Re: [squid-users] multiple http_port names

2011-06-10 Thread errno
On Friday, June 10, 2011 02:20:49 AM errno wrote: * the single instance listening on multiple ip:port http_ports: 192.168.1.2:80, 192.168.1.2:8080, 192.168.1.2:80 and 192.168.1.2:8080 Damn, that should have said: * the single instance listening on multiple ip:port http_ports: 192.168.1.2:80

Re: [squid-users] multiple http_port names

2011-06-10 Thread errno
On Friday, June 10, 2011 07:33:07 AM Amos Jeffries wrote: snip ... behaved as intended: when clients went through the http_port listener 192.168.2.2:80, the tcp_outgoing_address worked as expected, wherein http://www.whatismyip.com displayed 192.168.2.2 rather than 192.168.1.1. *

[squid-users] multiple http_port names

2011-06-09 Thread errno
I've got squid conf that looks a bit like the following snippet: # ... acl ip-192.168.1.2 myip 192.168.1.2 http_port 192.168.1.2:80 name=ip-192.168.1.2 http_port 192.168.1.2:8080 name=ip-192.168.1.2 tcp_outgoing_address 192.168.1.2 ip-192.168.1 # ... Question: do those http_port directives

Re: [squid-users] ip aliased multi-instanced squid

2011-06-03 Thread errno
On Thursday, June 02, 2011 01:03:06 AM Amos Jeffries wrote: On 02/06/11 19:41, errno wrote: Just to confirm: If I have multiple ip aliases assigned to the same physical nic, will there still be port conflicts on an ip (aliased) based multi-instanced squid server? There is rarely

Re: [squid-users] testing, squid users can you get this?

2011-06-03 Thread errno
On Friday, June 03, 2011 02:10:09 PM MrNicholsB wrote: anyone getting my mails? affirmative

[squid-users] ip aliased multi-instanced squid

2011-06-02 Thread errno
Just to confirm: If I have multiple ip aliases assigned to the same physical nic, will there still be port conflicts on an ip (aliased) based multi-instanced squid server? For example: eth0 - 192.196.0.2 eth0:1 - 192.196.0.3 eth0:2 - 192.196.0.4 squid_192.196.0.2.conf # ... http_port

[squid-users] per-user max connection limit?

2011-05-30 Thread errno
'm still getting my bearings w/ squid, so apologies if I'm asking particularly stupid questions. Is it possible to configure a scenario that facilitates per-user max connection limits? For instance, user1 might have a max connection limit of 10, while user3 has a max connection limit of 50;

Re: [squid-users] multiple squid confs? multiple machines, single auth db?

2011-05-11 Thread errno
Thankyou for the advice and pointers, much appreciated! On Tuesday, May 10, 2011 08:49:44 PM Amos Jeffries wrote: On Tue, 10 May 2011 15:10:12 -0700, errno wrote: I'll be doing major upgrades to a few of our old systems that are running older versions of squid (2.5 era).

[squid-users] multiple squid confs? multiple machines, single auth db?

2011-05-10 Thread errno
I'll be doing major upgrades to a few of our old systems that are running older versions of squid (2.5 era). On each of these boxes, we have a largish number of aliased virt ips. In the past it appeared that squid needed a separate .conf file for each ip; but we'll be moving to squid 3.1... is