Amos Jeffries-2 wrote
On 25/02/2013 12:30 a.m., Ahmad wrote:
hello ,
thanks Amos , ive modified the config file as u suggested .
after removing the raid 0 , ive noted a better performance .
=
in general , browsing speed is lower
On 25/02/2013 9:18 p.m., Ahmad wrote:
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote
On 25/02/2013 12:30 a.m., Ahmad wrote:
hello ,
thanks Amos , ive modified the config file as u suggested .
after removing the raid 0 , ive noted a better performance .
=
in
hi ,
i have server delr720 .
i have centos 6.3 x68_64 bit , with kernel 3.7.5 compiled with tproxy
support
i have ram 32 Giga .
i have 4 hardsiks as follow:
hardisk#1==opertaing system 170 giga ssd hardsik with name sda
hardsik#2 , hardsik#3 , hardsik#4 , ===had been as raid 0 with name sdb
Ahmad,
Also look at http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/SquidMemory
Hint: a 1500 GB disk cache requires a very large in-memory index.
Also reserve memory for squidguard and the OS.
Marcus
On 02/25/2013 05:18 AM, Ahmad wrote:
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote
On 25/02/2013 12:30 a.m., Ahmad wrote:
hi
Marcus Kool wrote
Ahmad,
Also look at http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/SquidMemory
Hint: a 1500 GB disk cache requires a very large in-memory index.
Also reserve memory for squidguard and the OS.
Marcus
On 02/25/2013 05:18 AM, Ahmad wrote:
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote
On
On 02/25/2013 01:51 PM, Ahmad wrote:
hi
Marcus ,
u must be correct ,
i have 32 G total memory ,
ive confiured in cache_mem =2 M which is 20 G !!
ive noticed that squid hanged and got down after some hours of operating !!
i looked at all logs of squid and squidguard ,
i didnt find any
On 26/02/2013 6:34 a.m., Marcus Kool wrote:
On 02/25/2013 01:51 PM, Ahmad wrote:
hi
Marcus ,
u must be correct ,
i have 32 G total memory ,
ive confiured in cache_mem =2 M which is 20 G !!
ive noticed that squid hanged and got down after some hours of
operating !!
i looked at all
hello ,
thanks Amos , ive modified the config file as u suggested .
after removing the raid 0 , ive noted a better performance .
=
in general , browsing speed is lower than the speed in the absence of squid
, but any way it is
note that that there is alot of free memory , and the cpu of the server didnt
reach 100 %
==
[root@squid ~]# free -m
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 32192 16289 15903
Hallo, Ahmad,
Du meintest am 24.02.13:
here is the log of squidguard !
squidGuard is another problem than squid.
==
2013-02-24 06:25:32 [17282] Warning: Possible bypass attempt. Found
multiple slashes where only one is expected:
hello helmut ,
i know that !
sorry , im not understanding you .
regards
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/slow-browsing-in-centos-6-3-with-squid-3-tp4658635p4658678.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Ahmad,
If you think the problem is squidguard, you have to get sure about this.
I suggest to disable squidguard and see if the performance get better
to confirm that the bottleneck is indeed caused by squidguard.
IF it is confirmed that squidguard is the bottleneck you can either
try to
On 25/02/2013 12:30 a.m., Ahmad wrote:
hello ,
thanks Amos , ive modified the config file as u suggested .
after removing the raid 0 , ive noted a better performance .
=
in general , browsing speed is lower than the speed in the
Regarding ext4 for your cache-disks:
You might consider adding the following options to the mount
journal_async_commit,noauto_da_alloc,nobh
Will release some more safety of the stored data; however, because of
nobarriers some risk there, anyway.
However, when using 3 cache_dirs instead of RAID-0
hi ,
thanks alot dear for info ,
now i removed the raid 0
now i have 3 hardisks
/cache1
/cach2
/cache3
do u think mounting them in fstab file as :
/dev/sdb1 /cache1 ext4 noatime,barrier=0,data=writeback,commit=100 0 2
/dev/sdc1 /cache2 ext4 noatime,barrier=0,data=writeback,commit=100 0 2
hi ,
thanks alot Mr Amos ,
im really appreciating your help ,
as you mentioned , i tried to install squid 3.3.0 last copy ,
ive compiled it as :
configure options: '--enable-linux-netfliter' '--enable-wccpv2'
--enable-ltdl-convenience
===
but i have problem in
On 23/02/2013 11:47 p.m., Ahmad wrote:
hi ,
thanks alot Mr Amos ,
im really appreciating your help ,
as you mentioned , i tried to install squid 3.3.0 last copy ,
ive compiled it as :
configure options: '--enable-linux-netfliter' '--enable-wccpv2'
--enable-ltdl-convenience
Hi mr Amos ,
ive installed libcap2 already in centos 6.3
[root@squid ~]# yum install libcap
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: ftp.hosteurope.de
* extras: ftp.hosteurope.de
* updates: ftp.hosteurope.de
base
On 24/02/2013 2:26 a.m., Ahmad wrote:
Hi mr Amos ,
ive installed libcap2 already in centos 6.3
[root@squid ~]# yum install libcap
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: ftp.hosteurope.de
* extras: ftp.hosteurope.de
* updates:
hi ,
i want to say that the problem exist in the presence and absense of
squidguard .
i note that the storing on the hardsik is slow relative to the users pumped
to squid !!
did u have a look on squid.conf file ?
i think it need some modification enhacements .
with my best regards
--
my squidguard version
[root@squid ~]# squidGuard -v
SquidGuard: 1.4 Berkeley DB 4.7.25: (April 4, 2012)
with it help
regards
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/slow-browsing-in-centos-6-3-with-squid-3-tp4658635p4658638.html
Sent from the
On 22/02/2013 9:57 p.m., Ahmad wrote:
hi ,
i want to say that the problem exist in the presence and absense of
squidguard .
i note that the storing on the hardsik is slow relative to the users pumped
to squid !!
Yes. You are using RAID.
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/RAID
RAID-0
22 matches
Mail list logo
