ex Rousskov [mailto:rouss...@measurement-factory.com]
>>> Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 3:03 PM
>>> To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid3 SMP aufs storage/process
>>>
>>> On 03/08/2013 11:21 PM, jiluspo wrote:
>>>
be submitted for Squid Project review in a few months.
HTH,
Alex.
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alex Rousskov [mailto:rouss...@measurement-factory.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 3:03 PM
>> To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
>> Subject: Re: [sq
able than squid3 stable.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alex Rousskov [mailto:rouss...@measurement-factory.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 3:03 PM
>> To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
>> Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid3 SMP aufs storage/process
>>
>
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 3:03 PM
> To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid3 SMP aufs storage/process
>
> On 03/08/2013 11:21 PM, jiluspo wrote:
>
> > If squid3 configured with cache_dir aufs per process would they
> > share to other
On 03/08/2013 11:21 PM, jiluspo wrote:
> If squid3 configured with cache_dir aufs per process would they
> share to other process?
No. Ufs-based store modules, including aufs, are currently not
SMP-aware. If you use them in SMP Squid (without protecting them with
SMP conditionals), your cache wil
