On Thu, Jan 17, 2008, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
> I am using squid 2.7.DEVEL0-20080112 on one of my proxy servers since 4
> days now.
>
> Seems quite stable and running well :D
Good to know! Thanks.
Adrian
Hi Adrian,
Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've had a couple of people report that Squid-2.7 snapshots are working
for them. We had a couple of memory leak hiccups which were sorted out
reasonably quickly.
I'd like to get Squid-2.7 released as soon as possible so I can continue
with the code
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008, Robert Collins wrote:
> > 3.x: has some internal code restructuring, is a C/C++ hybrid, includes
> > integrated ICAP support; Amos has ipv6 support included in 3.HEAD.
>
> IIRC tagged delay pools were merged, definitely per-user delay pools
> (class 4 pools) support was
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 09:52 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2008, Marcus Kool wrote:
>
> > I tried the FAQ and Squid website for some more info but I found none.
> > The RoadMap2 and RoadMap3 are a bit vague to draw any conclusions.
>
> Thats because we're developers, not documentat
Ok thanks.
btw, what's the difference between these two paramters when compiling squid 3.0?
--enable-storeio=aufs
--with-aio
does 2.7 version support AIO feature?
On Jan 14, 2008 10:03 AM, Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2008, J. Peng wrote:
>
> > Do yu mean Squid 3.0 i
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008, J. Peng wrote:
> Do yu mean Squid 3.0 is based on 2.5 version, and Squid 2.7 is coming
> from 2.6 version?
Squid-3.0 is as much based on Squid-2.5 as Squid-2.7 is based on Squid-2.5.
It's a common ancestor but plenty of development has gone into both
Squid-2 and Squid-3 to m
On Jan 14, 2008 8:47 AM, Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm just confused and upset, since squid 3.0 was already released
> > officially, why keeping to release the lower version of squid yet?
>
> Who else is confused about Squid-2 vs Squid-3 btw?
>
Do yu mean Squid 3.0 is based on 2.
> I'm just confused and upset, since squid 3.0 was already released
> officially, why keeping to release the lower version of squid yet?
Who else is confused about Squid-2 vs Squid-3 btw?
Adrian
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008, Marcus Kool wrote:
> I tried the FAQ and Squid website for some more info but I found none.
> The RoadMap2 and RoadMap3 are a bit vague to draw any conclusions.
Thats because we're developers, not documentation authors. :)
> Can you be more elaborate ? What are the major d
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008, J. Peng wrote:
I'm just confused and upset, since squid 3.0 was already released
officially, why keeping to release the lower version of squid yet?
Ah, version number madness. They're diverging code trains. Squid-2.7
is the continuation of the Squid-2
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008, J. Peng wrote:
> I'm just confused and upset, since squid 3.0 was already released
> officially, why keeping to release the lower version of squid yet?
Ah, version number madness. They're diverging code trains. Squid-2.7
is the continuation of the Squid-2 codebase. Squid-3.0
I'm just confused and upset, since squid 3.0 was already released
officially, why keeping to release the lower version of squid yet?
On Jan 12, 2008 7:42 PM, Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like to get Squid-2.7 released as soon as possible so I can continue
> with the code restruc
Hi everyone,
I've had a couple of people report that Squid-2.7 snapshots are working
for them. We had a couple of memory leak hiccups which were sorted out
reasonably quickly.
I'd like to get Squid-2.7 released as soon as possible so I can continue
with the code restructuring and performance impr
13 matches
Mail list logo
