On 02/12/2014 08:04 PM, Rajiv Desai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using squid cache as a forward caching proxy.
>
> CONTEXT:
>
> For my use case since:
> 1. the average object size is ~80KB (moreover > 32KB),
> 2. the proxy server has multiple cores available
> 3. the throughput requirement is high (upt
On 30/03/2011 00:45, "Amos Jeffries" wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:09:20 +0200, Fran Márquez wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is the Negotiate auth protocol faster than NTLM or it also increase
>> (x2 or x3) the http traffic when is used?
>>
>> Regards,
>> F.J
>
> Negotiate is a wrapper protocol, so the an
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:09:20 +0200, Fran Márquez wrote:
Hi,
Is the Negotiate auth protocol faster than NTLM or it also increase
(x2 or x3) the http traffic when is used?
Regards,
F.J
Negotiate is a wrapper protocol, so the answer is maybe.
In modern browsers it commonly wraps Kerberos auth.
On 19/03/11 10:53, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 18/03/11 10:05, da...@lang.hm wrote:
ping, any comments on this?
excluding acl's, cache_peer* and *direct config entries (~500 lines
worth, all IP, servername, port
On 19/03/11 10:44, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 18/03/11 21:54, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Some are offset by optimizations and fixes later, so its not
cut-n-dry. Work is underway by Alex and Co. to identify the probl
On 19/03/11 04:32, Alex Crow wrote:
Hi,
Which directive of these should be just "cache" in 3.1?
The one which used to be called "no_cache" back in Squid-2.2.
Amos
So
cache deny all
is the same as
no_cache deny all?
Yes. They are identical, except that recently Squid will throw warnin
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 18/03/11 10:05, da...@lang.hm wrote:
ping, any comments on this?
excluding acl's, cache_peer* and *direct config entries (~500 lines
worth, all IP, servername, port# or url_regex based)
Tested with or wi
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 18/03/11 21:54, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Some are offset by optimizations and fixes later, so its not
cut-n-dry. Work is underway by Alex and Co. to identify the problems.
We all work on ways to grab performa
Hi,
Which directive of these should be just "cache" in 3.1?
The one which used to be called "no_cache" back in Squid-2.2.
Amos
So
cache deny all
is the same as
no_cache deny all?
Alex
On 18/03/11 22:50, Alex Crow wrote:
cache_log /var/log/squid/cache.log
cache_store_log none
coredump_dir none
no_cache deny all
NP: directive name is just "cache".
Hi,
Which directive of these should be just "cache" in 3.1?
The one which used to be called "no_cache" back in Squid-2.2.
cache_log /var/log/squid/cache.log
cache_store_log none
coredump_dir none
no_cache deny all
NP: directive name is just "cache".
Hi,
Which directive of these should be just "cache" in 3.1?
Thanks
Alex
On 18/03/11 21:54, da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Some are offset by optimizations and fixes later, so its not
cut-n-dry. Work is underway by Alex and Co. to identify the problems.
We all work on ways to grab performance back when found. Most of these
optimizat
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 18/03/11 10:05, da...@lang.hm wrote:
ping, any comments on this?
excluding acl's, cache_peer* and *direct config entries (~500 lines
worth, all IP, servername, port# or url_regex based)
Tested with or without all those ACLs? They do make a differe
On 18/03/11 10:05, da...@lang.hm wrote:
ping, any comments on this?
excluding acl's, cache_peer* and *direct config entries (~500 lines
worth, all IP, servername, port# or url_regex based)
Tested with or without all those ACLs? They do make a difference to
speed, even the fast ACL tests.
ping, any comments on this?
excluding acl's, cache_peer* and *direct config entries (~500 lines
worth, all IP, servername, port# or url_regex based)
the remaining config file is
http_port 8000
icp_port 0
visible_hostname gromit1
cache_effective_user proxy
cache_effective_group proxy
appaend_d
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:36:49 -0600, Baird, Josh wrote:
Are there any docs that reference performance differences between
2.6/7
and 3.1? I'm running several 2.6 clusters (forward proxy) with all
caching disabled doing 20-30mbps per node. The nodes are not far
from
idle in terms of CPU and memo
2011/1/8 Amos Jeffries :
> On 08/01/11 06:22, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
>>
>> 2011/1/8 Mohsen Saeedi:
>>>
>>> I know about coss. it's great. but i have squid 3.1 and i think it's
>>> unstable in 3.x version. that's correct?
>>
>> I need "null" for memory-only cache, which is not provided in squid-3,
>>
On 08/01/11 06:22, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
2011/1/8 Mohsen Saeedi:
I know about coss. it's great. but i have squid 3.1 and i think it's
unstable in 3.x version. that's correct?
I need "null" for memory-only cache, which is not provided in squid-3,
so it's all squid-2.x in product environment.
2011/1/8 Mohsen Saeedi :
> I know about coss. it's great. but i have squid 3.1 and i think it's
> unstable in 3.x version. that's correct?
I need "null" for memory-only cache, which is not provided in squid-3,
so it's all squid-2.x in product environment.
Of cource, we tested every squid-3.x, many
I know about coss. it's great. but i have squid 3.1 and i think it's
unstable in 3.x version. that's correct?
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
> 2011/1/8 Mohsen Saeedi :
>> and now which filesystem has better performance. aufs or diskd? on the
>> SAS hdd for example.
>
> Neit
2011/1/8 Mohsen Saeedi :
> and now which filesystem has better performance. aufs or diskd? on the
> SAS hdd for example.
Neither of them, we are using coss on SATA. And coss on SSD is under
testing, looks good still.
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
>>
>> 2011/1/7 Amos Jef
and now which filesystem has better performance. aufs or diskd? on the
SAS hdd for example.
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
>
> 2011/1/7 Amos Jeffries :
> > On 07/01/11 19:08, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
> >>
> >> In order to get squid server 400M+ traffic, I did these:
> >> 1. Me
2011/1/7 Amos Jeffries :
> On 07/01/11 19:08, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
>>
>> In order to get squid server 400M+ traffic, I did these:
>> 1. Memory only
>> IO bottleneck is too hard to avoid at high traffic, so I did not use
>> harddisk, use only memory for HTTP cache. 32GB or 64GB memory per box
>> wo
On 07/01/11 19:08, Drunkard Zhang wrote:
In order to get squid server 400M+ traffic, I did these:
1. Memory only
IO bottleneck is too hard to avoid at high traffic, so I did not use
harddisk, use only memory for HTTP cache. 32GB or 64GB memory per box
works good.
NP: The problem in squid-2 is l
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 07:48:07 -0700, Andrei
wrote:
>>> 5) No NATing is done on this machine.
>>
>> Ah, "transparent" flag does not means what you think then.
>>
>> In Squid-3.2 and older it means "traffic arriving at this port has been
>> redirected here via NAT in the firewall".
>>
>> What did you
>> 5) No NATing is done on this machine.
>
> Ah, "transparent" flag does not means what you think then.
>
> In Squid-3.2 and older it means "traffic arriving at this port has been
> redirected here via NAT in the firewall".
>
> What did you actually want?
I have 300 kids with laptops. It would be
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:31:45 -0700, Andrei
wrote:
> Thank you so much! I'm not sure if I understood everything, but here
> is what I have so far.
>
> 1) 1GB of RAM in this machine (P4, 40GB IDE, 1GB RAM).
> 2) Running Squid 3.1.3 now :-)
> 3) Not sure what you meant with AUFS. Does this need to
Thank you so much! I'm not sure if I understood everything, but here
is what I have so far.
1) 1GB of RAM in this machine (P4, 40GB IDE, 1GB RAM).
2) Running Squid 3.1.3 now :-)
3) Not sure what you meant with AUFS. Does this need to be changed?
cache_dir ufs /var/spool/squid3 7000 16 256
4) Rand
On 18/09/10 06:00, Andrei wrote:
I'm a newbie. To get Squid started all I was able to do is create the
config below. This works but it feels like it could be a little
faster. I have about 300 users.
Are there any other options that you would recommend adding to this
config file? This is my config
Thanks, guys. This is a small network I guess. I'll leave it with one NIC.
Who knows what 300 kids with laptops will be doing.
I see Hit Ratio mentioned quite a bit. Can somebody give me good
performance tuning link/tips etc for Squid? I have default install on
Debian. I could probably fine tune i
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
>[...]
> For a faster internal connection and slower Internet connection you can
> look towards raising the Hit Ratio' probably the byte hits specifically.
> That will drop the load on the Internet line and make the
I only use 2 cards when one is on a private lan and the other on a
public routed interface.
And I usualy run up to 700 users on avarage on the boxes I build..
What are you expecting the 300 users to be doing?
Rob
On 29/08/2010 18:10, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
Hi!
On Sat, Aug 28
Hi!
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Andrei wrote:
> Ooo... the line between Squid and the clients is 1000 MB. My internet
> connection is 12MB. Not sure if that changes things. Does it? Would it
> make a difference in that situation if clients (from 1000Mb) come on
> one line, eth0 and get cach
Ooo... the line between Squid and the clients is 1000 MB. My internet
connection is 12MB. Not sure if that changes things. Does it? Would it
make a difference in that situation if clients (from 1000Mb) come on
one line, eth0 and get cached on eth1 which is only 12MB.
Sorry if I wasn't clear before
Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
Em 28/08/2010 12:29, Andrei escreveu:
I'm setting up a transparent Squid box for 300 users. All requests
from the router are sent to the Squid box. Squid box has one NIC,
eth0. This box receives requests (from clients) and catches content
from the web using this one NI
Em 28/08/2010 12:29, Andrei escreveu:
I'm setting up a transparent Squid box for 300 users. All requests
from the router are sent to the Squid box. Squid box has one NIC,
eth0. This box receives requests (from clients) and catches content
from the web using this one NIC on its one WAN port, eth0
tor 2010-04-01 klockan 16:26 -0500 skrev Kevin Blackwell:
> I know,
>
> But the problem with that is I have 30 users on a term server. Trying
> to track who's going where.
Which means you are pretty much stuck at using authentication.
Regards
Henrik
I know,
But the problem with that is I have 30 users on a term server. Trying
to track who's going where.
Sent from my PDA please excuse any typos.
On Apr 1, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Henrik Nordström
wrote:
ons 2010-03-31 klockan 19:45 -0300 skrev Guido Marino Lorenzutti:
NTLM kills perfor
ons 2010-03-31 klockan 19:45 -0300 skrev Guido Marino Lorenzutti:
> NTLM kills performance. I have the same problem. Any ideas are welcome.
IP based auth cache available in Squid-2.7 and pending to be ported to
Squid-3.
http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/authenticate_ip_shortcircuit_access/
ht
NTLM kills performance. I have the same problem. Any ideas are welcome.
Kevin Blackwell escribió:
1. NAT interception going on? or browser proxy configuration settings?
According to this page
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/AtSource
No
2. What Squid version?
Squid Cach
1. NAT interception going on? or browser proxy configuration settings?
According to this page
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/AtSource
No
2. What Squid version?
Squid Cache: Version 2.6.STABLE21
3. is DNS working properly and fast for the proxy?
I think so. DNS Lookups:
Kevin Blackwell wrote:
OK,
I will accept that a browser behind a proxy is going to load the pages
slower then a browser in front of the proxy.
But I need to trim some time on the page load.
I installed firebug. It can report load times of web pages.
http;//www.google.com will be example.
If
s Jeffries" , squid-users@squid-cache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2010 12:21:25 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: RE: [squid-users] Performance (RPS) on 2.7
FWIW, I'm talking about 20-30Mbit of traffic.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@tree
FWIW, I'm talking about 20-30Mbit of traffic.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz]
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 2:16 PM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Performance (RPS) on 2.7
Baird, Josh wrote:
> Hi,
>
&g
-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Performance (RPS) on 2.7
Baird, Josh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for some roundabout requests/second expectations for a
Squid
> 2.7 machine (Modern quad core, 8+GB RAM, RHEL 5.4 x64) with all
caching
> disabled. I will not be
Baird, Josh wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for some roundabout requests/second expectations for a Squid
2.7 machine (Modern quad core, 8+GB RAM, RHEL 5.4 x64) with all caching
disabled. I will not be caching any requests coming into the Squid
server (no cache_dirs, etc). All of the baseline stats that
>> On 16.01.10 14:35, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>> Also, you may want to use CARP from the parents to siblings. That
>>> will restrict the objects each sibling is caching to the URLs CARP
>>> assigns it. Less duplicated objects leading to a longer caching time
>>> window and more hits overall.
>
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 16.01.10 14:35, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Also, you may want to use CARP from the parents to siblings. That will
restrict the objects each sibling is caching to the URLs CARP assigns
it. Less duplicated objects leading to a longer caching time window and
more hit
On 16.01.10 14:35, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Also, you may want to use CARP from the parents to siblings. That will
> restrict the objects each sibling is caching to the URLs CARP assigns
> it. Less duplicated objects leading to a longer caching time window and
> more hits overall.
Is this usab
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 14:12:48 +0100, Markus Meyer
wrote:
> Amos Jeffries schrieb:
>>> Markus Meyer wrote:
>>> mem - Heap GSDF: fast and small objects preferred. Better to have more
>>> small objects in memory than to read them from disk.
>>>
>>> disk - Heap LFUDA: fast and more popular pictures, mo
Amos Jeffries schrieb:
>> Markus Meyer wrote:
>> mem - Heap GSDF: fast and small objects preferred. Better to have more
>> small objects in memory than to read them from disk.
>>
>> disk - Heap LFUDA: fast and more popular pictures, more "hot" content,
>> is preferred.
>
> I'd add a COSS directory
Markus Meyer wrote:
Markus Meyer schrieb:
What is your reason for using heap LRU?
I've heard/read this before that it performs better than LRU. So it's on
my todo-list. But I would like to understand better why heap LRU should
be better.
plain lru is just a list walk and removal. It risks fals
Markus Meyer schrieb:
> What is your reason for using heap LRU?
> I've heard/read this before that it performs better than LRU. So it's on
> my todo-list. But I would like to understand better why heap LRU should
> be better.
One idea I have is to use two different replacement policies for memory
Dusten Splan schrieb:
Hi Dusten,
> One suggestion that I can make is changing your
> memory_replacement_policy and cache_replacement_policy to heap LRU.
What is your reason for using heap LRU?
I've heard/read this before that it performs better than LRU. So it's on
my todo-list. But I would like
One suggestion that I can make is changing your
memory_replacement_policy and cache_replacement_policy to heap LRU.
You should graph your iops on your disk so that you can see if you are
having issues there and need more disk.
Dusten Splan
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 07:18, Markus Meyer wrote:
> Hi
> Hi!
>
> Is there any cache performance comparison between both two stables
> versions ?
>
> I mean, a comparison when both runs in the same hardware doing the same
> thing.
> Just thoughput matters... At this moment I don't care about cpu and I/O
> usage.
>
> Thanks a lot in advance
> Lucas Brasi
2009/1/20 vivian t :
> hi
> how can i know amount of request per sec and what the amount of
> traffic can accept
>
see "squidclient mgr:info" 's output.
for traffic, could use iptraf tool.
Ralf.
limb along with the memory usage.
Grab oprofile and do some digging?
Adrian
>
> Mark.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kinkie [mailto:gkin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 4:50 PM
> To: Mark Kent
> Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
>
To: Mark Kent
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Performance problems with 2.6.STABLE18
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Mark Kent
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently having a performance issue with Squid 2.6.STABLE18
> (running on RHEL4). As I
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Mark Kent wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently having a performance issue with Squid 2.6.STABLE18
> (running on RHEL4). As I run traffic through the proxy, the memory grows
> steadily, and apparently without limit. This increase in memory usage is
> coupled with a st
>For this 15-25MB/s, do you mean bits or bytes? Thanks
bits
>Thanks John. for small files, why don't use GDSF on both locations?
I can't remember exactly - I'll probably compare them both again soon.
J
2008/12/7 Ken DBA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> --- On Sun, 12/7/08, john Moylan <[EMAIL PROTE
Ken DBA wrote:
Has anyone get Squid's best performance datas on a server box with common
hardware (ie,DELL 1950)? These datas include:
1) concurrent connections;
2) flow capacity;
3) TPS (http transaction per second).
Thanks.
What I have so far collected is at:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/K
--- On Sun, 12/7/08, john Moylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: john Moylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> GDSF on disk, LRU on
> Memory.
>
Thanks John. for small files, why don't use GDSF on both locations?
> that's serving
> between
> 15-25Mb/s of outbound traffic.
>
For this 15-25MB/s, d
I should add.. hit ratios are 90 or request but only 20-30% of volume
with my current solution. My requirement is to reduce load on the
backend.
J
2008/12/6 john Moylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a number of squid boxes behind LVS acting as reverse proxies.
>
> They are all HP DL380/385's G4
I have a number of squid boxes behind LVS acting as reverse proxies.
They are all HP DL380/385's G4 Machines (about 3 years old) with 7GB
to 12 GB per machine, 4 unraided 15K SCSI HDD for caches on each
machine.
Mem Caches are 30% of the available ram on each box and each disk has
a 10GB cache.
I
>
> Marcel Grandemange wrote:
>> Good day users.
>>
>>
>> I seem to have a performance issue where my squid server doesn't seem to
>> exceed 400k on objects in cache, it is not the specs of the box as im
>> able
>> to with
>> Different proxy software achieve 8m on a P3.
>>
>> Advise? Need More info
>I'd also check "df -i", maybe you're running out of inodes in your cache dir
Doesn’t seem so
df -i
Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity iused ifree %iused Mounted
on
/dev/ad0s1a 81029320 28328770 4621820638% 613110 98675286% /
devfs 11
Marcel Grandemange wrote:
> Good day users.
>
>
> I seem to have a performance issue where my squid server doesn't seem to
> exceed 400k on objects in cache, it is not the specs of the box as im able
> to with
> Different proxy software achieve 8m on a P3.
>
> Advise? Need More info?
>
>Yes,
I'd also check "df -i", maybe you're running out of inodes in your cache dir
On 11/1/08, Amos Jeffries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcel Grandemange wrote:
>> Good day users.
>>
>>
>> I seem to have a performance issue where my squid server doesn't seem to
>> exceed 400k on objects in cache, it
Marcel Grandemange wrote:
Good day users.
I seem to have a performance issue where my squid server doesn't seem to
exceed 400k on objects in cache, it is not the specs of the box as im able
to with
Different proxy software achieve 8m on a P3.
Advise? Need More info?
Yes,
* version of squid
Lots of stuff performs better than Squid for just straight connection
redirection.
The trick isn't request rate - its how the application behaves under a
variety of conditions. Some people have luck with varnish, pound,
nginx, apache. Some people have no luck with those and luck with
Squid. YMMV.
elsergio 写道:
Hi all,
Does anybody knows how many http queries can Squid dispatch configured as a
balancer (no caching data).
Thanks!
For pure balancer application I suggest you use LVS.
(or maybe Nginx is better than squid on this behavior).
On Thu, May 22, 2008, Markus Moeller wrote:
> Are there any good tools to test proxy performance including authentication
> e.g. NTLM/Negotiate ? I know of Spirents WebAvalanche but don't know if it
> supports authentication.
I believe web polygraph includes NTLM support now.
Adrian
--
-
fre 2008-04-11 klockan 16:41 -0300 skrev jorge escudero:
> Is it neccesary to clean the cache periodicly to improve performance of
> Squid?
No. It's taken care of automatically.
Regards
Henrik
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007, Scott Anctil wrote:
> First my access.log file grows about 200 MB/Hr. This means I reach the
> max file size of 2GB in about 10 hours. I know that I can rotate the
> logs within the 10 hours to solve this but is there a better solution?
./configure --with-large-files
> The
ssue?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Chris Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 8:31 PM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Performance Issues Using NTML
Scott Anctil wrote:
> I have deployed a Squid server for a local school boar
On tis, 2007-11-13 at 10:30 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
> > For NTLM you need lots of helpers due to the chatty nature of the NTLM
> > protocol. And also the number of helpers does not have much impact on
> > load.. All that happens if you have too
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> For NTLM you need lots of helpers due to the chatty nature of the NTLM
> protocol. And also the number of helpers does not have much impact on
> load.. All that happens if you have too many is that Squid uses a little
> bit more memory as there is mo
On lör, 2007-11-10 at 14:34 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > auth_param ntlm children 25
> > auth_param ntlm keep_alive on
>
> 25 helpers. Are they really needed? can much of the load on these be
> done concurrently?
For NTLM you need lots of helpers due to the chatty nature of the NTLM
protoco
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >cache_log /usr/local/squid/var/logs/cache.log
> >cache_store_log /usr/local/squid/var/logs/store.log
>
> I'm not certain why this is even still around. Its only useful for
> debugging the cache store. you an safely set it to "none" and reduce
> load
Scott Anctil wrote:
I have deployed a Squid server for a local school board to help with
there ever increasing bandwidth issues. It is running Squid 2.6 Stable
16 under Ubuntu 7.10 server on a HP DL380. This server has 2GB of RAM, 2
dual core 3.06 GHz processors and 288 GB of SAS 15k storage (RAI
Scott Anctil wrote:
I have deployed a Squid server for a local school board to help with
there ever increasing bandwidth issues. It is running Squid 2.6 Stable
16 under Ubuntu 7.10 server on a HP DL380. This server has 2GB of RAM, 2
dual core 3.06 GHz processors and 288 GB of SAS 15k storage (RAI
On mån, 2007-08-06 at 10:50 +0200, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> I'm running squid (squid-2.6.STABLE6-4.el5) on an old IBM x330
> server (2x 1266MHZ PIII, 1GB RAM, 2 mirrored 36GB disks for OS
> and 20GB squid-spool), serving set-top-boxes' access to the
> internet.
>
> We have a feel for the prox
Assuming you're running with diskd/aufs rather than ufs then I think
your numbers are alright. The default caching rules are quite permissive
and result in less caching than what might be possible, but more
"correct" caching.
You've paid for a support contract via Redhat - I suggest talking to
the
On 11/22/06, Noc Phibee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
anyone can say me what is the best choice in equipment for put a Squid
with Active Directory authentification + squidguard for:
For AD authentication, you'll use LDAP helper, lots of docs on this.
.
for 700 simultaneous user
and
for 50
Noc Phibee schrieb:
Hi
anyone can say me what is the best choice in equipment for put a Squid
with Active Directory authentification + squidguard for:
for 700 simultaneous user
Use 1 mainstream pc . whatever. put one gig of ram and you're done.
and
for 5000 simultaneous user
use 1 h
tor 2006-06-15 klockan 12:03 -0400 skrev lawrence wang:
> I would think that 304 responses are easier to serve, since Squid just
> returns headers -- but i can't find any other difference right now.
> Thanks in advance for your help!
It depends.. serving a 304 requires having the object cached in
>
> Hello Mark,
>
> thanks for your Reply. I have checked the cache.log file and there is a
> suspicious entry in it.
>
> Most of the time, when I try to access web-sites, I get this message:
>
> 2006/03/02 11:07:51| TCP connection to ourisaserver/portnumber failed
> 2006/03/02 11:07:51| TCP conne
> Hello all,
>
> we want to use Squid as a secondary proxy for Maven downloads. It should be
> configured so that certain downloads are cached and can be reused.
>
> Our setup is as followed:
>
> One gateway ISA 2004 Server serves as proxy for all clients and servers Squid
> is installad on a lin
On 08.02 09:13, Kinkie wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 16:29 -0800, Jeremy Utley wrote:
> > /dev/sdb1 -> /cache1
> > /dev/sdc1 -> /cache2
> > /dev/sdd1 -> /cache3
> > /dev/sde1 -> /cache4
> > /dev/sdf1 -> /cache5
> > Each one has it's own cache_dir line in the squid.conf file.
>
> You might want to
Jeremy -
I suspect that your setup should work quite fine. We're running a similar
hardware (6 disk scsi, 4gb RAM) and linux with aufs and ext2/noatime.
There's a couple of things that I would look at, and Kinkie has brought to
light some of them already.
First is, take a look at cachemgr, and
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2006 01:30
To: Squid ML
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Performance problems - need some advice
On 2/7/06, Kinkie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 12:49 -0800, Jeremy Utley wrote:
> > On 2/7/06, Kinkie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 15:36 -0800, Gregori Parker wrote:
> I just deployed 3 squid servers in a similar configuration
> (reverse-proxy serving large media files)...except each server of ours
> is dual 3Ghz Xeon, 64-bit everything, 4GB RAM and around a TB each of
> dedicated cache space (aufs on ext
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 16:29 -0800, Jeremy Utley wrote:
> On 2/7/06, Kinkie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 12:49 -0800, Jeremy Utley wrote:
> > > On 2/7/06, Kinkie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Profiling your server would be the first step.
> > > > How does it spend
> -Original Message-
> From: Gregori Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 2:36 PM
> To: Squid ML
> Subject: RE: [squid-users] Performance problems - need some advice
>
>
> Yes, please keep it on the squid-list...I for one am
>
On 2/7/06, Kinkie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 12:49 -0800, Jeremy Utley wrote:
> > On 2/7/06, Kinkie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Profiling your server would be the first step.
> > > How does it spend its CPU time? Within the kernel? Within the squid
> > > process? In
squid performance? I have no
good way of benchmarking our clusters since SNMP isnt ready quite yet. Please
don't mention cache_mgr, thanks :)
-Original Message-
From: Kinkie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 3:23 PM
To: Jeremy Utley
Cc: Squid ML
Subject: Re: [s
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 12:49 -0800, Jeremy Utley wrote:
> On 2/7/06, Kinkie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Profiling your server would be the first step.
> > How does it spend its CPU time? Within the kernel? Within the squid
> > process? In iowait? What's the number of open filedescriptors in Sq
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 11:26 -0800, Jeremy Utley wrote:
> The problem we're having is that the Squid servers aren't pushing as
> much traffic as we would expect them to. Each of the machines is only
> pushing about 100Mb thru 1Gb interfaces, while the apache servers
> themselves push much more.
>
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:02 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
We have 3 servers, each with about 80-100 connections/s
We use dansguardian
Danguardian increase the latency from 40m to about 70m.
Interesting, thanks! Did you get any complaints about the
slowdown, or was it unnoticed?
--
Peter
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
