[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I use Squid as a proxy of Streaming protocol such as WMV,RealMedia and
QuickTime?
Can I use Squid as a proxy of Instant Messsage such as AOL,Yahoo and MSN?
Squid is an HTTP proxy, so anything that can use HTTP proxies can go
through it.
MSN Messenger and ICQ can f
Hello, I have a question.
Can I use Squid as a proxy of Streaming protocol such as WMV,RealMedia and
QuickTime?
Can I use Squid as a proxy of Instant Messsage such as AOL,Yahoo and MSN?
I'm very sorry that my English is so poor.
> This has all been on a test machine that has access to OWA and the
> internal network, nothing production was touched :) I work with a very
> large network so I have a lot of resources to at my disposal.
>
Doh, here I was still thinking along the lines of you doing auth in squid.
Now I've got me
I not sure what you mean by a newer copy of the same URL? Can you elaborate on
that a bit?
As far as I know, the aspx pages displays a list of buttons for each video
file. When the user clicks on the button, it references the URL.
I've seen it where the user click the link and gets a TCP_REFR
On mån, 2008-10-20 at 16:02 -0700, BUI18 wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I have been trying to track down an issue with Squid 2.6 STABLE18 and
> why users were getting TCP_REFRESH_MISS instead of TCP_REFRESH_HIT on
> files that were recently cached. We first noticed that users were
> getting misses when we exp
Hi -
Here's some additional info I noticed from the store.log.
1224524455.351
SWAPOUT 00 0003A6CB 7377CBD1A7584A5D7C7FD06B5B827595 200 1224524431
1224522501-1 video/jpeg 1337100/1337100 GET
http://ftp.mydomain.com/myserver/websites/data/MyVideoFile1020130441180.vid
1224544851.517
RELEAS
Hi -
I have been trying to track down an issue with Squid 2.6 STABLE18 and why users
were getting TCP_REFRESH_MISS instead of TCP_REFRESH_HIT on files that were
recently cached. We first noticed that users were getting misses when we
expected them to receive hits.
I have set the min and max a
On mån, 2008-10-20 at 19:57 +0300, Monah Baki wrote:
> Can I have my squid cache be a secondary cache to a bluecoat server?
Yes.
Regards
Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi All,
Can I have my squid cache be a secondary cache to a bluecoat server?
Thanks
This has all been on a test machine that has access to OWA and the
internal network, nothing production was touched :) I work with a very
large network so I have a lot of resources to at my disposal.
The config (it's been sanitized for confidentiality reasons):
https_port 10.212.134.117:443 vho
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:17:12 +0200
Henrik Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On mån, 2008-10-20 at 11:01 +0200, Malte Schröder wrote:
> Have you inspected the ICAP responses from imageFilter, and paired this
> with the error? I suspect the error may be from there.
No I had not done that. But
2008/10/20 Amos Jeffries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> It's not so much an empty string. As a completely missing header.
> Squid can only test what it has against what it checks. If you get my
> meaning.
>
> I haven't tested it, but you might have better luck if you invert the test
> to allow access to
James Cohen wrote:
Hi,
I think I've found a bug but first wanted to double-check I wasn't
doing anything dumb.
In our reverse proxy setup we want to block people from "leeching" the
images using Wget or similar applications. To do this we want to block
user agents that match "Wget" and because
Aviral Pandey wrote:
Thanks Henrik...But I have seen vice-versa to be working i.e., server
sending a gzipped response and squid serving deflated one when client
asks for deflated content
Are you sure? squid does _transfer_ chunked decoding. But thats special
compression only 'zipped' betw
After some further testing and looking closely at the request headers
it turns out that this is failing because the User-Agent header field
isn't present (rather than it being present but empty).
Here's my workaround/solution which seems to work nicely.
acl image_leechers browser ^$
acl image_lee
On mån, 2008-10-20 at 11:21 +0100, Simon Waters wrote:
> Apache will do this as a reverse proxy, but Apache as a reverse proxy is
> interesting - most places I've seen it done it is sitting on the webserver on
> port 80 forwarding to less capable webservers on another port. Although
> Apache ca
What webserver is it that doesn't support compression?
Its a custom webserver, a very simple one which does file serving and
has no application built upon it. I am using squid as a reverse proxy here.
On mån, 2008-10-20 at 05:42 -0500, Jian Wang wrote:
> I'm not sure how to do this. Is it externally changing the
> configuration of the router? For example,
> in the Squid external_acl_helper code, telnet to the router and add an
> acl line to the configuration of router?
Yes that's one way.
> Is
On mån, 2008-10-20 at 16:08 +0530, Aviral Pandey wrote:
> Thanks Henrik...But I have seen vice-versa to be working i.e., server
> sending a gzipped response and squid serving deflated one when client
> asks for deflated content
This is not available in any Squid version.
But Squid do suppor
Hi,
I think I've found a bug but first wanted to double-check I wasn't
doing anything dumb.
In our reverse proxy setup we want to block people from "leeching" the
images using Wget or similar applications. To do this we want to block
user agents that match "Wget" and because lots of people use CU
Thanks Henrik...But I have seen vice-versa to be working i.e., server
sending a gzipped response and squid serving deflated one when client
asks for deflated content
My squid is 2.6-16.
Thanks,
Avi
http://aviral.piworx.com
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On mån, 2008-10-20 at 15:23 +0530, Avira
On mån, 2008-10-20 at 06:20 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> All the videos are cachable. Because the video's are maintained by us.
>
> But the origin server not near by us. So i try to cache and serve to
> customers quickly.
So fix the origin. Alternatively you can play games with a url rewri
On Monday 20 October 2008 10:53:14 Aviral Pandey wrote:
> My server doesn't support gzip and hence serves content in
> unzipped/raw/deflate format.
> When my client asks for Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, squid is sending
> it raw content. Shouldn't it gzip and then send?
No, it could (in theory)
On mån, 2008-10-20 at 15:23 +0530, Aviral Pandey wrote:
> When my client asks for Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, squid is sending
> it raw content. Shouldn't it gzip and then send?
No, Content-Encoding (just as Content-Languate) is a task of webservers,
not semantically transparent proxies such
On mån, 2008-10-20 at 11:01 +0200, Malte Schröder wrote:
> Hello,
> I am seeing entries like below quite frequently. It looks to me as if the
> Content-Language and Content-Location headers are not parsed correctly, since
> I
> cannot see this stuff in the traffic going to the squid. In this con
Thanks Henrik,
All the videos are cachable. Because the video's are maintained by us.
But the origin server not near by us. So i try to cache and serve to
customers quickly.
And also the objects are cached by squid. But performance is very slow.
so i need some tips to improve the performa
On mån, 2008-10-20 at 19:13 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> You need to fix the VOD implementation to use cacheable URI. Or scream
> at the vendors who wrote it so they fix it.
And most won't fix it as they regard this cache unfriendlyness as one of
the premium features of their system.
Regards
He
My server doesn't support gzip and hence serves content in
unzipped/raw/deflate format.
When my client asks for Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, squid is sending
it raw content. Shouldn't it gzip and then send? Is there a way in which
this can be achieved?
Thanks,
Avi
Hello,
I am seeing entries like below quite frequently. It looks to me as if the
Content-Language and Content-Location headers are not parsed correctly, since I
cannot see this stuff in the traffic going to the squid. In this config Squid
has a WebWasher installation as parent and has an imagefi
Vernon Kennedy-Van Dam wrote:
Thanx very much Amos. Much appreciated with the feedback.
Hi All
I am looking to route download traffic based on file size of the download
requests. If a user in our network was to download a 10mb file, he gets
routed through link 1. If a user requests a 100mb
30 matches
Mail list logo