fre 2006-02-24 klockan 21:49 +0100 skrev Tomasz Kolaj:
I found in archive:
http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/200212/0119.html
How is it possible to get 2833 requests/second on 2xP3 1,4GHz box? Is it
true?
In a reverse proxy with epoll and a high hit ratio near 100% it is
Dnia wtorek, 28 lutego 2006 10:11, Henrik Nordstrom napisał:
fre 2006-02-24 klockan 21:49 +0100 skrev Tomasz Kolaj:
I found in archive:
http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/200212/0119.html
How is it possible to get 2833 requests/second on 2xP3 1,4GHz box? Is it
true?
In
Dnia czwartek, 23 lutego 2006 16:17, Matus UHLAR - fantomas napisał:
On 23.02 14:25, Tomasz Kolaj wrote:
Dnia czwartek, 23 lutego 2006 11:32, napisałeś:
On 22.02 23:13, Tomasz Kolaj wrote:
I observed have too low performance. On 2x 64bit Xeon 2,8GHz 2GB
DDR2, 2x WD RAPTOR Squid
Dnia poniedziałek, 27 lutego 2006 10:28, Matus UHLAR - fantomas napisał:
refresh_pattern -i (.*jpg$|.*gif$|.*png$) 0 50% 28800
refresh_pattern -i (.*html$|.*htm|.*shtml|.*php) 0 20% 1440
acl mGG dstdomain .adserver.gadugadu.pl .adserver.gadu-gadu.pl
redirector_access deny !mGG
I'd use
Dnia czwartek, 23 lutego 2006 16:17, Matus UHLAR - fantomas napisał:
On 23.02 14:25, Tomasz Kolaj wrote:
Dnia czwartek, 23 lutego 2006 11:32, napisałeś:
On 22.02 23:13, Tomasz Kolaj wrote:
I observed have too low performance. On 2x 64bit Xeon 2,8GHz 2GB
DDR2, 2x WD RAPTOR Squid
Hello,
I found in archive:
http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/200212/0119.html
How is it possible to get 2833 requests/second on 2xP3 1,4GHz box? Is it true?
My result is poor in compare to his result;) (my max 135 requests/second with
95% usage of processor with logging turned
Dnia czwartek, 23 lutego 2006 01:11, napisałeś:
* High latency clients
What do you mean high latecy clients?
The majority of my customers have a network path like:
client-squid-satellite-squid-internet
many of my clients: client-[radio line {12,34,54}mbps]-squid-internet
100
On 22.02 23:13, Tomasz Kolaj wrote:
I observed have too low performance. On 2x 64bit Xeon 2,8GHz 2GB DDR2, 2x
WD RAPTOR Squid 2.5.STABLE12 can answer max for 120 requests/s. 115 r/s -
97-98% usage of first processor. Second is unusable for squid :/. I have
two cache_dirs (aufs). One pre disk.
Dnia czwartek, 23 lutego 2006 11:32, napisałeś:
On 22.02 23:13, Tomasz Kolaj wrote:
I observed have too low performance. On 2x 64bit Xeon 2,8GHz 2GB DDR2, 2x
WD RAPTOR Squid 2.5.STABLE12 can answer max for 120 requests/s. 115 r/s
- 97-98% usage of first processor. Second is unusable for
On 23.02 14:25, Tomasz Kolaj wrote:
Dnia czwartek, 23 lutego 2006 11:32, napisałeś:
On 22.02 23:13, Tomasz Kolaj wrote:
I observed have too low performance. On 2x 64bit Xeon 2,8GHz 2GB DDR2, 2x
WD RAPTOR Squid 2.5.STABLE12 can answer max for 120 requests/s. 115 r/s
- 97-98% usage of
Hopefully that's just a misspelling. ;o)
Why?;) I did some wrong?
I'm testing epool patch like you said;
What he meant, I think, was that it's poll, not pool... therefore,
--enable-epool won't do a thing.
-Original Message-
From: Tomasz Kolaj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 10:01 AM
To: Chris Robertson
Subject: Re: [squid-users] low squid performance?
Dnia czwartek, 23 lutego 2006 01:11, napisałeś:
* High latency clients
What do you mean high
Dnia czwartek, 23 lutego 2006 18:32, napisałeś:
With epoll, 100 Req/sec puts my CPU at 23%. It made a huge difference.
I have still that same CPU usage.. mayby I aplied not this patch?
More memory and more spindles (drives) certainly won't hurt, but you seem
to be CPU limited. Taking care
-Original Message-
From: Tomasz Kolaj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 11:17 AM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] low squid performance?
Dnia czwartek, 23 lutego 2006 18:32, napisałeś:
With epoll, 100 Req/sec puts my CPU
Hello,
I observed have too low performance. On 2x 64bit Xeon 2,8GHz 2GB DDR2, 2x WD
RAPTOR Squid 2.5.STABLE12 can answer max for 120 requests/s.
115 r/s - 97-98% usage of first processor. Second is unusable for squid :/. I
have two cache_dirs (aufs). One pre disk.
aragorn ~ # squid -v
Squid
Hello,
I observed have too low performance. On 2x 64bit Xeon 2,8GHz 2GB DDR2, 2x WD
RAPTOR Squid 2.5.STABLE12 can answer max for 120 requests/s.
115 r/s - 97-98% usage of first processor. Second is unusable for squid :/. I
have two cache_dirs (aufs). One pre disk.
aragorn ~ # squid -v
Dnia środa, 22 lutego 2006 23:18, Mark Elsen napisał:
- Make your own build and installation of SQUID; configure only those
options which you need.
This may help for performance too.
Ok, I'll rebuild squid without not-needed options. I have top squid's usage at
18:00-21:00 so I'll check
-Original Message-
From: Tomasz Kolaj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 1:30 PM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] low squid performance?
Dnia środa, 22 lutego 2006 23:18, Mark Elsen napisał:
- Make your own build
Dnia środa, 22 lutego 2006 23:57, Chris Robertson napisał:
[cut]
The answer to that question is dependant on a whole host of variables, such
as ACLs used, whether it's a proxy or an accelerator, the types of clients
accessing it (client latency has a dramatic effect on CPU usage), types of
-Original Message-
From: Tomasz Kolaj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 2:24 PM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] low squid performance?
Dnia środa, 22 lutego 2006 23:57, Chris Robertson napisał:
[cut]
The answer
20 matches
Mail list logo
