I'm not sure if there is a problem.the only thing I can think about is
are they using the same port?
also keep in mind that squid 3.x is still in development.
what does /var/log/squid/access say when it shuts down?
-Original Message-
From: Eric Kahklen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
590F5-ACF0-4A63-A11E-8CF3F80C3
AA9.jpg lonsdale\mwestern DIRECT/207.46.248.112 image/jpeg
1076636556.065221 10.160.0.200 TCP_MISS/200 2393 GET
http://windowsmedia.com/CAPS/ImagesContent/75214D0A-92A2-4E22-9952-1B6271642
3DD.jpg lonsdale\mwestern DIRECT/207.46.196.100 image/jpeg
1076636556.107
m/CAPS/ImagesContent/A39590F5-ACF0-4A63-A11E-8CF3F80C3
AA9.jpg lonsdale\mwestern DIRECT/207.46.248.112 image/jpeg
1076636556.065221 10.160.0.200 TCP_MISS/200 2393 GET
http://windowsmedia.com/CAPS/ImagesContent/75214D0A-92A2-4E22-9952-1B6271642
3DD.jpg lonsdale\mwestern DIRECT/207.46.196.10
that
takes your fancy), select an audio link and wait
squid 2.5_Stable3
access_log:
1076636556.018221 10.160.0.200 TCP_MISS/200 2799 GET
http://windowsmedia.com/CAPS/ImagesContent/A39590F5-ACF0-4A63-A11E-8CF3F80C3
AA9.jpg lonsdale\mwestern DIRECT/207.46.248.112 image/jpeg
1076636556.065
you might also like http://www.glob.com.au/windowsupdate_cache/ - we are
sucessfully using it with no dramas...
-Original Message-
From: Elsen Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 8:57 PM
To: Emilio Salgari; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [squid-users] windows u
I'm no expert on ACLs either. we have two people here who want clean
internet access when everyone else is behind squid and no way out. we
simply gave them a NAT address by using the MAC address option in our DHCP
server. they get a DNS server, and a NATable address...
obviously not a squ
Hi All,
We have a perfect squid 2.5 stable 3 setup with NTLM auth working like a
bought one. however, quite a number of other lazy(or something) site don't
have a proxy setup at all and must simply NAT out or something.
how would i make the auto detect proxy setting work in IE so that it finds
Hi All,
We are currently looking at going AD on win2003 (aargh, not sure i want to
do this). at the moment we have a Winnt 4 domain and squid is nicely auth
against the domain controllers with NTLM. my question is can i continue to
use NTLM agains't win2k3 AD domain (or forest i think it's calle
true. but isn't he suggesting:
Client <---compressed data> squid
there's only one problemm with that idea (which i might add is a good one).
the browser has no idea about any compression of any kind (as far as i
know). you'd need an appl on your browsing machine to undo the compression
and feed it to the browser.
sounds like a complicated setup.
-Orig
Hi All,
just a note and a big thanks. did a tcpdump and found out it called itself
WebCapture.
so:
#allow no auth of adobe web capture
acl pdfgrab browser WebCapture
http_access allow pdfgrab
worked like a bought one. thankyou to all who helped with this problem.
Regards
Matthew
-Origin
Hi All,
just a note and a big thanks. did a tcpdump and found out it called itself
WebCapture.
so:
#allow no auth of adobe web capture
acl pdfgrab browser WebCapture
http_access allow pdfgrab
worked like a bought one. thankyou to all who helped with this problem.
Regards
Matthew
-Origin
hehe. yep i mean basic. sorry.
ta for tcpdump.
interesting idea. i might put basic first and see if IE takes the best
option, not the last option in the list (if it makes a diference that is)
and then see if adobe takes the basic option. then i'll be set.
i'll follow it up with adobe anyway
i don't think the developers if squid would agree with you on that one. :)
>Quite frankly, if you can use NTLM auth, do it. That is the one feature
>in IE that I wish other browsers would emulate.
http://devel.squid-cache.org/ntlm/client_proxy_protocol.html seems to think
that 'it couldn't ge
Hi Robert,
>you can simply allow adobe based on a browser regex before your auth
>triggering http_access lines.
that's what i'm hoping to do to get around this problem. have you managed
to do this? i've not experimented yet as i didn't know what adobe tells
squid what browser it is. i'm going
9pm? isn't it time you stopped working? :)thanks for the advice. i'll
post if i find the cure...
M
-Original Message-
From: Adam Aube [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 11 July 2003 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [squid-users] ntlm won't prompt
>damn. sorry. aa
idiot me re: last message.
>The IP of the client doesn't matter. All that matters is that you
>put in the IP addresses of the Adobe PDF capture servers. This will
>allow anyone to access those server's without having to go through
>authentication.
>It's a hack, but it works.
err. adobe PDF
damn. sorry. aarrghhh. It's a friday here and i'm looking forward tothe
w/end.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Aube [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [squid-users] ntlm won't prompt
At Friday, 11 July 2003, [EMAIL PROTECT
I don't want the password prompt, but i do want people with linux boxes that
NTLM won't work to still use basic. this also works if in the conf you have
ntlm first and then basic. very very nice.
just the adobe thing is the pain. that's why i was hoping for an acl that
says this is adobe, use
a bug to Adobe? ok. sounds like a plan.
does anybody know how to use tcpdump to sniff what the browser is sending as
it's header?
thanks for that acl. problem is i've got say 6 or 8 people using Adobe PDF
capture. they're all on DHCP. i've got a similar acl for our servers which
obviously are
Hi All,
I've got a beautifully working squid server with NTLM then BASIC auth so
windows automatically authenticates and Linux can use basic auth.
basically it's compiled with ntlm,basic support.
2 questions:
1. We have a number of users that use Adobe Web Capture to PDF file. with
basic a
21 matches
Mail list logo
