Hey Thanx Henrik,
And Amos,
Yes Definitely I can test them for sure.
I here to do any help I can offer
Regards
Babs
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
Babu Chaliyath wrote:
Converting IPv4 address fields to IPv6+IPv4 shared trees...
The client info
Converting IPv4 address fields to IPv6+IPv4 shared trees...
The client info table had cacheClientAddressType added as .1,
cacheClientAddress shuffled to .2
... which bumped all cacheClient* from .N to .N+1
The peering table had cachePeerIndex added as .1 and cacheClientAddressType
added
tis 2009-11-03 klockan 17:25 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:
MIB numbering should never change. Old numbers may cease to exists when
their data sources go away and new number appear as new info gets
published, but existing numbering should not change...
Converting IPv4 address fields to
Babu Chaliyath wrote:
Converting IPv4 address fields to IPv6+IPv4 shared trees...
The client info table had cacheClientAddressType added as .1,
cacheClientAddress shuffled to .2
... which bumped all cacheClient* from .N to .N+1
The peering table had cachePeerIndex added as .1 and
Hi List,
Struggling to get mrtg working with squid. No values shown in the mrtg graph.
My System as follows
OS Freebsd 7.2
Squid 3.1.0.14
Snmpwalk 5.4.2.1
mrtg 2.16.2
Squid snmp acls are working fine as I am getting results with following command
#snmpwalk -m /usr/local/etc/squid/mib.txt -v2c
Babu Chaliyath wrote:
Hi List,
Struggling to get mrtg working with squid. No values shown in the mrtg graph.
My System as follows
OS Freebsd 7.2
Squid 3.1.0.14
Snmpwalk 5.4.2.1
mrtg 2.16.2
Squid snmp acls are working fine as I am getting results with following command
#snmpwalk -m
mån 2009-11-02 klockan 23:47 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:
Make sure that the mib.txt you/mrtg are using came from the 3.1 source
code. There have been major changes to the MIB numbering in 3.1.
Hmm.. what kind of changes?
MIB numbering should never change. Old numbers may cease to exists when
Make sure that the mib.txt you/mrtg are using came from the 3.1 source code.
There have been major changes to the MIB numbering in 3.1.
Amos
--
Please be using
Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE7 or 3.0.STABLE20
Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.14
Hi, thanx for the reply
Yes I am using the
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
mån 2009-11-02 klockan 23:47 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:
Make sure that the mib.txt you/mrtg are using came from the 3.1 source
code. There have been major changes to the MIB numbering in 3.1.
Hmm.. what kind of changes?
MIB numbering should never change. Old numbers
