Harley Jackson Willmott wrote:
2009/7/28 Amos Jeffries :
Harley Jackson Willmott wrote:
2009/7/27 Amos Jeffries :
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:50:24 +1000, Harley Jackson Willmott
wrote:
Hey all.
I've done lots of searching and haven't been able to find examples of
this particular scenario so I'm
2009/7/28 Amos Jeffries :
> Harley Jackson Willmott wrote:
>>
>> 2009/7/27 Amos Jeffries :
>>>
>>> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:50:24 +1000, Harley Jackson Willmott
>>> wrote:
Hey all.
I've done lots of searching and haven't been able to find examples of
this particular scenario
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:10:39 +0100, "Markus Moeller"
wrote:
> Any idea what I need to do to avoid this error ?
>
> ld: fatal: symbol `void*operator new(unsigned)' is multiply-defined:
> (file debug.o type=FUNC; file SquidNew.o type=FUNC);
> ld: fatal: symbol `void operator delete(void*)'
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:54:29 -0700, George Herbert
wrote:
> Cool. Is there going to be a STABLE17A or something, or do we have to
> hand-patch for now?
The next formally bundled will be STABLE18. However the daily snapshots
serve as intermediate updates on STABLE
(http://www.squid-cache.org/Vers
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:42:06 +0800, "SSCR Internet Admin"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible for squid to see what is the actual workstation ip address
> which is requesting from inside a firewall?
>
> LAN FIREWALL --- SQUID
>
> Thank you.
>
When the firewall is passing packets without al
So here's an odd one.
I can connect to the cachemgr menu just fine. When I do so, I see an entry in
Apache's access.log stating that I accessed the cgi. I also see an entry in
Squid's cache log stating that the cgi accessed the menu.
All of my other cgi scripts are working fine, so I don't th
Hi,
Is it possible for squid to see what is the actual workstation ip address
which is requesting from inside a firewall?
LAN FIREWALL --- SQUID
Thank you.
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4286 (20090728) __
The message was
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:10:54 -0500, Andres Salazar
wrote:
> I have isloated the issue due to this .htaccess file:
>
> AddHandler application/x-httpd-php .html .htm
> AddType application/x-httpd-php .html .htm
> Options +FollowSymLinks
> RewriteEngine on
>
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^protected-do
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:14:37 -0700 (PDT), xetorthio
wrote:
> Amos Jeffries-2 wrote:
>>
>> Thats not good.
>> What version of Squid is this and what does your configuration file
>> contain?
>> (without the config comments and empty lines please)
>>
>
> Hi Amos,
> The version of the squid that I'
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:44:53 -0400, "ADEBAYO, FOLUSO, ATTSI"
wrote:
> Hi Amos,
>Thanks for the response. Can you point me in the direction of an
> external ACL helper that can help me do this?
Look to the source helpers/external_acl/* or package for the helpers
available in your Squid.
The se
Any idea what I need to do to avoid this error ?
ld: fatal: symbol `void*operator new(unsigned)' is multiply-defined:
(file debug.o type=FUNC; file SquidNew.o type=FUNC);
ld: fatal: symbol `void operator delete(void*)' is multiply-defined:
(file debug.o type=FUNC; file SquidNew.o ty
Thanks Kinkie, and Chris - much appreciated!
I am definitely going to upgrade Squid.
Regarding changing to transparent mode, I'm glad to learn that I can do it with
a single Ethernet port, however, I am rethinking doing this, based on your
input. I certainly don't want to complicate things for
Eric Van Steenbergen wrote:
Hello,
I've setup successfully a Squid Reverse Proxy using the [B]How To Set
Up A Caching Reverse Proxy With Squid 2.6[/B] although with some
differences. I installed Squid 3 stable 16 on a Debian 5.0 Lenny
server. I also installed it with SSL support, created my own
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Kevin C.
Connell wrote:
> Greetings,
Hello!
> We are running v 2.6.STABLE18 on an Ubuntu box that has (1) Ethernet port. We
> are successfully running Squid in non-transparent mode, and it works very
> well.
>
> My first question:
>
> Is there a compelling reaso
Kevin C. Connell wrote:
Greetings,
We are running v 2.6.STABLE18 on an Ubuntu box that has (1) Ethernet port. We
are successfully running Squid in non-transparent mode, and it works very well.
My first question:
Is there a compelling reason to upgrade to a newer version of Squid?
I don't
Cool. Is there going to be a STABLE17A or something, or do we have to
hand-patch for now?
Thanks!
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> martin.pichlma...@continental-corporation.com wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Amos,
>>
>> your patch did the trick, it now works smoothly.
>> I didn't
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Chris Robertson wrote:
> Angela Williams wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>> On Tuesday 28 July 2009, qwertyjjj wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> How much RAM would be required to run Squid Proxy for a number of users?
>>> I realise there is no exact answer but a rough guide?
>>> For example, I h
Greetings,
We are running v 2.6.STABLE18 on an Ubuntu box that has (1) Ethernet port. We
are successfully running Squid in non-transparent mode, and it works very well.
My first question:
Is there a compelling reason to upgrade to a newer version of Squid?
My second question:
Can I run our c
>Sorry for the silly question, I've been using squid to allow access to users
>on a domain, but how can I limit access to users only in a certain security
>group on the domain.
Check the wiki out. Once they are in a group, you specify group access in the
ntlm_auth helper something like this:
auth
Angela Williams wrote:
Hi!
On Tuesday 28 July 2009, qwertyjjj wrote:
How much RAM would be required to run Squid Proxy for a number of users?
I realise there is no exact answer but a rough guide?
For example, I have a linux proxy server with 100Mbit mainly retransmitting
and caching running v
Gontzal wrote:
2009/7/28 Nick Duda :
Sorry for the silly question, I've been using squid to allow access to users on
a domain, but how can I limit access to users only in a certain security group
on the domain.
- Nick
I understand it is working fine authenticating against AD so:
Onc
I have isloated the issue due to this .htaccess file:
AddHandler application/x-httpd-php .html .htm
AddType application/x-httpd-php .html .htm
Options +FollowSymLinks
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^protected-domain.com
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.protected-domain.com/$1 [R=301,L]
R
I understand it is working fine authenticating against AD so:
Once you have created your AD groups, you have to set some acls
depending on the AD group, for example:
acl GR_OFICIAL external winbind_group G_2_NAV_Oficial
acl GR_NORMAL external winbind_group G_3_NAV_Estandar
acl GR_AVANZADO externa
Hello,
I have revised my config and included the lines as the wiki Reverse
Proxy suggested, however Iam now recieving a "Endless Loop" error from
the browser and will not display the site.
Below is the config Iam using without the squid comments.
http_port 80 accel defaultsite=protected_domain.c
Hi!
On Tuesday 28 July 2009, qwertyjjj wrote:
> How much RAM would be required to run Squid Proxy for a number of users?
> I realise there is no exact answer but a rough guide?
> For example, I have a linux proxy server with 100Mbit mainly retransmitting
> and caching running video (I assume about
How much RAM would be required to run Squid Proxy for a number of users?
I realise there is no exact answer but a rough guide?
For example, I have a linux proxy server with 100Mbit mainly retransmitting
and caching running video (I assume about 512kbps).
I'm guessing this could support up to 100 u
Hi Amos,
Thanks for the response. Can you point me in the direction of an
external ACL helper that can help me do this?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 9:11 PM
To: ADEBAYO, FOLUSO, ATTSI
Cc: squid-users@squid-cach
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote:
>
> Thats not good.
> What version of Squid is this and what does your configuration file
> contain?
> (without the config comments and empty lines please)
>
Hi Amos,
The version of the squid that I'm using is: squid-2.7.STABLE6
My configuration file is the following:
h
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote:
>
> Thats not good.
> What version of Squid is this and what does your configuration file
> contain?
> (without the config comments and empty lines please)
>
Hi Amos,
The version of the squid that I'm using is: squid-2.7.STABLE6
My configuration file is the following:
h
jotacekm wrote:
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:14:29 -0700 (PDT), jotacekm
wrote:
Hello.
Recently we have added a lot more clientes behind a squid proxy, and now
cpu
utilizitaion is usually 70-95%. The processor is a intel dual core 2160
@
1.80GHz. Users started complaing a
Sorry for the silly question, I've been using squid to allow access to users on
a domain, but how can I limit access to users only in a certain security group
on the domain.
- Nick
Daniel wrote:
Good morning,
This is probably nothing to worry about, but I am noticing the
following errors in my Squid 3.1.0.12 cache.log file. Is this just some
things overlooked from 3.1.0.12?
Thanks
-Daniel
=
Cache.log snippet: |
=
2009/07
Thanks man!!!
Wilson Hernandez - MSD, S. A. wrote:
>
> echo "%%% Transparent Proxy %%%"
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $LAN_IFACE -p tcp \
> -s $LAN_ADDRESSES --sport $UNPRIVPORTS --dport 80 \
> -j REDIRECT --to-port 3128
>
> iptables -A INPUT -i $LAN_IFACE -p tcp \
>
Good morning,
This is probably nothing to worry about, but I am noticing the
following errors in my Squid 3.1.0.12 cache.log file. Is this just some
things overlooked from 3.1.0.12?
Thanks
-Daniel
=
Cache.log snippet: |
=
2009/07/27 15:31:18| er
Amos Jeffries-2 wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:14:29 -0700 (PDT), jotacekm
> wrote:
>> Hello.
>> Recently we have added a lot more clientes behind a squid proxy, and now
>> cpu
>> utilizitaion is usually 70-95%. The processor is a intel dual core 2160
> @
>> 1.80GHz. Users started complain
Chris Boczko wrote:
Hello List,
Im struggling with HTTP/1.1 based websites through my squid proxy (2.5 on debian, built
from source, config below) is there any way I can simply forward 1.1 based http requests
without squid "touching" them, and changing them to http/1.0. As the sites i am
tryi
Hello List,
Im struggling with HTTP/1.1 based websites through my squid proxy (2.5 on
debian, built from source, config below) is there any way I can simply forward
1.1 based http requests without squid "touching" them, and changing them to
http/1.0. As the sites i am trying to access will not
martin.pichlma...@continental-corporation.com wrote:
Thank you Amos,
your patch did the trick, it now works smoothly.
I didn't have time to test yesterday, therefore sorry for my late
response.
Martin
Amos Jeffries
27.07.2009 17:00
An
martin.pichlma...@continental-corporation.com
Kopi
Dylan Palmboom wrote:
Hi
I have searched all over for an answer to this but could not find
anything...
Please could someone explain to me what the best practice is when it comes
to
blocking ip addresses in a dhcp environment. If I block an ip address with
eg.
acl BlockedHost src 192.168.1.15
h
Hello Amos,
Thanks for support . Now it is working fine
Saturday, July 25, 2009, 6:12:40 AM, you wrote:
> Farhad Ibragimov wrote:
>> Hello Squid-users,
>>
>>Dear Squid Guru
>>
>>I am install new squid 3 days ago . The version is 3.0 15 . The
>>problem is that i don't se
40 matches
Mail list logo
