Re: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs?

On 02/05/2011 12:32, Jannis Kafkoulas wrote: Thanks for the hint! I'll check it too. I think, we should also replace the ip dsts within all of the intermediate caches by domain names thus saving all of the unnecessary dns lookups (about 80% --> Internet). i dont know about the amount of traff

RE: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs?

Thanks for the hint! I'll check it too. I think, we should also replace the ip dsts within all of the intermediate caches by domain names thus saving all of the unnecessary dns lookups (about 80% --> Internet). Yes, we have a local caching dns. - Ursprüngliche Mail Von: Eliezer Croi

Re: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs?

On 28/04/11 21:25, Jannis Kafkoulas wrote: Hi, We have a proxy chain of 3 squids (v2.7, RHEL5). In my opinion only the last one needs really to resolve the URLs name in order to send the request directly to the web servers ip address in the Internet. Sort of, only the proxy going DIRECT *has

Re: [squid-users] Does any cache in a proxy chain but the last one need to resolve URLs?

On 28/04/2011 12:25, Jannis Kafkoulas wrote: Hi, We have a proxy chain of 3 squids (v2.7, RHEL5). In my opinion only the last one needs really to resolve the URLs name in order to send the request directly to the web servers ip address in the Internet. Would it also work if the first two prox