On 6/24/2010 1:45 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:05:04 -0500, Seann Clark
nombran...@tsukinokage.net wrote:
now, and I am looking for suggestions from the list on improving
performance. This is on a home system, which does not have a large
user base. I am
Amos Jeffries wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:05:04 -0500, Seann Clark
nombran...@tsukinokage.net wrote:
All,
I have been playing with/tweaking/breaking my squid for a few months
now, and I am looking for suggestions from the list on improving
performance. This is on a home
All,
I have been playing with/tweaking/breaking my squid for a few months
now, and I am looking for suggestions from the list on improving
performance. This is on a home system, which does not have a large user
base. I am running a Dual Xeon 2.0 Ghz system with 2 gigs ram, 120 Gigs
hard
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Seann Clark wrote:
All,
I have been working over the past few days to manage a rather
large swap file, that isn't reducing when I attempt to rotate the
file. I am sure that I can prune this file's total size down but I am
not sure the best way to tackle
Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 24.04.2009, Seann Clark wrote:
Fedora 9, ext3 filesystem
^^^
Besides all the tips you received from Amos, you could maybe consider to
mount the ext3 partitions with the noatime and data=writeback options
to improve latency. Depending
All,
I am looking for ideas on ways to avoid this, as the tuning guides I
have found lead me all over the place. What I am seeing is over time the
cache starts to slow down from being lightning fast to being ok, to it
taking 1-3 minutes to decide to load, and I know it is tunable on this
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Seann Clark wrote:
All,
I am looking for ideas on ways to avoid this, as the tuning guides
I have found lead me all over the place. What I am seeing is over
time the cache starts to slow down from being lightning fast to being
ok, to it taking 1-3 minutes to decide
All,
This may be a long shot with squid, I do know commercial proxies can
do this, but I want to do something simple regarding google. I haven't
found much online for it yet, but I am wondering if anyone has come up
with a way to force google to use only safe search options? What I mean
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 04:46:18PM -0600, Seann Clark wrote:
I am looking for a squid based solution for a problem I have.
Why? Why don't you fix the backend servers to reply with the correct
value?
The idea with the proxy is to go internet -- squid
All,
I am looking for a squid based solution for a problem I have. I
have a squid reverse proxy sitting in front of three web servers, set up
so I can test and QA each server by itself without a problem, and yet
still server to the www site as if they were one. While this works fine
Amos Jeffries wrote:
All,
I am looking for a squid based solution for a problem I have. I
have a squid reverse proxy sitting in front of three web servers, set up
so I can test and QA each server by itself without a problem, and yet
still server to the www site as if they were one. While
11 matches
Mail list logo
