Re: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Amos Jeffries
Marcel Grandemange wrote: Good day. Im wondering if anybody could shed some light for me. Ive had to downgrade a machine of mine due to bugs in stable10, however since the downgrade im noticing a HELL of a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200 Messages in access.log. And I do mean an extreme amount.

Re: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On tis, 2008-11-18 at 09:47 +0200, Marcel Grandemange wrote: Good day. Im wondering if anybody could shed some light for me. Ive had to downgrade a machine of mine due to bugs in stable10, however since the downgrade im noticing a HELL of a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200 Messages in

Re: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On tis, 2008-11-18 at 21:14 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: Do you have the same 64/32 bit settings and --with-large-files on both builds? Didn't we make the cache and swap.state format large-files independent in Squid-3? Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

RE: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Marcel Grandemange
Good day. Im wondering if anybody could shed some light for me. Ive had to downgrade a machine of mine due to bugs in stable10, however since the downgrade im noticing a HELL of a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200 Messages in access.log. And I do mean an extreme amount. Any ideas? Sounds

RE: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Marcel Grandemange
Good day. Im wondering if anybody could shed some light for me. Ive had to downgrade a machine of mine due to bugs in stable10, however since the downgrade im noticing a HELL of a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200 Messages in access.log. And I do mean an extreme amount. Any ideas? Do you

RE: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On tis, 2008-11-18 at 12:01 +0200, Marcel Grandemange wrote: How and why would this happen? The box hasn't been powered off in months. Also first time something like this has happened. So far im guesing it was upgrade to stable 10 that mucked things up. Personally ive never had so many issues

Re: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Amos Jeffries
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: On tis, 2008-11-18 at 21:14 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: Do you have the same 64/32 bit settings and --with-large-files on both builds? Didn't we make the cache and swap.state format large-files independent in Squid-3? Not 3.0 that I know of. Certainly not different

RE: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Marcel Grandemange
How and why would this happen? The box hasn't been powered off in months. Also first time something like this has happened. So far im guesing it was upgrade to stable 10 that mucked things up. Personally ive never had so many issues with any particular version of squid. As Amos already

RE: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-18 Thread Dean Weimer
Grandemange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 6:57 AM To: 'Henrik Nordstrom' Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: RE: [squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9 How and why would this happen? The box hasn't been powered off in months. Also first time something like

[squid-users] Downgrade from 3.0stable10 to 3.0stable9

2008-11-17 Thread Marcel Grandemange
Good day. Im wondering if anybody could shed some light for me. Ive had to downgrade a machine of mine due to bugs in stable10, however since the downgrade im noticing a HELL of a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200 Messages in access.log. And I do mean an extreme amount. Any ideas?