On 14 January 2012 07:44, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
On 14/01/2012 4:41 a.m., Javier Conti wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to setup access to several internal websites that use
Integrated Windows Authentication in a Windows XP/7/2008
environment through Squid 3.1.12. I
On 16/01/2012 9:34 p.m., Javier Conti wrote:
On 14 January 2012 07:44, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 14/01/2012 4:41 a.m., Javier Conti wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to setup access to several internal websites that use
Integrated Windows Authentication in a Windows XP/7/2008
environment through Squid
On 11/01/2012 11:44 p.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
I had this too. But with a 3.1.18 in a production server (under solaris).
Sure that was 3.1.18? that could narrow the diagnosis down a lot if its
true.
Amos
2012/01/10 10:11:54| WARNING: Disk space over limit: 1644356946 KB
Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 11/01/2012 11:44 p.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
I had this too. But with a 3.1.18 in a production server (under solaris).
Sure that was 3.1.18? that could narrow the diagnosis down a lot if its
true.
Yes. It's on a 3.1.18 on a Solaris box.
Tell me if I
On 17/01/2012 2:43 a.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 11/01/2012 11:44 p.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
I had this too. But with a 3.1.18 in a production server (under
solaris).
Sure that was 3.1.18? that could narrow the diagnosis down a lot if its
On 17/01/2012 3:00 a.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 17/01/2012 2:43 a.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 11/01/2012 11:44 p.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
I had this too. But with a 3.1.18 in a production server (under
solaris).
Sure that was 3.1.18? that
I'm doing it... First removing 10394. I'll post the results after test.
Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 17/01/2012 3:00 a.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 17/01/2012 2:43 a.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 11/01/2012 11:44 p.m., Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
I had
Amos Jeffries wrote:
3.1 narrows it down to probably just these two patches:
www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.1/changesets/squid-3.1-10394.patch
www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.1/changesets/squid-3.1-10403.patch
The top one being more likely. If you are able to patch and test with
those
I made several mistakes in my original post. So, I am rewriting it here...
I have setup configuration to forward requests to a backend server...
acl mail urlpath_regex ^/mesg
https_port 443 cert=/etc/certs/mail.pem key=/etc/certs/mail.key vhost vport
cache_peer mail.mydomain.com parent 80 0
I removed just the patch 10394. After a half hour, no more messages
and the proxy works without
problem. Just as reference, before, I usually got something like
I'm not sure that this appeared just after start up or not. I should
probably let it run for some
longer time (one or two
FredB wrote:
Perhaps you can try a killall squid ? Because I saw that there is no problem
with clean cache
Look at Comment 10 - http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3441
OK, I've done... It found a dirty cache and rebuild it.
But well. Let's let it run for some time. Either way,
Hi
We have a big problems. We have two proxy :
One in 3.0.STABLE7
and the second in 3.1.4
My users want access to a ftp:
ftp://test:t...@ftp.url.com/download/document.doc
on the first proxy, in 3.0.STABLE7, that's work without problems.
on the second, that's don't work, we have a error
On 17.01.2012 04:15, Roman Gelfand wrote:
I made several mistakes in my original post. So, I am rewriting it
here...
I have setup configuration to forward requests to a backend
server...
acl mail urlpath_regex ^/mesg
https_port 443 cert=/etc/certs/mail.pem key=/etc/certs/mail.key vhost
fair enough.
How would you, then, implement the following...
I would like to forward https://xyz.mydomain.com/server1 to
http://server1.mydomain.com and https://xyz.mydomain.com/server2 to
http://server2.mydomain.com. Please, keep in mind, the target server
is apache and it has servername tag
On 17.01.2012 11:21, Roman Gelfand wrote:
fair enough.
How would you, then, implement the following...
I would like to forward https://xyz.mydomain.com/server1 to
http://server1.mydomain.com and https://xyz.mydomain.com/server2 to
http://server2.mydomain.com. Please, keep in mind, the target
On 17.01.2012 08:18, Olivier CALVANO wrote:
Hi
We have a big problems. We have two proxy :
One in 3.0.STABLE7
and the second in 3.1.4
Both of these are very old. You might have better success with the
current 3.1 release.
My users want access to a ftp:
16 matches
Mail list logo