Re: [squid-users] Allow a client to only one https site and path

: De: Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz Asunto: Re: [squid-users] Allow a client to only one https site and path Para: squid-users@squid-cache.org Fecha: Martes 19 de Marzo de 2013 7:30 On 20/03/2013 12:36 a.m., Jannis Kafkoulas wrote: Hi, I'm using squid 2.7 on RHEL 5.6 and I have

[squid-users] Allow a client to only one https site and path

Hi, I'm using squid 2.7 on RHEL 5.6 and I have following issue: I want to restrict a client to accessing a specific https site and herein only a specific root path (and sub directories). So I tried this: acl restr_client src 10.1.1.100/32 acl restr_dom dstdomain www.example.com acl xyz

Re: [squid-users] How to trick splay trees?

. ... thanks --- El Lun 30/7/12, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz escribió: De: Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz Asunto: Re: [squid-users] How to trick splay trees? Para: squid-users@squid-cache.org Fecha: Lunes 30 de Julio de 2012 15:25 On 31/07/2012 1:25 a.m., Jannis Kafkoulas wrote: Hi

Re: [squid-users] How to trick splay trees?

Fecha: Martes 31 de Julio de 2012 5:42 On 31/07/2012 9:48 p.m., Jannis Kafkoulas wrote: Thanks for the quick answer! Now I see that I didn't express myself precisely enough :-( to also go via  cache_peer par-alt. wasn't meant as an alternative (either or) but as as well as the domain .fa

[squid-users] How to trick splay trees?

Hi, (I use squid 2.7. STABLE9 on RedHat EL 5.6) Following problem: I have following dstdomains defined going to par-std and par-alt cache_peers respectively: acl alt dstdomain .fa-intracomp.net acl std dstdomain .intracomp.com Now I'd like abc.intracomp.com to also go via cache_peer

RE: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs?

Croitoru elie...@ec.hadorhabaac.com An: squid-users@squid-cache.org Gesendet: Samstag, den 30. April 2011, 12:39:56 Uhr Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs? On 30/04/2011 11:58, Jannis Kafkoulas wrote: OK, I see! Thanks very

AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs?

? On 29/04/11 22:02, Jannis Kafkoulas wrote: Unfortunately I couldn't find any directives in squid.conf relating to any dns matter. But I have an idea why squid has to set up a nslookup: We use also ip addresses with acls for destinations. So if squid receives an URL name it has to get it resolved

AW: AW: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs?

Betreff: Re: AW: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs? On 29/04/11 01:56, Jannis Kafkoulas wrote: Of cource Eliezer, thanks a lot! Yes, of course, I mean dns lookup by resolve. (It has been set up by an external company) The chain is very simple

[squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs?

Hi, We have a proxy chain of 3 squids (v2.7, RHEL5). In my opinion only the last one needs really to resolve the URLs name in order to send the request directly to the web servers ip address in the Internet. Would it also work if the first two proxies wouldn't resolve? And how can that be

AW: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs?

Von: Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ec.hadorhabaac.com An: squid-users@squid-cache.org Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 28. April 2011, 13:51:17 Uhr Betreff: Re: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs? On 28/04/2011 12:25, Jannis Kafkoulas wrote: Hi, We have