sön 2008-01-13 klockan 16:26 +0545 skrev Tek Bahadur Limbu:
Hi Adrian,
So does that mean that there will be no Squid-2.6.19?
Hard to say. Depends on what bugs gets known in 2.6 and when 2.7 gets
released.
Will Squid-2.6.STABLE19 be Squid-2.7.STABLE1 ?
You can't make an equal between the
sön 2008-01-13 klockan 20:03 +0900 skrev Adrian Chadd:
I'm not aware that the Squid volunteers have ever given a lifetime
for a Squid release. I think, given that its all volunteer work,
that what we've been supporting is pretty good. :)
Generally maintenance of one release stops when there
mån 2008-01-14 klockan 10:29 +0900 skrev Adrian Chadd:
No, Squid-2.7 doesn't support all of HTTP/1.1. Squid-2 is just starting to
grow
the internal restructuring that will make HTTP/1.1 compliance easier to
achieve
without massive shoehorning and sledgehammering of the required concepts.
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 10:34 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
The majority of the Squid development over the last few years has been
driven by specifically funded projects. This has the advantage of getting
work done, but the disadvantage that stuff is really just pushed in
to get the work
Hi Adrian,
So does that mean that there will be no Squid-2.6.19?
Will Squid-2.6.STABLE19 be Squid-2.7.STABLE1 ?
Thanking you...
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008, Marcus Kool wrote:
I tried the FAQ and Squid website for some more info but I found none.
The RoadMap2 and RoadMap3 are
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
Hi Adrian,
So does that mean that there will be no Squid-2.6.19?
Will Squid-2.6.STABLE19 be Squid-2.7.STABLE1 ?
I'm not aware that the Squid volunteers have ever given a lifetime
for a Squid release. I think, given that its all volunteer work,
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
Hi Adrian,
So does that mean that there will be no Squid-2.6.19?
Will Squid-2.6.STABLE19 be Squid-2.7.STABLE1 ?
I'm not aware that the Squid volunteers have ever given a lifetime
for a Squid release. I think, given that its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Well.
I've had squid-3 in production doing ssl reverse-proxy custom stuff
since 2 years ago. Shame on me, for believing the squid developers when
they said, expect a squid-3 release rsn.
On the c++ front, I submitted code trivially using STL
The decision was made a while ago to not use the STL for various reasons.
These mostly included portability and bugs in the compiler and STL libraries.
I'm guessing that these have mostly been fixed.
Thing is, the STL is great until you need to optimise for performance,
then you need to know a
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008, Matt Benjamin wrote:
I'm happy to see forward movement in any direction. However, I think
it's strongly in the interest of all Squid developers and users to get
together and structure a single road-map to a future that is really
delivered, with frequent incremental
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 09:52 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008, Marcus Kool wrote:
I tried the FAQ and Squid website for some more info but I found none.
The RoadMap2 and RoadMap3 are a bit vague to draw any conclusions.
Thats because we're developers, not documentation
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008, Robert Collins wrote:
3.x: has some internal code restructuring, is a C/C++ hybrid, includes
integrated ICAP support; Amos has ipv6 support included in 3.HEAD.
IIRC tagged delay pools were merged, definitely per-user delay pools
(class 4 pools) support was
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008, Brett Lymn wrote:
I am not sure if the squid project has (or considered) putting their
hand up for the Google Summer of Code. This can give a bit of a cash
injection to the project and, if you are very careful, get someone to
work on some much needed features.
Lack of
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 12:40:26PM +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Lack of developer time :)
Ah but if you are careful and get the right person then you get
someone to work on much needed features with a small investment of
developer time - sometimes the person actually continues contributing
to
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008, J. Peng wrote:
I'm just confused and upset, since squid 3.0 was already released
officially, why keeping to release the lower version of squid yet?
Ah, version number madness. They're diverging code trains. Squid-2.7
is the continuation of the
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008, Marcus Kool wrote:
I tried the FAQ and Squid website for some more info but I found none.
The RoadMap2 and RoadMap3 are a bit vague to draw any conclusions.
Thats because we're developers, not documentation authors. :)
Can you be more elaborate ? What are the major
16 matches
Mail list logo
