Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On mån, 2007-07-30 at 23:55 +0545, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
I have applied your techniques you describe above. I still have problems
detecting my child proxies. In a layman view, how to I see them in the
first place.
If you are lucky the child proxies add
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
How do I detect and stop them from operating child proxies.
I would really appreciate your help on this matter.
This issue has been bugging me for some time now!
I think you need to begin by describing the why ..
Adrian
On tis, 2007-07-31 at 13:59 +0545, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
Pardon me on this but how do I actually use the req_header ACL type? I
am little confused with it's syntax.
Example acl matching if either X-Forwarded-For or Via is used:
acl proxy_headers req_header X-Forwarded-For .
acl
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
How do I detect and stop them from operating child proxies.
I would really appreciate your help on this matter.
This issue has been bugging me for some time now!
I think you need to begin by describing the why ..
Hi
On tis, 2007-07-31 at 17:30 +0545, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
Now I have found out that some of our clients are using some sort of
proxy server to share and utilize that bandwidth which is burstable.
And it's probably not Squid, and most likely does not add the discussed
headers. More likely
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On tis, 2007-07-31 at 13:59 +0545, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
Pardon me on this but how do I actually use the req_header ACL type? I
am little confused with it's syntax.
Example acl matching if either X-Forwarded-For or Via is used:
acl proxy_headers req_header
--- Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And it's probably not Squid, and most likely does
not add the discussed
headers. More likely just standard Windows
connection sharing.
I think that the windows ICS adds the headers because
my ISP was able to block connection from client
Hi Henrik,
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On tis, 2007-07-31 at 17:30 +0545, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
Now I have found out that some of our clients are using some sort of
proxy server to share and utilize that bandwidth which is burstable.
And it's probably not Squid, and most likely does not add
squid inbox wrote:
--- Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And it's probably not Squid, and most likely does
not add the discussed
headers. More likely just standard Windows
connection sharing.
I think that the windows ICS adds the headers because
my ISP was able to block connection
--- Tek Bahadur Limbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. So did you completely defeat your ISP after
using your stealth
proxy server?
Easily defeated the XFF and Via headers issue with my
proxy server. So my client computers were able to
connect with no blocking.
However, the other
On tis, 2007-07-31 at 12:34 -0700, squid inbox wrote:
One of the techniques that my ISP uses is that when a
program is downloading with full throttle, and when i
open a page, his server will not split the speed for
the requests, instead it either ignores it or replies
after a large amount of
-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Detecting and blocking child proxy servers
On tis, 2007-07-31 at 12:34 -0700, squid inbox wrote:
One of the techniques that my ISP uses is that when a program is
downloading with full throttle, and when i open a page, his server
will not split the speed
More likely it's just a very large link transmit
buffer at the ISP
causing latency to skyrocket.. seen on most DSL
links. It's a common
technique used for maximising download speeds, but
serverely hurts
interactivity while a download is in progress.
I have a cable internet, and the speed
On tis, 2007-07-31 at 15:27 -0500, Scott B. Anderson wrote:
I would have thought so too, but my sample website, news.com.com loads
just fine (and really fast) with proxy off using the same machine as
the default route, so I thought the problem must lie within squid.
Odd. I assume you NAT the
Juraj Sakala wrote:
Thanks once again for sharing light on this. Do you have any examples
where I can use req_header to detect if my clients have their own proxy
servers?
Any clue, web links or posts will highly be appreciated.
Also is req_header the only option whereby we can detect child
On mån, 2007-07-30 at 23:55 +0545, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
I have applied your techniques you describe above. I still have problems
detecting my child proxies. In a layman view, how to I see them in the
first place.
If you are lucky the child proxies add X-Forwarded-For or Via headers,
Juraj Sakala wrote:
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 14:42, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
Juraj Sakala wrote:
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 12:56, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
Is this possible? In other words, I want my proxy servers to detect
squid or other proxy severs which are being used or operated by others
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 14:42, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
Juraj Sakala wrote:
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 12:56, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
Is this possible? In other words, I want my proxy servers to detect
squid or other proxy severs which are being used or operated by others
besides me.
Thanks once again for sharing light on this. Do you have any examples
where I can use req_header to detect if my clients have their own proxy
servers?
Any clue, web links or posts will highly be appreciated.
Also is req_header the only option whereby we can detect child proxies?
Or do we
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 12:56, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
Is this possible? In other words, I want my proxy servers to detect
squid or other proxy severs which are being used or operated by others
besides me.
May it is bepossible:
- if you know your network you can use header x_forwarded_for to
Juraj Sakala wrote:
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 12:56, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
Is this possible? In other words, I want my proxy servers to detect
squid or other proxy severs which are being used or operated by others
besides me.
May it is bepossible:
- if you know your network you can use
Hi all,
We have Squid-2.6 proxy servers running in transparent mode. I want to
know if we can disable sibling/child proxy servers from using our proxy
servers via the X-Forward-For headers.
For example, I only want to allow only my selected child/sibling proxy
servers from being able to use
22 matches
Mail list logo
