Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?

2013-02-12 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
Many admins will be happy to know about these domains. Admins should properly maintained and fix them or maybe get some help in finding the culprit for the problem. As I posted before the ISOC list is full of requests for help regarding similar problems and solutions for them else then the way

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?

2013-02-12 Thread Petter Abrahamsson
f there is any alternatives? I thought that squid 3.2 is doing > parallel lookups to and A records? > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Februar 2013 10:54 > An: squid-users@squid-cache.org

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?

2013-02-12 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
Try to contact the dns servers maintainer using postmaster or any other relevant address. You can consult about it in ISOC mailing list. BIND has very nice logging options about lazy and problematic dns servers which can help you prevent these issues. It's a very common problem in the dns wo

Re: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?

2013-02-12 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
On 2/12/2013 2:09 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: No. A bug report will not make any difference here. dns_v4_first is about the sorting the results found, not the lookup order. is faster than A in most networks, so we perform that lookup first in 3.1. This was altered in 3.2 to perform happy-eyeba

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?

2013-02-12 Thread Sandrini Christian (xsnd)
el lookups to and A records? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz] Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Februar 2013 10:54 An: squid-users@squid-cache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored? On 12/02/2013 8:41 p.m., Sandrini

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?

2013-02-12 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 12/02/2013 8:41 p.m., Sandrini Christian (xsnd) wrote: Hi I have now enabled ipv6 3: eth1: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 00:50:56:a6:07:27 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 160.85.104.14/24 brd 160.85.104.255 scope global eth1 inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fea

AW: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?

2013-02-11 Thread Sandrini Christian (xsnd)
Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Februar 2013 01:10 An: squid-users@squid-cache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored? On 12/02/2013 12:17 p.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > I gave you an option to install on the squid server a BIND cache > server wasn't talking about you

Re: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?

2013-02-11 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 12/02/2013 12:17 p.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote: I gave you an option to install on the squid server a BIND cache server wasn't talking about your main DNS server. Note the you can always use a secondary dns instance to serve this purpose to filter responses. On 2/11/2013 2:48 PM, Sandr

Re: AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?

2013-02-11 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
I gave you an option to install on the squid server a BIND cache server wasn't talking about your main DNS server. Note the you can always use a secondary dns instance to serve this purpose to filter responses. On 2/11/2013 2:48 PM, Sandrini Christian (xsnd) wrote: Hi Thanks for your re

AW: AW: AW: [squid-users] Re: dns_v4_first on ignored?

2013-02-11 Thread Sandrini Christian (xsnd)
Hi Thanks for your reply. I can't really mess around with our main DNS servers. On our 3.1 squids we just disabled ipv6 module which does not sound right to me but works fine. What we see is 2013/01/30 09:52:00.296| idnsGrokReply: www2.zhlex.zh.ch query failed. Trying A now instead. We