Hello All,
I have run into some problems with a the two websites not able to load when
squid is configured with wccp2. I have followed the example by Adrian Chadd,
and the wiki:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/FreeBsdAndWccp2?highlight=%28%5EConfigExamples/%5B%5E/%5D%2A%24%29
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008, J. Peng wrote:
I found that 32-bit squid can run max memory of 1.8G.
does a 64-bit squid support much larger memory than the limit above?
where to get a 64-bit squid source? thanks!
Just compile it with a 64 bit compiler.
Adrian
--
- Xenion -
Chris thank you for the info.
In your previous mail you mention two things:
1. http_access allow all - This is a temp configuration. Once I will
have all I need up and running I will start to limit the access.
2. maximum_object_size Cache-peer size - I have notice this when I
downloaded a 1GB
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:54:52 +0800
J. Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found that 32-bit squid can run max memory of 1.8G.
does a 64-bit squid support much larger memory than the limit above?
where to get a 64-bit squid source? thanks!
You need to use a 64 bit OS (look for x86_64 instead of
Reverse proxy configuration in squid-2.5 :
http_port 80 # Port of Squid proxy
httpd_accel_host 172.16.1.115 # IP address of web server
httpd_accel_port 80 # Port of web server
httpd_accel_single_host on # Forward uncached requests to single host
httpd_accel_with_proxy on
Anyone here using ESI ?
I have a simple esi page (header already sent out),
e.g.
==
start
esi:include src=http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210.html;
onerror=continue /
end
==
log said:
GET http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210.html HTTP/1.0 403 -
Thanks alex but this is the real question.
It seems that DansGuardian can use ICAP protocol to connect himself to
others ICAP servers (like antivirus) in the same Squid way ...
But i didn't seen any option (or not documented) that enable
DansGuardian has an ICAP server.
In second way a friend
Hello
I have a problem with this site : http://www.sytadin.fr
when using the squid , if I access directly I have no problem.
My squid config is really a basic one
Anyone has the same problem ?
see below the error message:
From: Amos Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pokeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:12:13 +1300 (NZDT)
Subject: Re: [squid-users] bittorrent behind squid
MAN
you need to set up some firewall rules to run torrents i thinks torrents
not
fully support http connections
they use
On 2/14/08, Amos Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here in my simple server, the squid works fine, but after post a
message about radio, Amos sad:
Squid is actually an
interceptor, not fully transparent. When they go down clients can expect
'Unable to Connect' errors.
And, this
Hi Folks,
I have installed squid 3.0 stable 1 and have configured it for
transparent mode.
Somehow it doesn't seem to work correctly.
When it runs, it shows that it is running in transparent mode, but then
when HTTP requests hit the box it gives the WARNING: Transparent
proxying not supported.
Quite simply, how often does the wswin_check_lm_group process check
group membership? Is it every time a rule referencing a group is
triggered, or does it keep a cache and update it every X minutes? If the
later is this configurable?
Also, is there a way to add timestamps against errors it logs
DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar wrote:
Reverse proxy configuration in squid-2.5 :
http_port 80 # Port of Squid proxy
httpd_accel_host 172.16.1.115 # IP address of web server
httpd_accel_port 80 # Port of web server
httpd_accel_single_host on # Forward uncached requests to single host
Quoting Frank Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello
I have a problem with this site : http://www.sytadin.fr
when using the squid , if I access directly I have no problem.
My squid config is really a basic one
Anyone has the same problem ?
see below the error message:
Hi Folks,
I have installed squid 3.0 stable 1 and have configured it for
transparent mode.
Somehow it doesn't seem to work correctly.
When it runs, it shows that it is running in transparent mode, but then
when HTTP requests hit the box it gives the WARNING: Transparent
proxying not supported.
I'd suggest by starting with tcpdump and see whats going on.
It works for me, and I'm behind a Squid.
adrian
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
I have a problem with this site : http://www.sytadin.fr
when using the squid , if I access directly I have no problem.
My squid
Am 2008-02-13 10:25:32, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
by using the same URI? or by different URI each time a song is requested?
each of this makes problems with HTTP caching...
Yes, it is always the same url...
For example: The original file is sampled in 192kBit and then a user
use:
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 10:46 +0100, TOUZEAU DAVID wrote:
It seems that DansGuardian can use ICAP protocol to connect himself to
others ICAP servers (like antivirus) in the same Squid way ...
But i didn't seen any option (or not documented) that enable
DansGuardian has an ICAP server.
If you
I required the following to allow Hotmail and Gmail:
acl Hotmail dstdomain .hotmail.com .hotmail.msn.com .login.live.com
.mail.live.com .passport.com calendar.msn.com g.live.com
acl Gmail dstdomain .gmail.com mail.google.com ssl.google-analytics.com
acl GmailUrlRegExp url_regex -i
Hi,
At 12:31 14/02/2008, Paul Cocker wrote:
Quite simply, how often does the wswin_check_lm_group process check
group membership? Is it every time a rule referencing a group is
triggered, or does it keep a cache and update it every X minutes? If the
later is this configurable?
There is no
Anyone here using ESI ?
I have a simple esi page (header already sent out),
e.g.
==
start
esi:include src=http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210.html;
onerror=continue /
end
==
log said:
GET http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210.html
Tomer Brand wrote:
Chris thank you for the info.
Even though it was inaccurate... That's what I get for not checking the
RFC before handing out suggestions... *sigh* Caveat lector.
Public - To enable caching of the data
Must-revalidate - To force SQUID recheck with the back-end
On 2/14/08, Amos Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here in my simple server, the squid works fine, but after post a
message about radio, Amos sad:
Squid is actually an
interceptor, not fully transparent. When they go down clients can
expect
'Unable to Connect' errors.
And, this
Hi Folks,
I have installed squid 3.0 stable 1 and have configured it for
transparent mode.
Somehow it doesn't seem to work correctly.
When it runs, it shows that it is running in transparent mode, but then
when HTTP requests hit the box it gives the WARNING: Transparent
proxying not
I use 32bit squid and its currently using 3.8GB of ram. 32bit squid
has a 4G limit
mike
At 06:54 PM 2/13/2008, J. Peng wrote:
I found that 32-bit squid can run max memory of 1.8G.
does a 64-bit squid support much larger memory than the limit above?
where to get a 64-bit squid source? thanks!
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
aren't above directives depracated in 2.6?
They are. I believe squid commercial support companies though still
support 2.5 as required. The visolve poster is one such commercial
supporter.
I do too; for some reason I've also got a Squid-2.4
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
aren't above directives depracated in 2.6?
They are. I believe squid commercial support companies though still
support 2.5 as required. The visolve poster is one such commercial
supporter.
I do too; for some reason I've also got a Squid-2.4
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Amos Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*Where* in squid.conf is rather important. If it's at the end then it may
be useless.
Amos
Hello,
Below is my squid.conf (comments removed), anyone can take a fast look...?
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008, leongmzlist wrote:
I use 32bit squid and its currently using 3.8GB of ram. 32bit squid
has a 4G limit
32 bit squid has a 2 gig limit. I suggest you check whether its actually
32 bit, and if it is, I'd love to know which platform its on and how it
works. :)
Adrian
--
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
I do too; for some reason I've also got a Squid-2.4 customer..
I hope you at least know why they are still down there...
Because its heavily customised. :)
In fact, I actually have a Squid-2.2 (yes, two point two) customer who
is paying to have
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Amos Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
*Where* in squid.conf is rather important. If it's at the end then it
may
be useless.
Amos
Hello,
Below is my squid.conf (comments removed), anyone can take a fast look...?
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Amos Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Amos Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
*Where* in squid.conf is rather important. If it's at the end then it
may
be useless.
Amos
Hello,
Below is my
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2008-02-13 10:25:32, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
by using the same URI? or by different URI each time a song is requested?
each of this makes problems with HTTP caching...
Yes, it is always the same url...
For example: The original
33 matches
Mail list logo
