rihad wrote:
Chris Robertson wrote:
rihad wrote:
Squid using almost twice as much memory as was accounted for
(according to top(1)):
4243 squid 29 200 1325M 1317M kserel 42:39 0.00%
squid
Is this expected?
From
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/SquidMemory#head-0b5e4
Chris Robertson wrote:
rihad wrote:
Squid using almost twice as much memory as was accounted for
(according to top(1)):
4243 squid 29 200 1325M 1317M kserel 42:39 0.00% squid
Is this expected?
From
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/SquidMemory#head-0b5e485f61e7ea4e580c
rihad wrote:
Squid using almost twice as much memory as was accounted for
(according to top(1)):
4243 squid 29 200 1325M 1317M kserel 42:39 0.00% squid
Is this expected?
From
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/SquidMemory#head-0b5e485f61e7ea4e580c60f45177f0bbcf7d7b80
.
Hi Rihad,
rihad wrote:
Squid using almost twice as much memory as was accounted for (according
to top(1)):
4243 squid 29 200 1325M 1317M kserel 42:39 0.00% squid
Since last time, after you reduced your cache_mem from 1000 MB to 300
MB, your Squid memory usage has gone down b
Squid using almost twice as much memory as was accounted for (according
to top(1)):
4243 squid 29 200 1325M 1317M kserel 42:39 0.00% squid
Is this expected?
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p8
Squid 2.6.16 using kqueue, aufs.
Some squid.conf lines:
cache_mem 300 MB
cache_replacement_policy
Squid using almost twice as much memory as was accounted for (according
to top(1)):
4243 squid 29 200 1325M 1317M kserel 42:39 0.00% squid
Is this expected?
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p8
Squid 2.6.16 using kqueue, aufs.
Some squid.conf lines:
cache_mem 300 MB
cache_replacement_polic
