Re: [squid-users] Integrated Windows Authentication through Squid

2012-01-16 Thread Javier Conti
On 14 January 2012 07:44, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote: On 14/01/2012 4:41 a.m., Javier Conti wrote: Hi list, I'm trying to setup access to several internal websites that use Integrated Windows Authentication in a Windows XP/7/2008 environment through Squid 3.1.12. I

Re: [squid-users] Integrated Windows Authentication through Squid

2012-01-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 16/01/2012 9:34 p.m., Javier Conti wrote: On 14 January 2012 07:44, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 14/01/2012 4:41 a.m., Javier Conti wrote: Hi list, I'm trying to setup access to several internal websites that use Integrated Windows Authentication in a Windows XP/7/2008 environment through Squid

Re: [squid-users] Silly warning about over disk limits

2012-01-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 11/01/2012 11:44 p.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: I had this too. But with a 3.1.18 in a production server (under solaris). Sure that was 3.1.18? that could narrow the diagnosis down a lot if its true. Amos 2012/01/10 10:11:54| WARNING: Disk space over limit: 1644356946 KB

Re: [squid-users] Silly warning about over disk limits

2012-01-16 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Amos Jeffries wrote: On 11/01/2012 11:44 p.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: I had this too. But with a 3.1.18 in a production server (under solaris). Sure that was 3.1.18? that could narrow the diagnosis down a lot if its true. Yes. It's on a 3.1.18 on a Solaris box. Tell me if I

Re: [squid-users] Silly warning about over disk limits

2012-01-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 17/01/2012 2:43 a.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: Amos Jeffries wrote: On 11/01/2012 11:44 p.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: I had this too. But with a 3.1.18 in a production server (under solaris). Sure that was 3.1.18? that could narrow the diagnosis down a lot if its

Re: [squid-users] Silly warning about over disk limits

2012-01-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 17/01/2012 3:00 a.m., Amos Jeffries wrote: On 17/01/2012 2:43 a.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: Amos Jeffries wrote: On 11/01/2012 11:44 p.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: I had this too. But with a 3.1.18 in a production server (under solaris). Sure that was 3.1.18? that

Re: [squid-users] Silly warning about over disk limits

2012-01-16 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
I'm doing it... First removing 10394. I'll post the results after test. Amos Jeffries wrote: On 17/01/2012 3:00 a.m., Amos Jeffries wrote: On 17/01/2012 2:43 a.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: Amos Jeffries wrote: On 11/01/2012 11:44 p.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: I had

Re: [squid-users] Silly warning about over disk limits

2012-01-16 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Amos Jeffries wrote: 3.1 narrows it down to probably just these two patches: www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.1/changesets/squid-3.1-10394.patch www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.1/changesets/squid-3.1-10403.patch The top one being more likely. If you are able to patch and test with those

Re: [squid-users] Forcing Header in Reverse Proxy

2012-01-16 Thread Roman Gelfand
I made several mistakes in my original post. So, I am rewriting it here... I have setup configuration to forward requests to a backend server... acl mail urlpath_regex ^/mesg https_port 443 cert=/etc/certs/mail.pem key=/etc/certs/mail.key vhost vport cache_peer mail.mydomain.com parent 80 0

Re: [squid-users] Silly warning about over disk limits

2012-01-16 Thread FredB
I removed just the patch 10394. After a half hour, no more messages and the proxy works without problem. Just as reference, before, I usually got something like I'm not sure that this appeared just after start up or not. I should probably let it run for some longer time (one or two

Re: [squid-users] Silly warning about over disk limits

2012-01-16 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
FredB wrote: Perhaps you can try a killall squid ? Because I saw that there is no problem with clean cache Look at Comment 10 - http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3441 OK, I've done... It found a dirty cache and rebuild it. But well. Let's let it run for some time. Either way,

[squid-users] Squid and ftp

2012-01-16 Thread Olivier CALVANO
Hi We have a big problems. We have two proxy : One in 3.0.STABLE7 and the second in 3.1.4 My users want access to a ftp: ftp://test:t...@ftp.url.com/download/document.doc on the first proxy, in 3.0.STABLE7, that's work without problems. on the second, that's don't work, we have a error

Re: [squid-users] Forcing Header in Reverse Proxy

2012-01-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 17.01.2012 04:15, Roman Gelfand wrote: I made several mistakes in my original post. So, I am rewriting it here... I have setup configuration to forward requests to a backend server... acl mail urlpath_regex ^/mesg https_port 443 cert=/etc/certs/mail.pem key=/etc/certs/mail.key vhost

Re: [squid-users] Forcing Header in Reverse Proxy

2012-01-16 Thread Roman Gelfand
fair enough. How would you, then, implement the following... I would like to forward https://xyz.mydomain.com/server1 to http://server1.mydomain.com and https://xyz.mydomain.com/server2 to http://server2.mydomain.com. Please, keep in mind, the target server is apache and it has servername tag

Re: [squid-users] Forcing Header in Reverse Proxy

2012-01-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 17.01.2012 11:21, Roman Gelfand wrote: fair enough. How would you, then, implement the following... I would like to forward https://xyz.mydomain.com/server1 to http://server1.mydomain.com and https://xyz.mydomain.com/server2 to http://server2.mydomain.com. Please, keep in mind, the target

Re: [squid-users] Squid and ftp

2012-01-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 17.01.2012 08:18, Olivier CALVANO wrote: Hi We have a big problems. We have two proxy : One in 3.0.STABLE7 and the second in 3.1.4 Both of these are very old. You might have better success with the current 3.1 release. My users want access to a ftp: