Re: [squid-users] WARNING: no_suid: setuid(0): (1) Operation not permitted

2013-02-01 Thread Silamael
On 02/01/2013 01:09 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: Hmm. Yes the warning is new since we started adding debugs() about failed system calls to display reviously hidden system errors. Looking at all the documentation about setuid() and seteuid() I'm wondering if this was supposed to be seteuid(0) -

Re: [squid-users] Re: Squid 3.2 kerberos authentication

2013-02-01 Thread Ludovit Koren
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:16:46 - hua...@moeller.plus.com(Markus Moeller) said: Hi Ludovit, As background information the Negotiate protocol is a protocol which can handle Kerberos and NTLM tokens and the client decides based on its configuration (and actice Directory) if Kerberos

Re: [squid-users] SQUID Debugging

2013-02-01 Thread Roman Gelfand
k.. I figured this out already. I was under the impression there was no command https_port. After changing the http_port to https_port, I am getting results. Thanks On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Roman Gelfand rgelfa...@gmail.com wrote: Is the request or response arrives on port 80?

[squid-users] Problem with squid and rp-pppoe serverver

2013-02-01 Thread Georgi Maleshkov
Hi, i have some problem with implementing squid3 like transparent proxy and rp-pppoe server, for extended home network. In iptables inside the PREROUTING section i see that the rule for the extended users of my home network works have some packages and transfer, but they can't access any web

Re: [squid-users] Problem with squid and rp-pppoe serverver

2013-02-01 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
Hey Georgi, It seems like an OS level problem rather then any squid business. You can try to contact the OS\DISTRO mailing list or forums to get some more help about that. Eliezer On 2/1/2013 4:18 PM, Georgi Maleshkov wrote: Hi, i have some problem with implementing squid3 like transparent

Re: [squid-users] Caching HLS content?

2013-02-01 Thread Scott Baker
On 01/31/2013 04:30 PM, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote: an even better approach would be correctly setup your webserver to send the appropriate expire times for the .m3u8 files so your caches neither any other one would cache them :) a correctly expire time for the .ts could be sent as

Re: [squid-users] Re: Splitting objects by size into different cache_dir not working for me

2013-02-01 Thread Luciano Ruete
Hi, I've tested with maximum_object_size_in_memory 64 KB And now I have both cache_dir AUFS and rock caching objects and growing at the same time, so thanks for that. But I don't understand the logic behind this, because from the docs about maximum_object_size_in_memory you read: This

Re: [squid-users] Re: Splitting objects by size into different cache_dir not working for me

2013-02-01 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
On 2/1/2013 2:33 AM, babajaga wrote: Hi, I am just starting to test with rock. And it could be, I have just the opposit effect: Only UFS is used, rock not, using default of 512Kb righ now. However, will do more testing tomorrow, but I am a bit suspicious regarding this line in your squid.conf:

Re: [squid-users] Re: Splitting objects by size into different cache_dir not working for me

2013-02-01 Thread Luciano Ruete
On 02/01/2013 03:05 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: On 2/1/2013 2:33 AM, babajaga wrote: Hi, I am just starting to test with rock. And it could be, I have just the opposit effect: Only UFS is used, rock not, using default of 512Kb righ now. However, will do more testing tomorrow, but I am a bit

Re: [squid-users] Re: Splitting objects by size into different cache_dir not working for me

2013-02-01 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
On 2/1/2013 8:04 PM, Luciano Ruete wrote: I've already tested and the above seams to be true. How can I know for shure if there are or not objects in the cache_dir greater than maximum_object_size_in_memory? I can ran more tests if you give me further instructions, or can try a patch if

[squid-users] transparent vs. not-transparent oddity

2013-02-01 Thread Roman Gelfand
In non-transparent mode, ie 9 worked much faster chrome. In trasparent mode, just the opposite. Why? Thanks

Re: [squid-users] Re: Splitting objects by size into different cache_dir not working for me

2013-02-01 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 02/01/2013 09:42 AM, Luciano Ruete wrote: I've tested with maximum_object_size_in_memory 64 KB And now I have both cache_dir AUFS and rock caching objects and growing at the same time, so thanks for that. But I don't understand the logic behind this, because from the docs about

Re: [squid-users] Re: Splitting objects by size into different cache_dir not working for me

2013-02-01 Thread Luciano Ruete
On 02/01/2013 03:52 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: On 2/1/2013 8:04 PM, Luciano Ruete wrote: I've already tested and the above seams to be true. How can I know for shure if there are or not objects in the cache_dir greater than maximum_object_size_in_memory? I can ran more tests if you give me

Re: [squid-users] Re: Splitting objects by size into different cache_dir not working for me

2013-02-01 Thread Luciano Ruete
On 02/01/2013 04:04 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote: On 02/01/2013 09:42 AM, Luciano Ruete wrote: I've tested with maximum_object_size_in_memory 64 KB And now I have both cache_dir AUFS and rock caching objects and growing at the same time, so thanks for that. But I don't understand the logic behind

Re: [squid-users] Re: Splitting objects by size into different cache_dir not working for me

2013-02-01 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
On 2/1/2013 10:06 PM, Luciano Ruete wrote: You can set these settings in squid.conf store_dir_select_algorithm round-robin #^^default is: least-load which can cause your problem. cache_dir rock /var/spool/squid/rock 1000 min-size=1024 max-size=31000 max-swap-rate=250 swap-timeout=350 cache_dir

Re: [squid-users] Re: Splitting objects by size into different cache_dir not working for me

2013-02-01 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 02/01/2013 12:04 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote: On 02/01/2013 09:42 AM, Luciano Ruete wrote: I've tested with maximum_object_size_in_memory 64 KB And now I have both cache_dir AUFS and rock caching objects and growing at the same time, so thanks for that. But I don't understand the logic

Re: [squid-users] transparent vs. not-transparent oddity

2013-02-01 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 2/02/2013 8:04 a.m., Roman Gelfand wrote: In non-transparent mode, ie 9 worked much faster chrome. In trasparent mode, just the opposite. Why? Chrome uses protocols which are not HTTP to fetch traffic, and do not work through HTTP proxies. IE uses HTTP that can be optimized a bit by