yep, it is an ip based authentication.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On 23/02/2013 8:48 a.m., Roman Gelfand wrote:
Please, consider the network topology below. I could always configure
outgoing http traffic on the firewall to authenticate with
On 24/02/2013 4:35 p.m., Roman Gelfand wrote:
yep, it is an ip based authentication.
Ah. Which is not authentication. But authorization.
Squid can also do that in transparent mode. The limitation is only about
use of HTTP auth headers on intercepted traffic.
You simply configure an
Please, consider the network topology below. I could always configure
outgoing http traffic on the firewall to authenticate with firewall
user. How is this different from having squid authenticate in
transparent mode?
WAN
On 23/02/2013 8:48 a.m., Roman Gelfand wrote:
Please, consider the network topology below. I could always configure
outgoing http traffic on the firewall to authenticate with firewall
user. How is this different from having squid authenticate in
transparent mode?
That is a good question.
I guess the 2 don't mix as per NOTICE: Authentication not applicable
on intercepted requests. message.
Would it follow user access control via transparent proxy? or is there
a way around the above limitation?
Thanks in advance
On 21/02/2013 4:42 a.m., Roman Gelfand wrote:
I guess the 2 don't mix as per NOTICE: Authentication not applicable
on intercepted requests. message.
Would it follow user access control via transparent proxy? or is there
a way around the above limitation?
Please read the Interception Proxy
. No problems, Im
having a looking at NoCatSplash (catch-and-release) software to see if this
will work.
Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Crow [mailto:a...@nanogherkin.com]
Sent: 03 October 2011 17:57
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Transparent Proxy ntlm
On 05/10/11 03:36, Almighty wrote:
Thanks for that Alex.
I have used wpad in the past but I had to ensure that the browsers had
Automatically detect settings ticked. It's for a wireless network so they
are not on our domain. We purely use NTLM for authentication and
verification that they are
Hi,
I am redirecting my clients to my proxy server transparently using IPTABLES,
-A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp -i eth0 --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 8080
I am also using ntlm authentication that forces all connections to
authentication to AD.
The redirect works fine except squid says Cache
Almighty,
You can't do transparent and NTLM auth together, as in order to do NTLM
the browser must be configured to know it's using a proxy. Unless, as
your handle suggests, you are indeed omnipotent ;-)
This question and ones like it come up a lot - and there is a simple
solution if you
: Chin Kah Yi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED], Squid Users
squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re:[squid-users] transparent proxy with authentication
Date: 8/11/2005 21:53
Thanks for the comment. I was away for a while.
You have mentioned that such authentication
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Chin Kah Yi wrote:
Are there anyone out there who has configured squid to perform this kind of
cacheing before? i.e. squid on wccp with cisco router while providing http
authentication to end-users.
No.
If there is none and I wish doing so, would it really be possible?
?
Kah Yi
Original Message
From: Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chin Kah Yi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Squid Users squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re:[squid-users] transparent proxy with authentication
Date: 29/10/2005 02:22
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Chin Kah Yi wrote:
I see. Do
Hello Henrik,
I understood your explanation like this.
client - proxy Internet
The Scenario is Transparent proxy Authentication using Cookies, and all the
traffics are passed through the proxy. When the user access a web page for
the first time, he is redirected to a login page say
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Chin Kah Yi wrote:
I see. but if it is transparent proxy via wccp, how would the IP based access
control scheme work on bluecoat as bluecoat wouldn't be inline to do access
control and depending on cisco router?
It is inline for HTTP traffic. The proxy can do whatever
PROTECTED], squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re:[squid-users] transparent proxy with authentication
Date: 28/10/2005 19:14
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Chin Kah Yi wrote:
I see. but if it is transparent proxy via wccp, how would the IP
based access control scheme work on bluecoat as bluecoat wouldn't
-users@squid-cache.org
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] transparent proxy with authentication
I see. Do you think the design where cookies were used to keep track of
per-user authentication details at client browser is a feasible and good
design?
Original
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Chin Kah Yi wrote:
I see. Do you think the design where cookies were used to keep track of
per-user authentication details at client browser is a feasible and good
design?
It is a hack. And fails badly for all other applications than browsing as
it is not a standard
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Senthil Murugan wrote:
I just wanted to know how cookies are used for storing the username and
passwd. Bcos, i heard that cookies are domain dependent. So how cum it works
or am i wrong
The cookies are indeed domain dependent, but since the proxy has full
control of
@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re:[squid-users] transparent proxy with authentication
Date: 27/10/2005 09:30
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Chin Kah Yi wrote:
http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-17.html#ss17.16 that
authentication does not work with wccp. And I read somewhere in squid 3
development site
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Chin Kah Yi wrote:
If wccp with authentication does not work because of wccp design, Bluecoat
claimed their proxy supports wccp with authentication. I wonder how theirs
work?
It doesn't actually.
They do what you can do, implement a IP based access control sheme using
PROTECTED]
CC: Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED], squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re:[squid-users] transparent proxy with authentication
Date: 28/10/2005 00:57
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Chin Kah Yi wrote:
If wccp with authentication does not work because of wccp design,
Bluecoat claimed
?
Original Message
From: Chin Kah Yi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED], squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re:[squid-users] transparent proxy with authentication
Date: 28/10/2005 08:39
I see. but if it is transparent proxy via wccp, how would the IP based
access control
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Chin Kah Yi wrote:
http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-17.html#ss17.16 that
authentication does not work with wccp. And I read somewhere in squid 3
development site that there is an intention to enable such possibility,
I like to know if this is true.
You have
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:
Obviously, this leads to a condition where the HTTP client needs to supply
multiple credentials on every access. It is important to note that not all
HTTP clients are browsers (Firefox, Internet Explorer, Netscape, Safari,
etc.). Many are
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Chin Kah Yi wrote:
What if the design is changed from wccp to a redirection level7 switch such
as foundry serveriron? L7 switch redirect http traffic to squids. Will this
be able to design provide authentication from squid?
If you use a L7 load balancer with the
Dearest squid expert out there,
I have had squid boxes running on wccp with cisco router for my
customer. There are 2 new requirements lately:
(1) authentication with wccp
There comes a new requirement from my customer that every user should
be authenticated before being allowed to browse the
in computer labs where
anyone can use to access to internet. If you do have alternative control
mechanism, please advise.
Thanks again.
Kah Yi
Original Message
From: Merton Campbell Crockett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re:[squid-users] transparent
Crockett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re:[squid-users] transparent proxy with authentication
Date: 25/10/2005 10:47
On Monday 24 October 2005 18:36, Chin Kah Yi wrote:
Dearest squid expert out there,
Don't mind me being asking again - but why was authentication
Hai All,
If there is any way to setup transparent proxy with authentication
please give me those...
here i can setup transparent proxy and authentication but it didn't work
same time... (while i use transparent it didn't ask for authentication)
i want to use both in same time..
so help
On 03.12 14:25, Focuz Infotech wrote:
Hai All,
If there is any way to setup transparent proxy with authentication
please give me those...
here i can setup transparent proxy and authentication but it didn't work
same time... (while i use transparent it didn't ask for authentication)
Hai All,
If there is any way to setup transparent proxy with authentication
please give me those...
here i can setup transparent proxy and authentication but it
didn't work
same time... (while i use transparent it didn't ask for
authentication)
i want to use both in same
I have some Idea about transparent proxy with authentication but I dont
sure it makes sense or not, may be some one can craft this.
Im using backbone switch to route HTTP request to transparent squid and it
works fine. I know that no way (by now) to automatically pop up authen
screen for routed
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 10:30, Chettawan Senapant. wrote:
Im using backbone switch to route HTTP request to transparent squid and it
works fine. I know that no way (by now) to automatically pop up authen
screen for routed users while Im using transparent proxy. But suppose I
have some firewall
34 matches
Mail list logo
