Hi,
I have quite a few of these lines:
2008/12/04 12:10:02| httpReadReply: Request not yet fully sent POST
http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/xxxmoodle/files/index.php;
Where xxx has been removed.
I also have the following lines, but I dont think it's associated with that
error:
Warning: All url_rewriter
What about awstats?
It's in the debian-repositories and you can change the LogFormat to fit squid's
Format.
Gives nice graphs here ;)
Greets Philip
Michael Fernández M schrieb:
I have try:
Sarg
Calamaris
Squid-graph
Internet Access Control
But all of them not give the king of graphs that
Chris Lee wrote:
Dear Amos,
I added children=7 at the end of the following line at file squid.conf :
external_acl_type win_domain_group ttl=120 %LOGIN
c:/squid/libexec/mswin_check_lm_group.exe -G children=7
Even I restart the SQUID 2.7.STABLE4 windows version, the cache.log still
show it only
Alex Choo wrote:
Hi!
i was trying to setting up a Interception Caching or Transparent
Caching with squid. i'm puzzled that we needs to redirect the traffic
to Squid listening port from port 80.
i've tried to configured Squid to listen on port 80 and the relevant
config for transparent
Amos,
One thing I missed out in this was to tell I already had,
http_access allow our_network work_hours
I understand that,
http_access deny our_network !work_hours
will also work, but then why mine is not working?
~~~
Thanks Regards,
Sameer Shinde.
Sr. Customer Support
Sameer Shinde wrote:
Amos,
One thing I missed out in this was to tell I already had,
http_access allow our_network work_hours
I understand that,
http_access deny our_network !work_hours
will also work, but then why mine is not working?
Well, the difference is that they ware not exact
acl src_ip_me src 1.1.1.1/32
log_access deny src_ip_me
--- On Thu, 12/11/08, Chris Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Chris Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [squid-users] How to exclude some ip addresses from squid access
log.
To: squid-users squid-users@squid-cache.org
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 08:59 +0100, Philip Asprion wrote:
What about awstats?
It's in the debian-repositories and you can change the LogFormat to fit
squid's Format.
Gives nice graphs here ;)
That's right.. i din`t try it yet
Thanks!
Michael.-
Greets Philip
Michael
Hello,
I want to configure different maximum_object_size depend on destination
domain.
Is it possible ?
Thank and excuse-me about my english
Pascal
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/different-maximum_object_size-depend-on-destination-domain-tp20956844p20956844.html
Sent
Thanks for your reply, Adrian. I'm very appreciated for your help.
I'd suggest using your OS profiling to figure out where the CPU is
being spent. This may be a symptom, not the cause.
Here is the top output snapshot:
last pid: 76181; load averages: 1.15, 1.12, 1.08up 6+05:35:14
Hi All,
am obviously a newbie here so am seeking an advice if i may..
my current topology is as such:
cisco 2811 router---Lan (contains users/squid)
Squid is installed on ubuntu.
and has one NIC with static ip 192.168.0.14/24
i've managed to get direct proxy working with minimal
I can help you out with this as needed.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: RoLaNd RoLaNd [mailto:r_o_l_a_...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thu 12/11/2008 1:05 PM
To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: [squid-users] Cisco with WCCP!! newbie here..
Hi All,
am obviously a newbie here so am seeking
Hi,
I have a few time based ACLs which are used in delay_pools. In the
literature, it suggests that the higher limit in time based ACL should
always be higher than the lower limit, which works well, but what about if
we want to define something like: 6pm to 2am? Will 18:00-02:00 work?
nitroz wrote:
Hello,
I want to configure different maximum_object_size depend on destination
domain.
Is it possible ?
Thank and excuse-me about my english
Pascal
Not in any current squid.
The major problem is that object size is often not known until the
object is finished arriving. Same
Nyamul Hassan wrote:
Hi,
I have a few time based ACLs which are used in delay_pools. In the
literature, it suggests that the higher limit in time based ACL should
always be higher than the lower limit, which works well, but what about
if we want to define something like: 6pm to 2am? Will
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Nyamul Hassan wrote:
Hi,
I have a few time based ACLs which are used in delay_pools. In the
literature, it suggests that the higher limit in time based ACL
should always be higher than the lower limit, which works well, but
what about if we want to define something
Chris Robertson wrote:
Amos Jeffries wrote:
Nyamul Hassan wrote:
Hi,
I have a few time based ACLs which are used in delay_pools. In the
literature, it suggests that the higher limit in time based ACL
should always be higher than the lower limit, which works well, but
what about if we want
Dear Amos,
It worked! Thanks a lot. ^_^
Regards,
Chris Lee
-Original Message-
From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 17:45 PM
To: Chris Lee
Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] win_domain_group processes are busy
Which version of Squid are you using again? I patched the latest
Squid-2.HEAD with some aufs related fixes that reduce the amount of
callback checking which is done.
Uhm, check src/fs/aufs/store_asyncufs.h :
/* Which operations to run async */
#define ASYNC_OPEN 1
#define ASYNC_CLOSE 0
#define
Thank you very much for your reply!
Which version of Squid are you using again?
I'm using the latest stable release:
# /usr/local/squid/sbin/squid -v
Squid Cache: Version 2.7.STABLE5
configure options: '--prefix=/usr/local/squid' '--with-pthreads'
'--with-aio' '--with-dl' '--with-large-files'
20 matches
Mail list logo
