/03/2013 8:20 p.m., jiluspo wrote:
http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/udp_incoming_address/ was been
buggy
and been around in ubuntu bug report.
udp_incoming_address doesn't work.
The only bug I see in Ubuntu about that directive is that it causes DNS
packets to go to the address
-Original Message-
From: Luigi Vianello [mailto:lviane...@ambientesc.it]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 5:18 PM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: [squid-users] problems with a site
Hi,
I have some problems with the following site:
http://www.wasteservmalta.com/
I'd like to
Good day,
If squid3 configured with cache_dir aufs per process would they
share to other process?
, March 09, 2013 3:03 PM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid3 SMP aufs storage/process
On 03/08/2013 11:21 PM, jiluspo wrote:
If squid3 configured with cache_dir aufs per process would they
share to other process?
No. Ufs-based store modules, including aufs
Good day,
Is there other way we can multicast in localhost without creating
virtual Ethernet for additional ip?.
Currently running multiple instances.
Good day,
I was hoping where I could find users/developers squid's CPU
profiling and benchmarks was published. I'd like to know where squid is more
hungrier.
I did some test which kind of unclear for me to get conclusion. Currently at
connection established vs request/sec.
this will be hanging around. I'll debug them later
but for now I'll just off to multicast and use 2 instance peering.
-Original Message-
From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 6:47 AM
To: jiluspo
Subject: Re: [squid-users] localhost multicast
On 6/03
Good day,
If I understand correctly. Storied was a port from storeurl with
some modification to fit to squid3. Therefore same with storeurl issue. We
found the content in cache and hit but we cannot revalidate(if url is
mismatch but storied matched) then content be freed/deleted and store
Good day,
We have been using storeurl of squid2 works perfect for several
years.
But it came to the point where CPU is congested. After squid3
storeid was finished we tested, but we can't deploy due to SMP storage
limitation (http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SmpScale). With
http://td8xg88h78lu.com/postdumper.php
lots of random .com domain with postdumper.php, I wonder why they stay in
file descriptor where this domain cannot be resolve.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
We are caching large files only when it reach to around between 2TB and
2.5TB(cant be sure bec. Its from graph) store_swap_size became negative.
I thought swap file is corrupt so its been deleted and rebuild. But still
the same.
squid-2.HEAD-20110824
Uname -a
Linux localhost 2.6.32-24-server
How to make them sibling to each other.
Does it needs name tagging or soft of?
It says cache_peer 127.0.0.1 used more than once or some kind of(I forgot,
currently just use 2 instances).
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be
Remedy I have is making name in host file. Is there any other squid
configurations that I might need?
-Original Message-
From: jiluspo [mailto:jilu...@smartbro.net]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 8:42 PM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: [squid-users] multiple instances
(valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=yes squid -Nd1)
2011/10/12 01:25:38| Asking valgrind for memleaks
==9877== 36 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 606 of
1,292
==9877==at 0x4026864: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==9877==by 0x407BFD5: cap_init (in
-users] squid 2.7 ... memory leak?
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:32:00 +0800, jiluspo wrote:
(valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=yes squid -Nd1)
2011/10/12 01:25:38| Asking valgrind for memleaks
==9877== 36 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 606
of
1,292
==9877
If via off how squid can detect forwarding loops? Any other alternatives
than denying squid ip as source?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
squid running stable and we don't need the x-cache(or perhaps hide the
proxy)..
is it ok to remove from the source code?
i'm minimising the acl therefore I coudnt use header_access.
by the way how many percent would reduce if we use external acl?
where:
cpu usage: [mrtg:40] [top:60]
acl src
Thanks I'll try patching kernel then.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Beverley a...@andybev.com
To: jiluspo jilu...@smartbro.net
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2011 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] TOS from remote to squid(2 series)
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 22:43 +0800, jiluspo wrote
squid running 2 instances(iptables balanced).
peer cache digest both sibling on each other
running cache_mem only
for overloaded server(61k req/min) should we create 2 http ports for peer
and for tproxy?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and
squid can set TOS but why squid cant get TOS value from remote server or
pass them on miss.
patching kernel for geting the TOS value and pass to squid is the only
solution? or it was chosen for highest performance...
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by
.
according to source code initial tos=0;
there are some patches called preserve tos miss but kernel(linux) needs to
be patched.
does kernel really need to patch in order to pass the TOS value from kernel
to squid?
- Original Message -
From: Hasanen AL-Bana hasa...@gmail.com
To: jiluspo
On Sat, 2011-04-23 at 20:36 +0800, jiluspo wrote:
remote servers I mean http web servers TOS.
I already know about peers in fact current squid(as of 04/24/11) TOS are
not
being marked peer(digest or icp) hit when local miss.
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3202
AFAIK squid 2
whats going on witht this bind thingi
2011/03/10 19:59:26| commBind: Cannot bind socket FD 1160 family 2 to
0.0.0.0 port 0: (98) Address already in use
2011/03/10 19:59:26| comm_fdopen6: FD 1160: TPROXY comm_ips_bind_rem()
failed: errno 98 ((98) Address already in use)
2011/03/10 19:59:26|
each drive has 8 io
(open,close,cancel,write,read,unlink,check_callback,queue) and additional 4
for squid
running at 6 drives(COSS,AUFS per drive) 32K max/min-size.
for lowest latency we could say async-io to ((8 * 6)+4 ) = 52 ...
overloading.
so i've doubled+4. now its 100 ...overloading.
what would happen if we tproxy selected(by PBR) server ips? what sort of
trouble i might facing to...?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Does squid honors the DNS TTL if it happens true ttl is lower than
positive_dns_ttl ?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
with 127.0.0.1 might require tuning with net.local.stream.* and would
consume more memory if set high.
so far i've noticed with 127.0.0.1 browsing seems like faster than the
other, but im not sure what I've missed.
rdr on em1 inet proto tcp from any to ! (em1) port = http - 127.0.0.1 port
cache/no-cache directive can do both reply and request?
acl test1 rep_header .
cache deny test1
acl test2 req_header .
cache deny test2
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Does anybody have issues with ninja saga connection in PVP.
Clients cant join/connect PVP in ninja saga(flash based facebook games)
other than PVP ninja saga works fine.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
I've seen few of this in cache.log
How can we pull out the URL/storeurl of this files that are missing.
2011/03/01 23:49:21| storeAufsOpenDone: (2) No such file or directory
2011/03/01 23:49:21|/cache03/00/69/69BB
2011/03/01 23:49:56| storeAufsOpenDone: (2) No such file or directory
Linux local 2.6.32-24-server #39-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 28 06:21:40 UTC 2010
x86_64 GNU/Linux
@kern.log
warning: `squid' uses 32-bit capabilities (legacy support in use)
I thought I did compile squid as 64bit?
'--with-large-files' would still be needed?
--
This message has been scanned for
both uses 2 ethernet.
I tested both with ICMP UDP latency and found out routing mode has higher
latency compared to bridge.
difference about .300ms.
does routing really causes delay?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be
purpose is not to revalidate.(just let them purge if cache is full)
some servers use as very old date to force content to expire.
server reply has no etag.
their servers has never been replied with 304(revalidation will never be
happen even http 1.0).
sometims when you ask for IMS you will be
acc. to http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4
2.6.32 to 2.6.34 have bridging issues on some systems
what are these systems.
does anybody could confirm ubuntu 10.10 x64 has same issue?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to
what happen to content when reach to above max age in refresh patterh...
would be remove from the cache? if so instead of removing can we revalidate
them into ims?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
ok then content revalidated ... so the content age should be change? if so
then the content's header will be change then?
- Original Message -
From: Terry. te...@list.dnsbed.com
To: jiluspo jilu...@smartbro.net
Cc: squid Users squid-users@squid-cache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 22
would it still be applicable for a low latency network?
what are the pros and cons?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
happy valentines day,
tproxy on wccpv2 L2 vs triangle routing(router mode tproxy)
single cache, gigatbit ethernet. which do you think would get high req/sec?
and smaller overhead.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
clients - squid - router1
router1 - squid - client
with router1, squid, client on same subset.
router1 need to be distination routed to squid.
the tproxy setup fails but redirect port works fine when
client -squid- router1
router- clients
Linux ubuntu 2.6.32-25-generic-pae #45-Ubuntu SMP Sat
as for feedback of http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4 works fine
with bridge mode and router mode without NAT.
Linux ubuntu 2.6.32-25-generic-pae #45-Ubuntu SMP Sat Oct 16 21:01:33 UTC
2010 i686 GNU/Linux
iptables v1.4.4
libcap-dev 1:2.17-2ubuntu1
libcap2
Would be posible to run tproxy in single ethernet, same subset of gateway,
squid box, clients(squid box as gateway)?
I'm trying to run tproxy at lab on ubuntu 10.04, I dont know what else
missing/wrong. squidbox as gateway works fine without tproxy.
This private IPs would be replaced with
41 matches
Mail list logo
