 53841 10.10.108.250 TCP_MISS/200 1770189 GET
http://sjc-v180.sjc.youtube.com/get_video? - DIRECT/64.15.120.171
for the help
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Chadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 9:38 AM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Same Domain Caching
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007, Dave Raven wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a way
Hi all,
I've been doing some high performance testing with squid (2.6) and
if you use enough hardware the problem shifts to being with network
connections (for me at least). Above around 300 RPS on a unit with latency
on both sides and many clients you start to chew up network buffers (on
Hi,
Is squid able to properly proxy ftp - e.g. support uploads and
authentication through a web browser (like IE), or just downloads? I did do
some googling but most of my findings were older
Thanks in advance
Dave
Hi all,
Are there any known bugs or config problems etc that might be able
to cause mbufs on a FreeBSD box to be completely utilised? This is not under
high load - its during the down time, and they are completely used within 5
minutes, whereas the cache has been running under much higher
Hi all,
I have a strange problem with the Failure Ratio messages --
2006/08/30 02:41:09| Failure Ratio at 1.37
2006/08/30 02:41:09| Going into hit-only-mode for 5 minutes...
2006/08/30 02:46:14| Failure Ratio at 1.46
2006/08/30 02:46:14| Going into hit-only-mode for 5 minutes...
udp_incoming_address is correct, I don't know why its breaking. Can you
send us a config file ?
You could of course just deny access to the port on the other cards for an
easy fix... Through some other mechanism.
-Original Message-
From: Vadim Pushkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11
Try 'debug_options'
-Original Message-
From: Wojciech Puchar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 November 2005 11:03 PM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: [squid-users] software caused connection abort
can such messages
Nov 12 22:01:47 hel squid[22265]: comm_accept: FD 8: (53)
Try 'debug_options'
-Original Message-
From: Wojciech Puchar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 November 2005 11:03 PM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: [squid-users] software caused connection abort
can such messages
Nov 12 22:01:47 hel squid[22265]: comm_accept: FD 8: (53)
Run squid under some sort of trace program - you'll need to see whats
causing it to crash...
-Original Message-
From: Gix, Lilian (CI/OSR) * [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 November 2005 09:45 AM
To: Serassio Guido; Chris Robertson; squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: RE: AW:
Run squid under some sort of trace program - you'll need to see whats
causing it to crash...
-Original Message-
From: Gix, Lilian (CI/OSR) * [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 November 2005 09:45 AM
To: Serassio Guido; Chris Robertson; squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: RE: AW:
An: Dave Raven; squid-users@squid-cache.org
Betreff: RE: [squid-users] Squid unreachable every hour and 6 minutes.
I already tried to :
- Stop Squid, delete swap.state, restart squid
- Stop Squid, format my cache parition, squid -z, start squid
- change cache_dir ufs /cache 5000 16 256
Run '/usr/local/squid/libexec/ncsa_auth /usr/local/squid/etc/passwd'
Type 'USERNAME PASSWORD'
And see what it says - I suspect you wont get that far though. Once you try
run it it should giv eyou and error
-Original Message-
From: ads squid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10
Run '/usr/local/squid/libexec/ncsa_auth /usr/local/squid/etc/passwd'
Type 'USERNAME PASSWORD'
And see what it says - I suspect you wont get that far though. Once you try
run it it should giv eyou and error
-Original Message-
From: ads squid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10
anything
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Abbas Salehi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 November 2005 12:22 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Urgent Samba / Squid NTLM Auth Problems
Dear sir
I did all of your recommanded from document
anything
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Abbas Salehi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 November 2005 12:22 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Urgent Samba / Squid NTLM Auth Problems
Dear sir
I did all of your recommanded from document
Okay I have an update with more progress - it seems the problem is only to
do with ntlmssp. If I only have a basic authenticator - which looks like the
following, it works perfectly:
auth_param basic program /usr/optec/ntlm_auth.sh basic
auth_param basic children 10
auth_param basic realm
Okay I have an update with more progress - it seems the problem is only to
do with ntlmssp. If I only have a basic authenticator - which looks like the
following, it works perfectly:
auth_param basic program /usr/optec/ntlm_auth.sh basic
auth_param basic children 10
auth_param basic realm
Are there any .core files for squid?
find / -name squid.core -print
It seems like your cache is crashing for some unknown reason - are you not
killing it every few hours somehow? Its highly unlikely that squid is dying
after EXACTLY 66 minutes. Also try using the latest version...
Are there any .core files for squid?
find / -name squid.core -print
It seems like your cache is crashing for some unknown reason - are you not
killing it every few hours somehow? Its highly unlikely that squid is dying
after EXACTLY 66 minutes. Also try using the latest version...
Try use my method posted earlier to search for code files. The fact that
your log suddenly shows squid restarting means it died unexpectedly. If
there is a core file it'll be squids problem - if not its probably something
else causing the problem.
Also, you should try clean out your cache_dir
Try use my method posted earlier to search for code files. The fact that
your log suddenly shows squid restarting means it died unexpectedly. If
there is a core file it'll be squids problem - if not its probably something
else causing the problem.
Also, you should try clean out your cache_dir
options that are possible...
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Aube
Sent: 09 November 2005 09:12 PM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: [squid-users] RE: Urgent Samba / Squid NTLM Auth Problems
Dave Raven wrote:
Okay I have an update with more
options that are possible...
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Aube
Sent: 09 November 2005 09:12 PM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: [squid-users] RE: Urgent Samba / Squid NTLM Auth Problems
Dave Raven wrote:
Okay I have an update with more
Hi all,
I'm currently working on this problem with Ian. It seems like
ntlm_auth is handling the requests fine -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/bin # ./ntlm_auth --username=ianb
--configfile=/usr/local/etc/smb.conf
password:
NT_STATUS_OK: Success (0x0)
It also works through squid when
Hi all,
I'm currently working on this problem with Ian. It seems like
ntlm_auth is handling the requests fine -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/bin # ./ntlm_auth --username=ianb
--configfile=/usr/local/etc/smb.conf
password:
NT_STATUS_OK: Success (0x0)
It also works through squid when
Hello,
How does this login=*:secret option work? I have set up two caches
and put the authentication on the bottom unit, setting a cache peer with
login=*:secret (intead of PASS) and it doesn't work? Well, it all works, but
with no username in the log file at the top...
Any advice?
Hello,
How does this login=*:secret option work? I have set up two caches
and put the authentication on the bottom unit, setting a cache peer with
login=*:secret (intead of PASS) and it doesn't work? Well, it all works, but
with no username in the log file at the top...
Any advice?
with failure... Is there
something I'm missing? Thanks again for the help
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 September 2005 02:40 AM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] SPNEGO patch
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005
with failure... Is there
something I'm missing? Thanks again for the help
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 September 2005 02:40 AM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] SPNEGO patch
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005
Thanks Chris, after running bootstrap.sh and a little tweaking its compiled!
Thanks again
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Chris Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 September 2005 10:35 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: RE: [squid-users] SPNEGO patch
Thanks Chris, after running bootstrap.sh and a little tweaking its compiled!
Thanks again
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Chris Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 September 2005 10:35 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: RE: [squid-users] SPNEGO patch
Hi all,
Is it possible to use digest as a failover to ntlmssp? E.g. in most
configurations with ntlm the cache uses ntlm and then falls back to basic to
authenticate browsers like netscape. Is it possible to make that fallback
use digest authentication-ntlm, eliminating cleartext between
Hi all,
Is it possible to use digest as a failover to ntlmssp? E.g. in most
configurations with ntlm the cache uses ntlm and then falls back to basic to
authenticate browsers like netscape. Is it possible to make that fallback
use digest authentication-ntlm, eliminating cleartext between
Is anyone interested in this? We are willing to pay for the development.
I have read up on it some more and it seems to be possible, but not as easy
as I described below.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Raven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 August 2005 10:22 AM
To: squid-users@squid
Is anyone interested in this? We are willing to pay for the development.
I have read up on it some more and it seems to be possible, but not as easy
as I described below.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Raven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 August 2005 10:22 AM
To: squid-users@squid
Hi all,
A while ago I did a few tests to see why single signon was breaking
through cache peers. It seems like a valid single signon request comes with
a DOMAIN\user format, and no domain once its passed through the peers -
causing it to fail?
I did it a long time ago and didn't really do
Hi all,
A while ago I did a few tests to see why single signon was breaking
through cache peers. It seems like a valid single signon request comes with
a DOMAIN\user format, and no domain once its passed through the peers -
causing it to fail?
I did it a long time ago and didn't really do
Not as far as I know - pretty sure infact. The main reason for this has
something to do with hop to hop gzip, but its getting pretty close. Someone
else can give you more info hopefully
-Original Message-
From: squid squid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 June 2005 07:06 AM
To:
Not as far as I know - pretty sure infact. The main reason for this has
something to do with hop to hop gzip, but its getting pretty close. Someone
else can give you more info hopefully
-Original Message-
From: squid squid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 June 2005 07:06 AM
To:
Afaik the only way is using challenge/response - you'll need winbindd to
communicate with the logon server as the doze session (u/p) isn't in
cleartext. On the note winbindd support is pretty reliable - maybe we can
solve your problem with that?
-Original Message-
From: Phibee Network
Afaik the only way is using challenge/response - you'll need winbindd to
communicate with the logon server as the doze session (u/p) isn't in
cleartext. On the note winbindd support is pretty reliable - maybe we can
solve your problem with that?
-Original Message-
From: Phibee Network
I haven't tested this, but you may just have to fiddle with the regex or my
late night typo's
acl blockedstuff regex ^.*\.(mpe|mov|wmf|asf|divx|mpg|mpeg|mp3|wav|avi|ogg)$
http_access deny blockedstuff
-Original Message-
From: John Walubengo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 June 2005
I haven't tested this, but you may just have to fiddle with the regex or my
late night typo's
acl blockedstuff regex ^.*\.(mpe|mov|wmf|asf|divx|mpg|mpeg|mp3|wav|avi|ogg)$
http_access deny blockedstuff
-Original Message-
From: John Walubengo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 June 2005
Hi all,
I'm having a problem using a combination of myip and cache peer
access. What I want to do is say if a user is pointing to the cache on ip
10.10.5.199 go to cache peer 10.10.0.1 and if its pointing to me on
10.10.5.200 go to the cache peer on 10.10.0.2
To do this I'm using two
Hi all,
I'm having a problem using a combination of myip and cache peer
access. What I want to do is say if a user is pointing to the cache on ip
10.10.5.199 go to cache peer 10.10.0.1 and if its pointing to me on
10.10.5.200 go to the cache peer on 10.10.0.2
To do this I'm using two
Yes, and if I configure both to use round robin or use both with icp they
both work.. Its something to do with the _access and myip
I hope to have more info tomorrow though
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 April 2005 09:52 PM
To: Dave Raven
Yes, and if I configure both to use round robin or use both with icp they
both work.. Its something to do with the _access and myip
I hope to have more info tomorrow though
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 April 2005 09:52 PM
To: Dave Raven
Hi all,
I have a rather serious problem and cant think of any way to
solve it. I have a cache hierarchy with TWO cache boxes running on different
internet links at the core, then 10 regional caches peering to the top. The
reason I say two, is because one link is for a specific set
Hi all,
I have a rather serious problem and cant think of any way to
solve it. I have a cache hierarchy with TWO cache boxes running on different
internet links at the core, then 10 regional caches peering to the top. The
reason I say two, is because one link is for a specific set
-Original Message-
From: Kinkie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 January 2005 11:34 AM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Challenge/Response with Cache Peers (NTLM)
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 21:26 +0200, Dave Raven wrote:
Hi all,
I've been testing the behavior
-Original Message-
From: Kinkie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 January 2005 11:34 AM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Challenge/Response with Cache Peers (NTLM)
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 21:26 +0200, Dave Raven wrote:
Hi all,
I've been testing the behavior
Hi all,
I've been testing the behavior of Challenge/Response today with
cache peers. the versions etc are not relevant as I have Challenge/Response
and BASIC working fine if I point directly to the unit. Below is a makeshift
diagram of how I've set this up now:
-
Hi all,
I've been testing the behavior of Challenge/Response today with
cache peers. the versions etc are not relevant as I have Challenge/Response
and BASIC working fine if I point directly to the unit. Below is a makeshift
diagram of how I've set this up now:
-
Hi all,
Is there any way that I might direct requests to different cache
peers based on a group reply from an NTLM authentication? I wish to make a
certain group go through one peer, and another group through the other...
Are there any other ways of doing this?
attachment: winmail.dat
Look into NTLM with squid, there is a lot of info on the site
(www.squid-cache.org)
-Original Message-
From: Hiu Yen Onn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 August 2004 07:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [squid-users] Uses a Windows NT authentication domain.
hi,
i am new to squid,
Absolutely, look into the possibility of a redirector like squidGuard as
well as using basic auth. You can find more about it on
www.squid-cache.org - you'll need to create password files etc., but its not
terribly difficult, and its very possible.
-Original Message-
From: Barry Rumsey
I suspect the problem is that you allow non-authenticated traffic as well -
you need to disallow all http access by default and allow authenticated
users - something like this:
acl NCSA proxy_auth REQUIRED
http_access allow NCSA
http_access deny all
-Original Message-
From: Barry Rumsey
That's squid connecting to the foreign websites on port 80 (http). If you
want to firewall it allow squid to setup a state out on port 80 (make sure
its statefull), and firewall everything else in...
You don't have a security problem with it connected from a random port to
port 80 on another
I do, I have been unable to get it working with the latest version though -
so I'm using a snapshot from the page. It appears to be perfectly compliant
so it should work with Symantec - as far as I know the only problem is with
Trends IWSS.
-Original Message-
From: Christoph Nagelreiter
splitting it etc?
Thanks again
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 August 2004 02:56 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users] LDAP groups with a redirector
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Dave Raven wrote:
I have been looking
Add login=PASS to the end of your cache peer line, this will instruct it
to pass up any login information in the request.
-Original Message-
From: Swaroop Shere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 August 2004 09:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [squid-users] hierarchy problerms
I'm not what you would call a Fedora pro, but I suspect you will need to
chroot to the enviroment in order to run the squid -k reconfigure... E.g.
chroot /wka usr/local/squidSTABLE6/sbin/squid -k reconfigure
?
-Original Message-
From: Rick G. Kilgore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20
As long as your iptables rules only affect traffic that's not destined to
your squid port, you should be fine
-Original Message-
From: Steve Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 August 2004 04:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [squid-users] Transparent config OK if not used?
I
Hi all,
I have been looking into the group_ldap acl's in squid, and they
look great. My problem is, are there any redirectors or ways to pass the
group to a redirector, that will act on these ldap groups. Or ones with ldap
support? At the moment I'm using squidguard and its not looking
Hi all,
I have ldap pretty much fully working, but I'm wondering if its
possible to search through multiple domains, under one AD forest (ldap
connection)?
Other web cache's seem to have problems with this is squid able to do it? It
is in Native mode so we have to use Kerberos to connect
Hello all,
Saw some mention on the lists of a patch needed to use IWSS, is it
possible to just change an option on the Trend server to fix it? Or do we
defiantly need the patch? If so, please can someone tell me how to get the
patch - on the list it says email protected for the contact
Hello all,
Saw some mention on the lists of a patch needed to use IWSS, is it
possible to just change an option on the Trend server to fix it? Or do we
defiantly need the patch? If so, please can someone tell me how to get the
patch - on the list it says email protected for the contact
the request to go through BOTH servers...
Are my assumptions correct?
Thanks
Dave Raven
Hi all,
I've been trying to build squid with ICAP support lately (applied
the patch to the latest squid) and with the squid-icap-2.5-200404051745
snapshot and had no success (lots of automake/autoconf errors with the
snapshot and a lot of errors in icap_common.c with the patch). Is anyone
] Error 1
Any help would be MOST appreciated, thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Dave Raven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 April 2004 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [squid-users] ICAP build
Hi all,
I've been trying to build squid with ICAP support lately
Hi all,
I have my ldap auth working with users and all now, and -f
sAMAccountName=%s works perfect, but I need to also check that the user is a
member of iNet Users. Now my first guess is that maybe its not working
because I don't have quotes around iNet users - but I can't get it to
using so much memory ?
It seems to have only started post ldap auth a few days
ago... But that's not definate
Thanks
Dave Raven
Hi all,
I have a stupid question with ldap_auth,
its really a squid question - when
I use a user of test\test to get in the
ldap domain it removes the \ on the
authenticate parameters line, if I escape it
(\\) it puts two backslashes - I've tried
To bind a search user - I have to use the test\ part or the login fails and
I can't change the AD server..
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 February 2004 01:40 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid_ldap_auth
-
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 February 2004 02:21 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [squid-users] Squid_ldap_auth stupid question
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Dave Raven wrote:
To bind a search user - I have to use the test\ part or the login fails
and
I
Hi all,
I have a need with squid_ldap_auth,
and am entirely unsure how to get it
working..
I need to autheticate users in one OU,
but only if they are a member of a
group in another OU --
This would be the user:
CN=Test
BSD - ldap directory is an AD server running 2000
-Original Message-
From: Lewars, Mitchell (EM, PTL) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 February 2004 01:55 PM
To: 'Dave Raven'
Subject: RE: [squid-users] squid_ldap_auth
Are you running on Linux ?
-Original Message-
From: Dave
Agreed - info from cache.log and try recompile your squid now with bsd5
-Original Message-
From: Elsen Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 February 2004 03:08 PM
To: Evren Yurtesen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [squid-users] squid 2.5.STABLE4 + FreeBSD 5.x = crash after a
while...
check cache.log
tail cache.log and mail if you can figure it out from there..
--Dave
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Hoffer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 5:31 PM
Subject: [squid-users] Squid
: Squid will not stay running. I start it up with
:
if people are pointing to squid.
not transparently.
Then it will log all requests as it does with http.
--Dave
- Original Message -
From: darlene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 6:29 PM
Subject: [squid-users] Ftp help
:
: Is it possible to log
acl aol dst 64.12.163.198
http_access allow aol
dont make aol go through authentication
you probably find your users aren't auth'ing
with aol... I assume they have multiple ips though
so...
- Original Message -
From: Ampugnani, Fernando [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi all,
Having some serious troubles with a clients squid box,
its running on FreeBSD-4.7-RELEASE-p9; and I've
just installed the squid through ports, -STABLE1 +
all the patches in ports Makefile.
26229/26624/133120 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
23620 mbufs allocated to
98 matches
Mail list logo
