Re: [squid-users] Changes related to /etc/resolv.conf and squid

Hallo, Amos, Du meintest am 25.01.12: >> If I changed the entry in /etc/resolv.conf then, Is there need to >> reload/reconfigure the squid? > Yes. Squid does not monitor the configuration files for changes. It's > on the feature wishlist, but nobody has had enough interest to code > up a small b

Re: [squid-users] Changes related to /etc/resolv.conf and squid

Thanks a lot  Amos!!!

Re: [squid-users] Problem in squid 3.1.4

Hello Amos, Thanks. [squid.conf] auth_param ntlm program /usr/bin/ntlm_auth SUCOM_NET/MUSSURUNGA --helper-protocol=3Dsquid-2.5-ntlmssp auth_param ntlm children 20 # Quantidade de processos ntlm abertos #auth_param ntlm max_challenge_reuses 0 #auth_param ntlm use_ntlm_negotiate off #auth_param n

Re: [squid-users] Problem in squid 3.1.4

On 25.01.2012 13:24, João Paulo Ferreira wrote: Hello Sorry my English is not the same as good. I have installed in my company with Squid 3.1.4 (Winbind, Samba, Kerberos), but I have noticed the following message in the file caches.log * got NTLMSSP command 3, expected 1* This is a message

[squid-users] Problem in squid 3.1.4

Hello Sorry my English is not the same as good. I have installed in my company with Squid 3.1.4 (Winbind, Samba, Kerberos), but I have noticed the following message in the file caches.log * got NTLMSSP command 3, expected 1* I searched the community and informed them that the problem is the type

Re: [squid-users] Changes related to /etc/resolv.conf and squid

On 25.01.2012 01:47, Nil Nik wrote: precondition: Squid is up and running... If I changed the entry in /etc/resolv.conf then, Is there need to reload/reconfigure the squid? Yes. Squid does not monitor the configuration files for changes. It's on the feature wishlist, but nobody has had enough

RE: [squid-users] UNSUBSCRIBE!!!!

On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Oliver Marshall wrote: Nope. Shouldn't really have to hunt in the headers. There should be clear unsubscribe information present within the email body itself. Presenting it in the headers in a standardized format (which information in the message body would not be) allows

Re: [squid-users] squid continued even though it couldn't log?

On 25.01.2012 01:19, E.S. Rosenberg wrote: Hi all, I'm a bit puzzled by some logs at the moment: Last night we had a situation that caused one of our proxies to fill up it's logging disk, squid went down (as expected), but in syslog it looks like the squid parent is stil going and trying to crea

RE: [squid-users] UNSUBSCRIBE!!!!

On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 09:50 -0500, Alona Rossen wrote: > How can I unsubscribe from this mailing list? http://lmgtfy.com/?q=squid+users+unsubscribe Third in the list.

Re: [squid-users] UNSUBSCRIBE!!!!

On 25.01.2012 08:46, Giles Coochey wrote: On 24/01/2012 19:20, Oliver Marshall wrote: Nope. Shouldn't really have to hunt in the headers. There should be clear unsubscribe information present within the email body itself. Enough, it's an FAQ http://www.comfsm.fm/computing/squid/FAQ-1.html#ss

Re: [squid-users] UNSUBSCRIBE!!!!

On 24/01/2012 19:20, Oliver Marshall wrote: Nope. Shouldn't really have to hunt in the headers. There should be clear unsubscribe information present within the email body itself. Enough, it's an FAQ http://www.comfsm.fm/computing/squid/FAQ-1.html#ss1.10 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryp

Re: [squid-users] UNSUBSCRIBE!!!!

* Oliver Marshall : > Same issue here. > > I'm just marking it as spam as there's no clear unsubscribe link anywhere. How did you mange to subscribe in the first place? (But I do agree that a footer should be added) List-Post: List-Help:

RE: [squid-users] UNSUBSCRIBE!!!!

Nope. Shouldn't really have to hunt in the headers. There should be clear unsubscribe information present within the email body itself. -Original Message- From: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org] Sent: 24 January 2012 18:28 To: Oliver Marshall Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org Subjec

RE: [squid-users] UNSUBSCRIBE!!!!

On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Oliver Marshall wrote: Same issue here. I'm just marking it as spam as there's no clear unsubscribe link anywhere. Have you even _looked_ at the message headers? List-Unsubscribe: -Original Message- From: Alon

Re: [squid-users] UNSUBSCRIBE!!!!

Control-U (Thunderbird) shows: List-Unsubscribe: Hope that helps ! On 25/01/2012 05:47, Oliver Marshall wrote: Same issue here. I'm just marking it as spam as there's no clear unsubscribe link anywhere. -Original Message- From: Alona R

RE: [squid-users] UNSUBSCRIBE!!!!

Hi, I suggest you look in the headers of every message you have received from the list. The list (un)subscribe and help mail addresses are there. On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Oliver Marshall wrote: Same issue here. I'm just marking it as spam as there's no clear unsubscribe link anywhere. -Ori

RE: [squid-users] UNSUBSCRIBE!!!!

Same issue here. I'm just marking it as spam as there's no clear unsubscribe link anywhere. -Original Message- From: Alona Rossen [mailto:aros...@opentext.com] Sent: 24 January 2012 14:50 To: Amos Jeffries; Carlos Manuel Trepeu Pupo Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: RE: [squid-user

Re: [squid-users] Performanceproblem Squid with one URL - strange behaviour ...

Hi Amos, On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 04:43:12PM +0100, Andreas Schulz wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:53:18PM +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > Hi, > > > So doing I/O to a disk log somehow speeds up TCP throughput? strange > definitely right ... but I'm not sure if this speeds up TCP throughput - > b

Re: [squid-users] how about releasing the major "supported" linux distros results? and what about dynamic content sites?

On 23/01/2012 21:56, Henrik Nordström wrote: ons 2012-01-04 klockan 12:48 +0200 skrev Eliezer Croitoru: the funny thing is that fedora 16 with kernel 3.1.6 and squid 3.2.0.13 from the repo just works fine. And have nothing special for making Squid run at all.. except not mucking around with

[squid-users] Re: NTLM auth for RPC over HTTPS to outlook everywhere

Please, help ... I'll have to find another solution if squid doesn't work with NTLM auth for rpc over https to outlook anywhere... -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/NTLM-auth-for-RPC-over-HTTPS-to-outlook-everywhere-tp4315913p4323954.html Sent f

RE: [squid-users] UNSUBSCRIBE!!!!

How can I unsubscribe from this mailing list? I submitted "Unsubscribe" request awhile ago, but it was ignored. -Original Message- From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squ...@treenet.co.nz] Sent: January 23, 2012 5:56 PM To: Carlos Manuel Trepeu Pupo Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: Re: [

[squid-users] Changes related to /etc/resolv.conf and squid

precondition: Squid is up and running... If I changed the entry in /etc/resolv.conf then, Is there need to reload/reconfigure the squid?

[squid-users] squid continued even though it couldn't log?

Hi all, I'm a bit puzzled by some logs at the moment: Last night we had a situation that caused one of our proxies to fill up it's logging disk, squid went down (as expected), but in syslog it looks like the squid parent is stil going and trying to create new children to handle requests: Jan 24 05

Re: [squid-users] request_header_replace and acl

> > request_header_access is a fast ACL so it can't do DNS lookups to > find > the dst IP address itself. > It also only has access to details in the HTTP request headers and > src > IP address. > > Using dstdomain ACL on the requested domain name it should work. > > NP: using the server connec

Re: [squid-users] request_header_replace and acl

On 24/01/2012 11:08 p.m., FredB wrote: Hi, I'm searching the good method for using request_header_replace with acl (dst) acl test dst 10.1.1.0/24 request_header_access Via allow test request_header_access Via deny all request_header_replace Via 1.1 toto Sadly my header always contain toto re

[squid-users] request_header_replace and acl

Hi, I'm searching the good method for using request_header_replace with acl (dst) acl test dst 10.1.1.0/24 request_header_access Via allow test request_header_access Via deny all request_header_replace Via 1.1 toto Sadly my header always contain toto