--On 22 September 2004 19:42 +0200 Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Alex Sharaz wrote:
Is there any way I can perform the authentication scheme over a secure
connection
Pick one (or two):
* Use of Digest authentication.
* Use of NTLM authentication.
hmmm got to
--On 23 September 2004 12:49 +0200 Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Alex Sharaz wrote:
This sounds interesting, given that almost every man and his dog is
using IE or mozilla/firefox anyone know if they suport proxy
connections over ssl?
Not last time I looked,
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Alex Sharaz wrote:
Still, I'll have a play and see what we can do. It would be better if there
was some way of not having to install something on the client.
There is, but as already noted in this thread when combining different
authentication systems the end result is the
Chaps,
I'm currently using a basic auth scheme on our squid caches that uses a
radius authentication module
From the squid FAQ
NOTE: The name and password are encoded using ``base64'' (See section 11.1
of RFC 2616). However, base64 is a binary-to-text encoding only, it does
NOT encrypt the
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Alex Sharaz wrote:
Is there any way I can perform the authentication scheme over a secure
connection
Pick one (or two):
* Use of Digest authentication.
* Use of NTLM authentication.
* SSL encryption of the client-proxy traffic. Requires a client wich
supports SSL encryption
