Dear Friends,
I m going to use squid for cache purpose only.And i heard that for
squid cache performance i have to use good RAM and HDD.I have 4gb RAM
and 160 GB SATA HDD.And i have 200 users' network.So please suggest me
the same.Means can i go with this H/W specification or is there any
Hi List,
A quick Delay Pool question..and a favour..
Currently using basic Delay Pool configuration for users:
delay_class 1 4
delay_parameters 1 -1/-1 -1/-1 -1/-1 200/200
delay_access 1 allow !SERVERSUBNETS AuthenticatedUsers
delay_access 1 deny all
Users authenticate via Kerberos,
On 17/12/10 20:11, Manuel wrote:
Hello,
How common is for the client app to work with SMTPS proxies? I have a
vBulletin forum in a backend that I want it to send e-mails to the users
through a SMTP server in a different server. vBulletin app works fin with
SMTP servers through TLS and SSL but
On 17/12/10 23:23, Nick Cairncross wrote:
Hi List,
A quick Delay Pool question..and a favour..
Currently using basic Delay Pool configuration for users:
delay_class 1 4
delay_parameters 1 -1/-1 -1/-1 -1/-1 200/200
Careful with those big numbers. They are in *bytes* and only the
Hi Amos,
The pause happens when ICAP sends about 90% of the payload. The Content-Length
header shown the exact size as 106900. I believe by the time squid starts to
send the RESPMOD payload, all the DNS should already finished.
If you look at the tcpdump on port 443, it pauses for 2 minutes
Il 17/12/2010 11:09, benjamin fernandis ha scritto:
Dear Friends,
I m going to use squid for cache purpose only.And i heard that for
squid cache performance i have to use good RAM and HDD.I have 4gb RAM
and 160 GB SATA HDD.And i have 200 users' network.So please suggest me
the same.Means can i
I would also highly recommend using at least a Dual Core CPU, 1.6GHz +
for 200 users. CPU performance is also a very important factor for user
volume.
-
Chad E. Naugle
Tech Support II, x. 7981
Travel Impressions, Ltd.
Marcello Romani
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On 17/12/10 10:38, Jason Greene wrote:
I m trying to close a security hole
I want to use maxconn on ALL IPs
acl limitusercon maxconn 3
http_access deny all limitusercon
Testing the all there is not useful. That
True, but I recommend it, especially for the OS processing the disk I/O,
and authenticators, etc, but it's not really a requirement.
-
Chad E. Naugle
Tech Support II, x. 7981
Travel Impressions, Ltd.
Bradley, Stephen W. Mr. bradl...@muohio.edu
It doesn't make sense... I set the limit to 50 and I run my scan and
the vulnerability shows... I drop it back by 5 and run my scan... it
show until I get to 20...the vulnerability goes away I increase
the limit by 1 until I get to 25 where it shows back up... I drop back
down to 24 ... still
On 18/12/10 04:35, Jason Greene wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Amos Jeffriessqu...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On 17/12/10 10:38, Jason Greene wrote:
I m trying to close a security hole
I want to use maxconn on ALL IPs
acl limitusercon maxconn 3
http_access deny all limitusercon
I am not sure if I understood what is not capable of Squid. You mean that use
Squid to hide the client IP sender is not possible? This is the goal, the
first message at serverfault is mine:
http://serverfault.com/questions/212333/how-to-hide-the-client-ip-sender-and-show-only-the-smtp-server-ip
12 matches
Mail list logo
