On 01.02.11 19:00, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> If you have a choice HTCP.
> The packets are slightly bigger than ICP (they contain HTTP headers not
> just URLs) but the false-positives are much lower and thus routing
> choices are better.
[...]
>>> CD has more false positives than I
On 11/02/11 03:28, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 01/02/11 17:06, Pandu Poluan wrote:
I have 2 questions regarding SQUID peering:
Q1: Should I use ICP or HTCP?
On 01.02.11 19:00, Amos Jeffries wrote:
If you have a choice HTCP.
The packets are slightly bigger than ICP (they contain HTTP he
>>> On 01/02/11 17:06, Pandu Poluan wrote:
I have 2 questions regarding SQUID peering:
Q1: Should I use ICP or HTCP?
>> On 01.02.11 19:00, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>> If you have a choice HTCP.
>>> The packets are slightly bigger than ICP (they contain HTTP headers not
>>> just URLs) b
On 09/02/11 22:52, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 01/02/11 17:06, Pandu Poluan wrote:
I have 2 questions regarding SQUID peering:
Q1: Should I use ICP or HTCP?
On 01.02.11 19:00, Amos Jeffries wrote:
If you have a choice HTCP.
The packets are slightly bigger than ICP (they contain HTTP hea
> On 01/02/11 17:06, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>> I have 2 questions regarding SQUID peering:
>>
>> Q1: Should I use ICP or HTCP?
On 01.02.11 19:00, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> If you have a choice HTCP.
> The packets are slightly bigger than ICP (they contain HTTP headers not
> just URLs) but the false-po
On 01/02/11 17:06, Pandu Poluan wrote:
Hello again!
I have 2 questions regarding SQUID peering:
Q1: Should I use ICP or HTCP?
If you have a choice HTCP.
The packets are slightly bigger than ICP (they contain HTTP headers not
just URLs) but the false-positives are much lower and thus routing
Hello again!
I have 2 questions regarding SQUID peering:
Q1: Should I use ICP or HTCP?
Q2: I plan on deploying 2 SQUID boxes in my LAN, say "A" and "B". They
will peer with each other (sibling). I also have another SQUID at our
ISP, say "C". I want only "A" to have "C" as the parent, "B" will ha
