hi, did you see this message ?
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 01:49:10PM -0300, Carlos Defoe wrote:
Well, it seems that the problem has returned.
Now i think it might be caused when logrotate runs, and therefore
squid -k rotate. It's just a guess, since rotating is the only
action that affects
Well, it seems that the problem has returned.
Now i think it might be caused when logrotate runs, and therefore
squid -k rotate. It's just a guess, since rotating is the only
action that affects Squid. It didn't has been restarted since last
time it was working fine.
:¬(
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at
Hallo, Amos,
Du meintest am 18.05.13:
I have enabled squidGuard within a huge network.
[...]
What are you using squidGuard for anyway?
There are 2 different options/decisions:
a) using redirect/rewrite (as squidGuard and ufdbguard do) or
using the squid options acl and http_access (as
Ok, apparently the problem with squidGuard was related to corrupted
databases, causing unpredictably behaviour. I recompiled everything
and now is working fine.
I'll think about the suggestions (ufdbguard and raw squid), and maybe
write down a comparison.
thanks guys!
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at
Hallo, Amos,
Du meintest am 18.05.13:
SG has numerous problems which caused it not to do what it's
supposed to, including that emergency mode thing. Here are some
things to consider:
1) a BIG blacklist is overhyped - when I had a good look at our
requirements, there was only a small
On Sat, 18 May 2013 17:32:02 +1200
Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:58:42 +1200
Amos Jeffries wrote:
a BIG blacklist is overhyped
For the record that is a mis-attribution. I did not say that.
Amos
Pardon my bad email etiquette, I'm using a wierd
On 18/05/2013 6:23 p.m., Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, Amos,
Du meintest am 18.05.13:
SG has numerous problems which caused it not to do what it's
supposed to, including that emergency mode thing. Here are some
things to consider:
1) a BIG blacklist is overhyped - when I had a good look at our
Hallo, Amos,
Du meintest am 18.05.13:
[...]
The squidguard job is working with a really big blacklist. And
working with some specialized ACLs.
Which apart from the list files, is all based on received information
sent to it by Squid.
I know squid can do this job too - and I maintain a
On 05/17/2013 11:40 PM, csn233 wrote:
You can use ufdbGuard free.
So it's the filter DB component that's not free. Thanks for clarifying.
No. ufdbGuard is free software, the same as squidguard.
ufdbGuard works with free databases or your own URL blacklist, just like
squidguard.
So it's the filter DB component that's not free. Thanks for clarifying.
No. ufdbGuard is free software, the same as squidguard.
I was refering to URLfilterDB which is the paid component by the looks
of it: The license is both for use of URLfilterDB and subscription to
regular content updates
a BIG blacklist is overhyped
Nonsense, porn blacklists are big by nature have you tried
squid-porn.acl lately?
Squidblacklist.org is the new kid on the blacklist block, and our porn
blacklist is fantastic.
If you actually read what I said, which was there was only a small
percentage of
Hello,
I have enabled squidGuard within a huge network. Problem is that most
of the matches to my acls are logged (a block.log file), but the site
is still accessible. When i press F5 to reload, multiple times, one
time it got blocked (redirected to my local block page, published
with apache
On 18/05/2013 1:14 a.m., Carlos Defoe wrote:
Hello,
I have enabled squidGuard within a huge network. Problem is that most
of the matches to my acls are logged (a block.log file), but the site
is still accessible. When i press F5 to reload, multiple times, one
time it got blocked (redirected to
Hi Amos,
One big blacklist. Secondarily, it matches ads on each page to change
it to our logo, so it reduces bandwitdh usage, stops annoying ads and
makes our marketing thing.
Do you think squidGuard is not working properly, then?
Redirector Statistics:
program:
Has anyone experienced this?
SG has numerous problems which caused it not to do what it's supposed
to, including that emergency mode thing. Here are some things to
consider:
1) a BIG blacklist is overhyped - when I had a good look at our
requirements, there was only a small percentage of those
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:28:20AM +0800, csn233 wrote:
Has anyone experienced this?
SG has numerous problems which caused it not to do what it's supposed
to, including that emergency mode thing. Here are some things to
consider:
1) a BIG blacklist is overhyped - when I had a good look
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:09 AM, csn233 csn...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't bother spending any more time on it.
ufdbGuard is a more powerful substitute of squidGuard.
Has regular updates and even free support.
Marcus
Sure. You forgot to mention though, squidGuard is free whereas
ufdbGuard is
Hallo, csn233,
Du meintest am 18.05.13:
SG has numerous problems which caused it not to do what it's supposed
to, including that emergency mode thing. Here are some things to
consider:
1) a BIG blacklist is overhyped - when I had a good look at our
requirements, there was only a small
On Sat, 18 May 2013 01:27:36 +0800
csn233 csn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:09 AM, csn233 csn...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't bother spending any more time on it.
ufdbGuard is a more powerful substitute of squidGuard.
Has regular updates and even free support.
Marcus
Hallo, csn233,
Du meintest am 18.05.13:
I can't see a big need for updating. Software really doesn't need
changes (updates) every month or so.
No, it doesn't - until you have a problem.
That depends! - I know many colleagues who use squidguard since
years; the program doesn't need much
Because I can.
Sorry, more relevant question would be - do you have an answer for the
original poster?
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 01:27:36AM +0800, csn233 wrote:
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:09 AM, csn233 csn...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't bother spending any more time on it.
ufdbGuard is a more powerful substitute of squidGuard.
Has regular updates and even free support.
Marcus
Sure. You
Hallo, csn233,
Du meintest am 18.05.13:
Because I can.
Sorry, more relevant question would be - do you have an answer for
the original poster?
No. I don't run a huge network with the problem he has described.
I only run networks with about 50 ... 200 clients, and there I never had
this
I'll run some more tests before getting rid of squidguard. I think the
idea of the rewriter sounds good. Also the use of berkeleydb to read
blacklists.
I've used squidguard in the past, in small networks, without any problems.
If it were running properly now, then i would have a great
You can use ufdbGuard free.
So it's the filter DB component that's not free. Thanks for clarifying.
On 18/05/2013 5:53 a.m., Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, csn233,
Du meintest am 18.05.13:
SG has numerous problems which caused it not to do what it's supposed
to, including that emergency mode thing. Here are some things to
consider:
1) a BIG blacklist is overhyped - when I had a good look at
On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:58:42 +1200
Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
a BIG blacklist is overhyped
Nonsense, porn blacklists are big by nature have you tried
squid-porn.acl lately?
Squidblacklist.org is the new kid on the blacklist block, and our porn
blacklist is fantastic.
-
Signed,
On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:58:42 +1200
Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On 18/05/2013 5:53 a.m., Helmut Hullen wrote:
Hallo, csn233,
Du meintest am 18.05.13:
SG has numerous problems which caused it not to do what it's
supposed to, including that emergency mode thing. Here are
On 18/05/2013 4:52 p.m., Squidblacklist wrote:
On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:58:42 +1200
Amos Jeffries wrote:
a BIG blacklist is overhyped
For the record that is a mis-attribution. I did not say that.
Amos
29 matches
Mail list logo
