Hello,
I have two machines with each two squid processes. I want that every process
is querying the other three over htcp if it has a specified element in its
cache.
So this is my setting:
| Proxyserver1: IP 192.168.1.1
On Monday 14 July 2014 at 12:21:19, Klaus Reithmaier wrote:
Hello,
I have two machines with each two squid processes. I want that every
process is querying the other three over htcp if it has a specified
element in its cache.
So this is my setting:
On 14/07/2014 10:32 p.m., Antony Stone wrote:
On Monday 14 July 2014 at 12:21:19, Klaus Reithmaier wrote:
Hello,
I have two machines with each two squid processes. I want that every
process is querying the other three over htcp if it has a specified
element in its cache.
So this is my
-Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz schrieb: -
An: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Von: Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz
Datum: 14.07.2014 12:39
Betreff: Re: [squid-users] Define two cache_peer directives with same IP but
different ports
On 14/07/2014 10:32 p.m., Antony Stone wrote:
-20140714 KB-Delta
Cnt-20140712Cnt-20140714Cnt-Delta
Total 5629096 7494319 1865223 26439770
337042107264440
mem_node2375038 3192370 817332 588017 790374 202357
4K Buffer 1138460 146 361536 284615
Hello
I have a problem with
- squid-3.3.9
- squid-3.4.5
but NO
problem with:
- squid-2.7.stable9
- without proxy
I have tested with
firefox 24.6 and ie explorer 8.0.
On browser the error displayed is:
The following error was encountered while trying to retrieve the URL:
Hey There,
We do not have a clue about your setup(you didn't shared any relevant
information).
What OS are you using?
Is it a self compiled version of squid?
Is this a reverse or forward proxy?
You can use this script:
http://www1.ngtech.co.il/squid/basic_data.sh
To share relevant
It's very easy to miss..
I think it can be notified to the user with a simple one liner but I do
not know 100% it's right.
Eliezer
On 07/14/2014 02:08 PM, Klaus Reithmaier wrote:
Thanks Amos, exactly what i searched for. Sorry overlooking this in the
documentation...
Klaus
-3.5.0.003-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
http://www1.ngtech.co.il/rpm/centos/6/x86_64/head/squid-helpers-3.5.0.003-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
It's based on the sources of:
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.HEAD/squid-3.HEAD-20140714-r13496.tar.gz
I do hope to release 3.4.6 in the next week but since I have been
walking
You are Wrong..
If you authenticate using a regular HTTP page and use a login page it
will work for mobile but they Won't gain access throw the proxy until
they will login in the splash or another page.
It's being used on many WIFI networks and it's very simple to implement.
Good Luck,
Hi,
I have a multi-ports config of squid running from version 3.1.19
upgraded to 3.3.12. Working like a charm, but the traffic is reaching
one cpu limit.
I want to use SMP capabilities with SMP workers on my 8 cpus/64G mem
Fedora 20 box.
I saw in the
Hey There,
It depends, In a case you are using UFS\AUFS cache_dir you cannot.. use
SMP with it.
You will need to use rock and only rock as a cache_dir for the time being.
You need to run squid -kparse to make sure your settings makes sense
for squid.
else then that you should look at
Hey Eliezer,
Happy to read you.
What do you call rock as cache_dir?
Here is squid -kparse
2014/07/14 18:13:25| Startup: Initializing Authentication Schemes ...
2014/07/14 18:13:25| Startup: Initialized Authentication Scheme 'basic'
2014/07/14 18:13:25| Startup: Initialized Authentication
Hi all,
After an upgrade of squid3 to version 3.3.8-1ubuntu6, I got the
unpleasant surprise of what is called the Host header forgery
policy.
I've read the documentation of this part, and although I understand
the motivation of its implementation, I honestly see not very
practical implementing
Hey There,
I do not know your setup but if you run:
dig domain.com
and the results are different from what the client tries to request it
seems to be a Host Header Forgery like..
In the case of google, it seems like google instead of pointing to one
of your servers points to a local server but
Hi Eliezer,
I understand that, but this is pretty much the point of my e-mail. In
my company we don't work with servers installed physically here,
instead, we rent servers to a company. We use 2 nameservers for our
clients, and the IT company uses others and additionally they don't
allow to
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 19:23 +0100, Edwin Marqe wrote:
Hi Eliezer,
I understand that, but this is pretty much the point of my e-mail. In
my company we don't work with servers installed physically here,
instead, we rent servers to a company. We use 2 nameservers for our
clients, and the IT
On 07/14/2014 09:23 PM, Edwin Marqe wrote:
Hi Eliezer,
I understand that, but this is pretty much the point of my e-mail. In
my company we don't work with servers installed physically here,
instead, we rent servers to a company. We use 2 nameservers for our
clients, and the IT company uses
On 07/14/2014 08:42 PM, Patrick Chemla wrote:
Hey Eliezer,
Happy to read you.
What do you call rock as cache_dir?
Squid uses cache_dir to store objects on disk.
If you don't know what it is I will refer you to the configuration pages:
http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/cache_dir/
Your
Besides SMP, there is still the old fashioned option of multiple instances
of squid, in a sandwich config.
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/MultipleInstances
Besides described port rotation, you can set up 3 squids, for example:
one frontend, just doing ACLs and request dispatching (carp), and 2
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 15:57 +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
Hi there
I've started testing sslbump with ssl_bump server-first and have
noticed something (squid-3.4.5)
If your clients have the Proxy CA cert installed and go to legitimate
https websites, then everything works perfectly (excluding
Several ssl inspecting firewalls also provide this capability.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 14, 2014, at 6:10 PM, Brendan Kearney bpk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 15:57 +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
Hi there
I've started testing sslbump with ssl_bump server-first and have
noticed
22 matches
Mail list logo
