Re: [squid-users] question about large rock

2014-02-13 Thread Alex Rousskov
> Alex Rousskov wrote: >> 1. optimizing Rock code so that it can rebuild faster >> 2. optimizing your OS so that it can read disk faster >> 3. optimizing your disks so that they can read faster On 02/13/2014 10:13 AM, k simon wrote: > I wonder to > know does the rock store's 32KB slot means that

Re: [squid-users] question about large rock

2014-02-13 Thread k simon
> >> 3,Can large rock support range splice? > > I do not think Squid itself supports range splicing. If Squid supports > them, Rock store should support them as well. > I think I expressed my thoughts not clearly. The wiki http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/LargeRockStore shows largerock

Re: [squid-users] question about large rock

2014-02-13 Thread k simon
于 13/2/14 上午7:08, Alex Rousskov 写道: > On 02/12/2014 09:23 AM, k simon wrote: > >> I >> create a 16GB size "rock" and limit the swap rate to 200, swap timeout >> to 300. >>When it's full filled, I reconfigured it. Iostat display the disk rps >> is about 200/s and throughput about 4MBytes/s. I

Re: [squid-users] question about large rock

2014-02-12 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 02/12/2014 09:23 AM, k simon wrote: > I > create a 16GB size "rock" and limit the swap rate to 200, swap timeout > to 300. > When it's full filled, I reconfigured it. Iostat display the disk rps > is about 200/s and throughput about 4MBytes/s. It's spent 61 minutes to > rebuilding sucessfull

Re: [squid-users] question about large rock

2014-02-12 Thread k simon
Hi,Alex: I tested rock storage again with real traffic. It's about 300req/s, 60-80Mbit/s. Squid verison is 3.3.11 and on freebsd 10-stable box. I create a 16GB size "rock" and limit the swap rate to 200, swap timeout to 300. When it's full filled, I reconfigured it. Iostat display the disk rps

Re: [squid-users] question about large rock

2014-01-27 Thread k simon
Thanks. 于 28/1/14 上午2:59, Alex Rousskov 写道: > On 01/27/2014 05:26 AM, k simon wrote: > >>I noticed large rock have merged to squid 3.5, I have some question >> about your large rock patch. > > > Hello Simon, > >> 1,Does large rock support non-SMP instance? > > Yes. Rock store can be use

Re: [squid-users] question about large rock

2014-01-27 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 01/27/2014 05:26 AM, k simon wrote: > I noticed large rock have merged to squid 3.5, I have some question > about your large rock patch. Hello Simon, > 1,Does large rock support non-SMP instance? Yes. Rock store can be used in non-SMP mode (as defined at [1]). Rock store uses blocking di

[squid-users] question about large rock

2014-01-27 Thread k simon
Hi,Alex, I noticed large rock have merged to squid 3.5, I have some question about your large rock patch. 1,Does large rock support non-SMP instance? I know the rock store must used with worker. 2,Does large rock solve rebuilding time too long issue? 3,Can large rock support range splice? Maybe