On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:49:57PM -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Depends on your chosen ACL type and the number of patterns.
Many regex may be slower than DG, many dstdomain or dst may improve
response time.
It looks like the lists are far too large for any regex type acls but
the acl
2009/1/7 Henrik K h...@hege.li:
When using dstdomain with a lot of entries (million), a squid reload might
take tens of seconds. During this time it will refuse clients, which is not
nice.
That sounds not good.
How about squid's rotating logs, will it also refuse clients at that time?
Ralf.
What kind of performance issues should I expect if I remove squidGuard and
simply make a series of acl's pointing to shalla bl files directly then denying
them with http_access deny statements?
Given the size of the shalla lists, what would any seasoned squid admins expect
as a scalability
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
What kind of performance issues should I expect if I remove squidGuard and
simply make a series of acl's pointing to shalla bl files directly then denying
them with http_access deny statements?
Depends on your chosen ACL type and the number of patterns.
Many regex may
Depends on your chosen ACL type and the number of patterns.
Many regex may be slower than DG, many dstdomain or dst may improve
response time.
It looks like the lists are far too large for any regex type acls but
the acl name dstdomain file is causing me issues with the way the
shalla lists are
