Re: [squid-users] Transparent Vs Non-transparent proxy

2009-12-09 Thread Amos Jeffries
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:55:48 +0500, "Asim Ahmed @ Folio3" wrote: > Hi, > FWIW, what you are talking about is NAT interception, not true transparency. I'm trying to get people to clean up the talk since Squid-3 is now moving towards true 'tproxy' transparency plus NAT interception plus invisible

Re: [squid-users] Transparent Vs Non-transparent proxy

2009-12-09 Thread Chris Robertson
Asim Ahmed @ Folio3 wrote: Hi, I need an expert opinion on best suitable setup for my requirement. I am running shorewall 4.4 on RHEL 5 for NATTING/FIREWALLING. I've installed SQUID-3.0STABLE20-1 on that same machine as well. Shorewall is REDIREC-ing port 80 traffic to squid. Currently Squid

[squid-users] Transparent Vs Non-transparent proxy

2009-12-09 Thread Asim Ahmed @ Folio3
Hi, I need an expert opinion on best suitable setup for my requirement. I am running shorewall 4.4 on RHEL 5 for NATTING/FIREWALLING. I've installed SQUID-3.0STABLE20-1 on that same machine as well. Shorewall is REDIREC-ing port 80 traffic to squid. Currently Squid was running in transparent