Problem: internet navigation is extremely slow.
I've used squid from 1999 with no problems at all; during last month,
one proxy gave me a lot of troubles.
First we upgraded the system, from RHEL5.x - squid 2.6.x to RHEL6.x
squid3.4.x with no improvements.
Second, we have bypassed the Trend Micro
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Michele Mase' michele.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Problem: internet navigation is extremely slow.
I've used squid from 1999 with no problems at all; during last month,
one proxy gave me a lot of troubles.
First we upgraded the system, from RHEL5.x - squid 2.6.x to
Hi,
Just want to put my two pennies in. 'Slow' internet navigation through
squid is often observed in case of incorrect DNS server settings on
squid box. Often issues are:
- ipv6 DNS queries are performed first;
- first DNS server in /etc/resolv.conf is not responsible.
Both of these cases
The analysis was made using firebug from different browsers, using
different proxyes/
direct access; with the problematic proxy, what I can see is an high
waiting time, indicating that the header's page response is high.
Therefore in cache.log i see many
local=xx: remote=yy:zz FD
Hm...
Connection timed out is an OS/TCPIP issue. Can you try using
accessing the same resource from the server itself (e.g. with wget,
GET or running firefox on the proxy server).
It seems that there's something on the network level: faulty ethernet,
switch, router, firewall or network line, or
Thanks Eliezer Croitoru this has been a helpful stuff .
ill let you know if found any difficulty in deplying procedure.
Thanks
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ngtech.co.il wrote:
On 29/04/2012 08:49, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
IT seems that things are doing good
On 29/04/2012 08:49, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
IT seems that things are doing good with out huge domain list. so now
my next goal is squidguard.
but the problem with squid guard was that i tried it configuring and
i saw many online manuals but it didnt activated so i just started
using
IT seems that things are doing good with out huge domain list. so now
my next goal is squidguard.
but the problem with squid guard was that i tried it configuring and
i saw many online manuals but it didnt activated so i just started
using domain list. however if thing doesnt work ill update the
i think the delay was due to the 10mb of domain list. it seems that
things are back to track now. however for further restriction ill look
into other solutions as suggested in this thread.
Thanks alot
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks , i learn
Thanks , i learn some thing new from you all. however ill update the
results in few days as i am monitoring the stuff as how things are
going.
Thanks,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On 25/04/2012 3:34 a.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 24/04/2012
ok i just disabled all the rules and it works for me now ill test
which rule is making a problem and let you know also.
Thanks
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com wrote:
here is the log for bbc.co.uk . first and last msg of log
so you can see the time
are you taking about the delay pools rules?
also if it's a proxy that is open to the internet i would limit the
access to port 3128 to only lan.
your http_access rules are allowing anyone to use the proxy for the
whitelist.
Regards,
Eliezer
On 24/04/2012 09:06, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
ok i trim down config file to this as you suggested of blocking
whitelist to local net.. let see how things work tommorw. ill update.
but block list is like 10MB big do you think it could be the
problem.as every query has to be matched with 10 MB database.
?
#-Allow All
On 24/04/2012 18:14, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
ok i trim down config file to this as you suggested of blocking
whitelist to local net.. let see how things work tommorw. ill update.
but block list is like 10MB big do you think it could be the
problem.as every query has to be matched with 10 MB
A 10 MB flat file of domains contains roughly 50 domains.
You also use time-based ACLs and ACLs based on IP address range.
This config can be implemented using ufdbGuard,
a free URL rewriter for Squid.
ufdbGuard is better maintained than squidGuard and has more
features.
Marcus
On
ok Thanks ill lookinto that as well
Thanks for letting me know
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Marcus Kool
marcus.k...@urlfilterdb.com wrote:
A 10 MB flat file of domains contains roughly 50 domains.
You also use time-based ACLs and ACLs based on IP address range.
This config can be
On 25/04/2012 3:34 a.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 24/04/2012 18:14, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
ok i trim down config file to this as you suggested of blocking
whitelist to local net.. let see how things work tommorw. ill update.
but block list is like 10MB big do you think it could be the
well i have been experiencing slow Internet browsing. not very slow
but comparatively slower then IPCOP firewall. i can not understand how
come i diagnose the issue.
i mean. i increase the RAM , i checked the DNS every thing is fine but
my browser stuck at connecting ones it start download it do
On 23/04/2012 18:38, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
well i have been experiencing slow Internet browsing. not very slow
but comparatively slower then IPCOP firewall. i can not understand how
come i diagnose the issue.
i mean. i increase the RAM , i checked the DNS every thing is fine but
my browser
Here you go with my squid.conf
acl all src all
acl manager proto cache_object
acl localhost src 127.0.0.1/32
acl to_localhost dst 127.0.0.0/8
acl localnet src 10.0.0.0/8 # RFC1918 possible internal network
acl localnet src 172.16.0.0/12 # RFC1918 possible internal network
acl localnet src
here is the log for bbc.co.uk . first and last msg of log
so you can see the time delay.
335205033.183841 10.51.100.240 TCP_MISS/200 24506 GET
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ - DIRECT/212.58.244.66 text/html
1335205057.936328 10.51.100.240 TCP_REFRESH_HIT/304 435 GET
On 7/20/2011 9:12 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:12:04 -0400, Wilson Hernandez wrote:
Hello.
I am puzzled to see how my bandwidth is used when running squid. I have
a total of 25M/3M of bandwidth, lately I've noticed with iptraf that my
external interface traffic/bandwidth is
On 22/07/11 16:00, Wilson Hernandez wrote:
On 7/20/2011 9:12 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:12:04 -0400, Wilson Hernandez wrote:
Hello.
I am puzzled to see how my bandwidth is used when running squid. I have
a total of 25M/3M of bandwidth, lately I've noticed with iptraf that
Hello.
I am puzzled to see how my bandwidth is used when running squid. I have
a total of 25M/3M of bandwidth, lately I've noticed with iptraf that my
external interface traffic/bandwidth is almost maxed out at 24.8M and my
internal interface (squid) is only at 2.9M as a result most clients have
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:12:04 -0400, Wilson Hernandez wrote:
Hello.
I am puzzled to see how my bandwidth is used when running squid. I
have
a total of 25M/3M of bandwidth, lately I've noticed with iptraf that
my
external interface traffic/bandwidth is almost maxed out at 24.8M and
my
internal
I use CentOS 4.4 and 5.1. But I recomend to you CentOS
4.4 because is a bit more easy for configure due to
the squid and samba versions included in this distro.
Be careful if you are using some intel motherboard and
how Linux see the hard disk. If there are SATA you
should see that as sdx(x=a b or
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:04:35 -0400
Jeremy Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using the squid proxy is really slow. Is there anyway to make it faster?
I have squid version Squid2.6STABLE18 on a XP.
Please use a server OS, either 2003 Server if you really have to run on
Windows, or something like
Hello,
Using the squid proxy is really slow. Is there anyway to make it faster?
I have squid version Squid2.6STABLE18 on a XP.
The machine I am running this on is a Dell PowerEdge SC 1420 Xeon CPU
2.80GHz and 4GB if ram. I am using three scsi drives. One to host the
squid and operating
I really never used squid on Windows plataform, but i
think it culd be run as good as in linux enviromet.
What user validation method are you implemented? a
missconfig squid.conf could be a cause. Check your
cache.log for validation erros.
--- Jeremy Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I actually started with squid on a suse 10.2 but it had problems of its
own. It would be working fine but once in a while it would have these
long delays. I think it was when cache was being swapped.
Which linux version do you use for your linux?
Also I am not running any user authentication
Hi, I am getting fairly slow times (this is more an observation than looking at
the logs) when loading web pages. I am the only person on an ADSL2+
connection, with squid setup and caching (see squid.conf below). Does anyone
have any ideas on how i could make it more responsive? Any other
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007, Adam Parsons wrote:
Hi, I am getting fairly slow times (this is more an observation than looking
at the logs) when loading web pages. I am the only person on an ADSL2+
connection, with squid setup and caching (see squid.conf below). Does anyone
have any ideas on how
Thanks Adrian, changing it to 64 256 has done the trick, now its almost instant.
Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, February 1, 2007 4:25 pm
To: Adam Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Slow
Out of curiosity, if i leave out the cache_dir line, what settings would squid
use?
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, February 1, 2007 4:25 pm
To: Adam Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Slow Internet
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007, Adam Parsons wrote:
Out of curiosity, if i leave out the cache_dir line, what settings would
squid use?
cache_dir ufs /path/to/default/cache 100 16 256 or something similar like that.
(I wish it were actually 'null', but thats just me.)
Adrian
wanna share info with you guys..Anyway, thanks for all the help and
suggestion..
- Original Message
From: nonama [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: SQUID group squid-users@squid-cache.org
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 12:47:08 PM
Subject: [squid-users] Slow internet access performance
HI,
Just
Hi Henrik,
Do you mean that I have to let IWSS do caching too,
when I already have squid to cache?
Also, what do you mean by enabled download progress
window? Which setting is that? Anybody knows where to
tweak that in IWSS? Kindly help.
Thank you.
--- Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mån 2006-10-02 klockan 01:34 -0700 skrev nonama:
Hi Henrik,
Do you mean that I have to let IWSS do caching too,
when I already have squid to cache?
What I mean is that don't enable the progress window function of IWSS if
you expect Squid to be able to cache the responses..
If you absolutely
tor 2006-09-21 klockan 21:47 -0700 skrev nonama:
abt 500 users into SQUID. Just want to find out
whether the above setting of cache_peer, will force
all connection from SQUID to the http antivirus, no
matter whether the data requested has been cached at
SQUID or not.
A parent is used by
HI,
Just want to find out , whether anyone out there has
SQUID proxy and Trend Micro's Interscan WEb security
Suite (http antivirus gateway) configured in your
internet infrastructure.
To enable any traffic that requires to go out to the
net, I have put this setting at the squid.conf.
Hi All,
We have installed Squid Proxy in our Org. Two Proxy Server are installed at
Cache_peers and we have selected round-robin. Few days back when we enabled proxy
access to few users it was working fine, but now we have enabled for all users now it
has become very slow.
Do let me know if
Hi,
How much RAM is in the machine? How fast is the disk (rotational speed
and data rate)?
The machine hardware configuration is:
RAM: 128 MB
Hard disk: 20 GB
P3 1.2 processor
How do I find out the rotational speed data rate?
Looking at your past emails, I see that you are using
42 matches
Mail list logo
