Amos Jeffries wrote:
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Christos Tsantilas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But since, i had heard that Squid 2.6 version had better performance
than Squid 3.0, i would like to try that also as a backup.
Squid 3 is enough fast for most cases. You will not see any
difference in
* Marcus Kool [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I can confirm that. We switched from 2.6 - 3.0 with no hassle (at 100
requests/s)
I had Adrian benchmark 3.x recently. With his specific RAM-pathways test.
The cutoff for speed seems to be Squid3 reaching 500-650 req/sec and
Squid 2.6 going past that
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 13:18 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I had Adrian benchmark 3.x recently. With his specific RAM-pathways test.
The cutoff for speed seems to be Squid3 reaching 500-650 req/sec and
Squid 2.6 going past that into the 800-900
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 14:34 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Christos Tsantilas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But since, i had heard that Squid 2.6 version had better performance
than Squid 3.0, i would like to try that also as a backup.
Squid 3 is enough fast for most cases.
* Christos Tsantilas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But since, i had heard that Squid 2.6 version had better performance
than Squid 3.0, i would like to try that also as a backup.
Squid 3 is enough fast for most cases. You will not see any difference in
performance unless you have a very-very busy
Hi Selvi,
Yes, I had already tried that.
But since, i had heard that Squid 2.6 version had better performance
than Squid 3.0, i would like to try that also as a backup.
Squid 3 is enough fast for most cases. You will not see any difference in
performance unless you have a very-very busy
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Christos Tsantilas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But since, i had heard that Squid 2.6 version had better performance
than Squid 3.0, i would like to try that also as a backup.
Squid 3 is enough fast for most cases. You will not see any difference in
performance unless you have
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I had Adrian benchmark 3.x recently. With his specific RAM-pathways test.
The cutoff for speed seems to be Squid3 reaching 500-650 req/sec and
Squid 2.6 going past that into the 800-900 req/sec ranges. At a few
hundred concurrent requests.
Yes, I had already tried that.
But since, i had heard that Squid 2.6 version had better performance
than Squid 3.0, i would like to try that also as a backup.
Thanks
Selvi
Amos Jeffries wrote:
selvi wrote:
Hello All,
I am in the process of patching Squid 2.6 icap with
Hello All,
I am in the process of patching Squid 2.6 icap with Squid-2.6.STABLE10
version.
Squid 2.6 icap patch is taken from
http://devel.squid-cache.org/cgi-bin/diff2/icap-2_6.patch
I had one rejection in client_side.c and i had done that change manually.
But when i issue the command
selvi wrote:
Hello All,
I am in the process of patching Squid 2.6 icap with Squid-2.6.STABLE10
version.
Have you tried Squid 3.0 stable 1 ? It incorporates ICAP natively
amongst other improvements.
Amos
--
Please use Squid 2.6STABLE17+ or 3.0STABLE1+
There are serious security advisories
11 matches
Mail list logo
