Dear sir/madam,
I'm using squid proxy server, and want to use 2 parent proxy.
First parent cor certain destination (based on ip address), and the second for
other destination.
I have tried to use cache_peer_access as follows, but it failed.
My squid only want to use the parent which I wrote it
Hi all,
I am quite new to this list, however having sifted through many pages of FAQ's
and config docs I am still confused as to if it is possible to acheive my goal.
I am working with squid.2.4.stable1, and am trying to authenticate NT domain
users/groups particularly groups against
Then you should upgrade. You are seeing these problems because you are
using an old version of Squid.
It is possible to work around the issue by clearing your cache, but
you really should upgrade.
Regards
Henrik
On Friday 13 June 2003 18.28, Ampugnani, Fernando wrote:
Squid 2.4 stable1, I
hi all,
i was browsing through one of my cache.log files and noticed a message
saying that the request header size had been exceeded. Given that it was
set to the default of 10K and the conf file says that its usually 512 bytes
ish I wondered
1). Anyone else seeing these messages
2). Having
On Saturday 14 June 2003 03.23, Adam wrote:
This worked on the Squid proxy prior to our implementing
delay_pools. However now that we have enabled delay pools, it
breaks. Making the delay pool bucket larger or the bandwidth given
larger isn't our ideal option so I was hoping some of you have
On Saturday 14 June 2003 08.36, Adi Nugroho wrote:
Dear sir/madam,
I'm using squid proxy server, and want to use 2 parent proxy.
First parent cor certain destination (based on ip address), and the
second for other destination.
Using dst type acls in cache_peer_access is not entirely
On Saturday 14 June 2003 19.27, Mark Fagan wrote:
Lets say its OK to authenticate by user only, can I create an acl
that applies to say, user1, user2, user3 and so on, using only
smb_auth and without upgrading or recompiling my current
version.(assuming I install the M$ patch first)
If this
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 15:19:47 +0200, Henrik wrote:
Hmm.. delay pools should not make a difference here..
Are you sure you have not changed any of the timeouts? Especially the
read_timeout option.
Hello Henrik,
We had the read_timeout at 5minutes for a while but set it back to
15minutes (which
On Sunday 15 June 2003 00.21, Steven Sporen wrote:
I'm trying to understand how the digest authentication was
implemented within Squid, specifically how does Squid calculate the
hash to compare to what the client sent through if the nonce value
is changed per session?
Squid asks the helper
On Sunday 15 June 2003 00.15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We had the read_timeout at 5minutes for a while but set it back to
15minutes (which is 10 minutes longer than the job takes to
finish). Also from what I understood of read_timeout from the conf
file, if that had been the issue, then a
10 matches
Mail list logo
