Re: [squid-users] requests per second

2012-03-12 Thread David B.
Hi Jenny, Reverse proxy or not ? We're using squid as reverse proxy et only that. We can achieve about 2K RPS with our boxes and this server isn't overloaded... In fact, it's common hardware, like mono dual core Xéon, some RAM and a poor RAID 1 disk array without BBU. I think 5K RPS is possible.

Re: [squid-users] requests per second

2012-03-12 Thread David B.
Hi, It's only a reverse proxy cache, not a proxy. This is different. We use squid only for images. Squid : 3.1.x OS : debian 64 bits Le 12/03/2012 12:44, Student University a écrit : Hi David You achieve 2K with what version of squid ,,, do you have any special configuration tweaks ,,,

[squid-users] [statusIfComplete: Request not yet fully sent PROPFIND ...] Should I worry ?

2011-10-18 Thread David B.
Hi squid-users, We're using squid as reverse proxy on several boxes since several months All seems to be working great. But i can find theses on me logs. I can't remenber when this have show up. 2011/10/18 11:39:05| statusIfComplete: Request not yet fully sent PROPFIND

[squid-users] Squid 3.1 and strange Bad header encountered error

2010-06-08 Thread David B.
Hi Squid users, I think I need some help to understand a new error with squid. :( I've got several squid boxes, all in 3.0 branch (reverse proxy cache). All is ok. Now, I've tried to upgrade one (and only one boxe) to 3.1 branch (Starting Squid Cache version 3.1.3 for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu...).

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.1 and strange Bad header encountered error

2010-06-08 Thread David B.
Le 08/06/2010 11:12, Amos Jeffries a écrit : David B. wrote: Hi Squid users, I think I need some help to understand a new error with squid. :( I've got several squid boxes, all in 3.0 branch (reverse proxy cache). All is ok. Now, I've tried to upgrade one (and only one boxe) to 3.1 branch

[squid-users] New squid3 error : DiskThreadsDiskFile::openDone: (2) No such file or directory

2010-01-22 Thread David B.
Hi squids users, I've made somes changes to my squid boxes (new fresh server, more powerful). All seems to be ok, but now i've got some strange errors (from time to time) on cache.log. Exemple : 2010/01/15 18:59:47| DiskThreadsDiskFile::openDone: (2) No such file or directory 2010/01/15 18:59:47|

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 reverse proxy Failed to select source strange errors

2009-11-24 Thread David B.
Amos Jeffries a écrit : This is quite strange, I think I'm misunderstanding something. I'm using squid as a reverse proxy. I understand. Clients (internet people surfing on my website) should connect to squid boxes to retrieve static content. Squid send the right file or connect

[squid-users] Squid3 reverse proxy Failed to select source strange errors

2009-11-23 Thread David B.
Hi Squid users, We're using squid3 as a reverse proxy on several boxes and he's working quite well. Squid configuration is quite simple : cache_peer X.X.X.X parent 80 0 no-query originserver no-digest cache_peer Y.Y.Y.Y parent 80 0 no-query originserver no-digest cache_peer_domain X.X.X.X

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 reverse proxy Failed to select source strange errors

2009-11-23 Thread David B.
Amos Jeffries a écrit : [snip] Exemple : 2009/11/23 08:36:28| Failed to select source for 'http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/416/greysanatomypromotional.jpg' 2009/11/23 08:36:28| always_direct = 0 2009/11/23 08:36:28|never_direct = 0 2009/11/23 08:36:28|timedout = 0 [snip]

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 reverse proxy Failed to select source strange errors

2009-11-23 Thread David B.
Hi mike, Mike Marchywka a écrit : [snip] Normal website attacks. One of the benefits of using Squid is to prevent these resource wasters getting near the backend processors. Failed to select source is good news. You might also want to occasionally scan the access.log to see if any

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 and lots of FIN_WAIT1

2009-11-19 Thread David B.
Hi Squid users, [Snip] I have not seen FIN_WAIT1 before, but often see FIN_WAIT like this when Squid is receiving a lot of connections. I think its due to squid using sockets for short times (non-persistent connections) and moving on. The system TCP timeouts are much longer. I think i've

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 and lots of FIN_WAIT1

2009-11-19 Thread David B.
Amos Jeffries a écrit : Wonderful. Was the timeout a default LVS setting? if so what exact LVS device/software was it so we can document the fix here. Cheers Amos Nop, default LVS timeout is ok, ours were very low. Défault : Timeout (tcp tcpfin udp): 900 120 300 Faultly values : Timeout

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 and lots of FIN_WAIT1

2009-11-18 Thread David B.
Amos Jeffries a écrit : [snip] Perhaps my load is too high and i need to tune kernel via sysctl, but i can't figure what to do. For now, i've tried several things and i can't solved this issue. You may want to check: * persistent connections is turned on (squid.conf) On by

Re: [squid-users] Squid3 and lots of FIN_WAIT1

2009-11-17 Thread David B.
Hi Amos, Amos Jeffries a écrit : On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:40:16 +0100, David B. haazel...@gmail.com wrote: [Snip] I have not seen FIN_WAIT1 before, but often see FIN_WAIT like this when Squid is receiving a lot of connections. I think its due to squid using sockets for short times (non

[squid-users] Squid3 and lots of FIN_WAIT1

2009-11-16 Thread David B.
Hi Squid users, We're using squid as a reverse proxy cache. Server (debian lenny) running squid (from lenny stable / squid/3.0.STABLE8) seems to have some stange behaviour. For example, we've got lots of TIN_WAIT1 TCP Connexions and we can't figure why. :( # netstat -na | wc -l 20065 # netstat