Hi Adrian,
Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
I'd first give ZFS a shot - either through opensolaris or FreeBSD.
It has slightly saner memory caching logic (which eats RAM for breakfast
mind you) that may suit this workload a little better.
Since you mentioned ZFS, I have been thinking for some time
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
Do you think that this ZFS file system scales better than current file
systems if used for caching such as Squid?
Do you have any statistics?
I've got no statistics and I've not seen any reports from anyone who
has tried comparing ZFS to
On 19.01.08 18:26, Michelle Konzack wrote:
I have killed a hardisk (160 GByte) again because to heavy traffic of
gnump3d. The problem is, that the natural caching of linux does
not work, even if I have only arround 700 MByte of songs I hear all the
time and the installed memory is 2 GByte.
Hello,
I have killed a hardisk (160 GByte) again because to heavy traffic of
gnump3d. The problem is, that the natural caching of linux does
not work, even if I have only arround 700 MByte of songs I hear all the
time and the installed memory is 2 GByte. The access of gnump3d on the
harddisk is
Hi,
I'd first give ZFS a shot - either through opensolaris or FreeBSD.
It has slightly saner memory caching logic (which eats RAM for breakfast
mind you) that may suit this workload a little better.
Thats probably a smarter move than trying to squeeze a HTTP proxy
inline just yet. :)
adrian