On 22.05.06 10:44, Harish Pokharel wrote:
> I am using a Transperent Proxy using port redirection through iptables and
> I am Unable to block ports. Cant I block ports using a transperent proxy?
Actually, you can, but it's probably useless. With transparent proxy, YOU
decide what traffic (hosts, p
Anant,
I've been using Squid/WCCP for transparently proxying about 800 PCs for a
while now - you have to dig about for all the correct bits, but it's very
slick when you finally get it right. My config is:
- Redhat 7.2 with minimum packages
- 2.4.18 kernel with v1.3 source for ip_wccp.c from:
htt
On Friday 18 July 2003 18.51, anant shintre wrote:
> Squid is running O.K.
> Presently I get access log only of those clients where
> I have changed proxy settings. It is not possible to
> go to all machines and change the same. I thing I can
> use transperent proxy for some. Squid FAQ does not
> g
> Presently I get access log only of those clients where
> I have changed proxy settings. It is not possible to
> go to all machines and change the same. I thing I can
> use transperent proxy for some.
Transparent proxying is a hack that breaks the HTTP spec
and can cause all sorts of problems. Yo
lo,
if ur Squid port is 3128
then the correct iptable rule to redirect to squid is
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p TCP --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-port 3128
I am also assuming your doing NAT or are u talking about TPROXY?
Regards,
K
Squid is running O.K.
Presently I get access log only of t
