Hi,
Friday, November 7, 2008, 9:48:16 PM, you wrote:
> File a bug report, preferably with a stack backtrace of the error.
Hm, since we use aufs cache_dir type, we cannot provide a stack
backtrace... :(
Dietmar
--
NetCologne Gesellschaft fuer Telekommunikation mbH
Am Coloneum 9, 50829 Koeln
Ges
Hi,
we are using Squid 3.0 STABLE9. Once a day, we get a
2008/11/06 22:28:07| assertion failed: store_client.cc:430: "STORE_DISK_CLIENT
== getType()"
with a restart of Squid. Is this a known bug, can we do anything here?
Thanks,
Dietmar
--
NetCologne Gesellschaft fuer Telekommunikation mbH
A
Thursday, October 2, 2008, 12:44:01 PM, you wrote:
>> Bug 2447:
>> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2447
> Not really sure it's the same bug, but perhaps related.
> Please get a stack trace of your crash and file a new bug report.
Until now with the patch applied, the two systems a
Hi,
we have latest Squid 3 STABLE9 running... this night we saw it dying:
2008/09/30 23:33:27| idnsGrokReply: Malformed DNS response
FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying.
2008/09/30 23:33:31| storeDirWriteCleanLogs: Starting...
2008/09/30 23:33:31| WARNING: Closing open FD 10
2008/09/30 23
Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 3:35:49 AM, you wrote:
> Squid 3.0 the option changed name to --with-filedescriptors=N
Thank you! Now it works.
Is there any document where I can verify the other configure options I
used, whether they are valid any more or have been changed?
Regards,
Dietmar
Monday, September 29, 2008, 3:02:35 PM, you wrote:
> Do you have a max_filedescriptors line in your squid conf?
no...
Thanks,
Dietmar
Hello,
we are using Squid3 Stable9.
Although I compiled it with the option "--with-maxfd=4096" and added a
"umlimit -HSn 4096" to the beginning of the squid start script, it
only allows 1024 fds:
2008/09/29 14:08:05| Starting Squid Cache version 3.0.STABLE9 for
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu...
2008/
Thursday, September 18, 2008, 2:27:58 PM, you wrote:
> Pretty much. I've just applied the patch to 3.0 codebase, so it will be
> out in the next snapshot, or the patch is listed at:
>http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.0/changesets/
cool, thank you. Just applied it and it seems to work fi
Hi,
Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 5:28:45 PM, you wrote:
> This is a known bug:
> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2391
Thank you for the quick reply.
> I have not investigated it myself, but the recommendation in the bug
> report is to remove the assertion as it is incorrect.
D
ID 11415
2008/09/17 14:21:59| Starting Squid Cache version 3.0.STABLE9 for
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu...
...
Is that a known bug, or can we do something against that?
Thanks and regards,
Dietmar Braun
10 matches
Mail list logo