* Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1215083751.310 0 10.47.52.76 TCP_MISS/417 1811 CONNECT
drm.viasyshc.com:443 - NONE/- text/html
417 is Expectation Failed, and means the application sent an Expect:
header which can not be fulfilled by Squid.
Most likely this is Expect:
On fre, 2008-07-04 at 09:50 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I added this. Let's see how it goes.
2.6.x behaved differently in this regard?
Yes. 2.6 is quite ignorant about HTTP/1.1 requirements like Expect.
Regards
Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Ralf,
On Fri, Jul 04, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
ignore_expect_100 on
I added this. Let's see how it goes.
2.6.x behaved differently in this regard?
yes and 3.0 behaves differnt, too.
I had the same problem with 2.7 so I switched to 3.0
--
GruĂ
Dieter
--
I do not get viruses
* Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ignore_expect_100 on
Before:
1215157781.184 0 10.47.52.76 TCP_MISS/417 1811 CONNECT
drm.viasyshc.com:443 - NONE/- text/html
1215157782.410 0 10.47.52.75 TCP_MISS/417 1811 CONNECT
drm.viasyshc.com:443 - NONE/- text/html
After:
121516.207
On fre, 2008-07-04 at 10:38 +0200, Dieter Bloms wrote:
Hi Ralf,
On Fri, Jul 04, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
ignore_expect_100 on
I added this. Let's see how it goes.
2.6.x behaved differently in this regard?
yes and 3.0 behaves differnt, too.
3.0 is as ignorant about HTTP/1.1
* Dieter Bloms [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I added this. Let's see how it goes.
2.6.x behaved differently in this regard?
yes and 3.0 behaves differnt, too.
I had the same problem with 2.7 so I switched to 3.0
I used 3.0.x but was bitten by the empty pages problem...
I wonder why this ignore 100 expect behaviour isn't default.. Henrik,
why isn't it default in 2.7 there are issues with the expect handling?
Adrian
2008/7/4 Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Dieter Bloms [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I added this. Let's see how it goes.
2.6.x behaved
* Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I wonder why this ignore 100 expect behaviour isn't default.. Henrik,
why isn't it default in 2.7 there are issues with the expect handling?
Good question!
I would have expected 2.7.x to behave like 2.6.x (well, at least since
my switch to 3.0.x didn't break
On fre, 2008-07-04 at 19:38 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I wonder why this ignore 100 expect behaviour isn't default.. Henrik,
why isn't it default in 2.7 there are issues with the expect handling?
Processing Expect is a MUST level requirement.
The reason this in case of 100-continue this is
A tool supposedly worked until May and now, due to the evil squid update
to 2.7.x, won't work anymore. Of course squid is to blame, as always.
Since we all know, the professional tool is written with great care,
adhering to the specs and RFC by knowledgeable people. Unlike squid. Of
course. Call
Attaching the actual request thats being made would probably be a good
place to start :)
Adrian
2008/7/3 Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A tool supposedly worked until May and now, due to the evil squid update
to 2.7.x, won't work anymore. Of course squid is to blame, as always.
Since
* Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Attaching the actual request thats being made would probably be a good
place to start :)
Yes, how do I log this?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
On tor, 2008-07-03 at 16:43 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
A tool supposedly worked until May and now, due to the evil squid update
to 2.7.x, won't work anymore. Of course squid is to blame, as always.
Since we all know, the professional tool is written with great care,
adhering to the specs
On tor, 2008-07-03 at 20:16 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Attaching the actual request thats being made would probably be a good
place to start :)
Yes, how do I log this?
log_mime_hdrs on
Regards
Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
14 matches
Mail list logo
