On 10/15/07, Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably you have a TCP connection based load balancer instead of one
that balances on actual traffic, and the Netcaches have persistent
connections disabled..
See the client_persistent_connections and persistent_request_timeout
On tis, 2007-10-16 at 09:42 -0700, Tory M Blue wrote:
Client persistence in a reverse proxy environment makes no sens
I disagree. The TCP setup cost is a very large portion of the total page
load time, especially if you have users far away..
but it do place a different workload on the load
On fre, 2007-10-12 at 10:52 -0700, Tory M Blue wrote:
Trying to figure out how I can reduce connections, sitting around on
my Squid boxes.
I'm still running with both Netcaches and a few Squid boxes and what
I'm seeing in my loadbalancer is that the Netcaches have 50% less
connections at
Trying to figure out how I can reduce connections, sitting around on
my Squid boxes.
I'm still running with both Netcaches and a few Squid boxes and what
I'm seeing in my loadbalancer is that the Netcaches have 50% less
connections at any given time than the Squid boxes. Also the Netcache
You of course need to start looking at this by analysing what is actually
going on with the boxes and the network layer. There's not much that can be
suggested given the current information.
That said, NetCache's -are- much more efficient for most workloads than
Squid. Its just what happens when
